PDA

View Full Version : Which Pokémon should have new evoluions in Generation V?


bolmedias14
June 12th, 2008, 06:11 AM
Pretty obvious what this thread is about. Evolutions includes both pre-evolutions and proper evolutions.

Myself, I kinda fancy the idea of a baby stage of Buizel, who is currently one of my favs. I can actually visualise what a baby Buizel would look like- the main thing would be the flotation sac, which instead of being around the neck, would either be around its body like an inner tube, or be a lot smaller (and inflatable at will) and hang from its neck like a collar. Also, it would only have one set of markings under its eyes, and everything else about it would be a lot smaller.

Aside from Buizel, I think an evolution of Seviper would go down well, and maybe one of Zangoose to match it.

Madara Uchiha
June 12th, 2008, 06:18 AM
First off a new pikachu evoltuion that allows him to evolve without a thunderstone.
2.a new lapras evolution
3pachirus evolution
4 and some more I cant think of wright noe.

bolmedias14
June 12th, 2008, 06:20 AM
Those are some good ideas there.
I think maybe an evolution of Rapidash would work.

The_G'
June 12th, 2008, 06:27 AM
Here some :

A linoone evo
a tropius evo and pre evo
and more that I will think about later.
And I disagree about a lapras evo Cause it looks good the way that it is and it has high stats already (According to some people) so it means having it evolve mean ubering it.

bolmedias14
June 12th, 2008, 06:30 AM
Tropius is a very good idea, definitely.

Zore
June 12th, 2008, 08:41 AM
FARFETCH'D- He has needed two evos since day one
Mightyena, Sableye, Luvdisc, Unown, Chatot, Rotom, Linoone, Raticate, Fearow, Spinda, Shuckle, Plustle, and Minun all need an evolution badly.

EviladeBlazingDemon
June 12th, 2008, 09:02 AM
I think it's about time the baby Kangaskhan had its own pokemon. And maybe Kangaskhan could evolve.
Other than that, Lapras, Pinsir and Haunter should have an alternate evolved form other Gengar.

bolmedias14
June 12th, 2008, 09:20 AM
Pretty much every Pokémon without an evolutionary line.

Tauros; Girafarig; Unown (maybe); Dunsparce; Qwilfish; Shuckle; Heracross; Corsola; Delibird; Skarmory; Stantler; Smeargle; Miltank; Sableye...

Basically every Pokémon listed here (http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Category:Pok%C3%A9mon_that_are_not_part_of_an_evolutionary_line) apart from legendaries.

jaggy101
June 12th, 2008, 09:41 AM
A new pre-evolution of octillary other then remoraid cos that diesnt realy work

Gooberdued
June 12th, 2008, 10:48 AM
I think there should be a pre-evo of Lapras, not an evolution.

Farfetch'd doesn't really need one, he's kind of a gimmick Pokemon anyway. Pincer definitely needs an evo, so does Cherrim and Chatot.

EDIT: 100th post FTW!

Mitchman
June 12th, 2008, 11:47 AM
Evos:
pinser
chatot
luvdisc
pachirisu
carnivine

pre evos:
chatot
buizel
tropius
lapras
minun/plusle
tauros/miltank
lunatone/sunrok

~*!*~Tatsujin Gosuto~*!*~
June 12th, 2008, 04:08 PM
Pre-evo of Kangaskhan. It will finally explain the pkmn in her pouch. Either make that Pkmn evolve into a male version of Kasgaskhan or if its a male it won't evolve(like combee) and the females evolve into Kangi


:t354:TG

bolmedias14
June 13th, 2008, 01:40 AM
Well, most of my ideas have already been said, although I still think an evo of Seviper (which no-one but me has said so far) is needed. Other than that...Chatot; Pinser; all those which have already been said.

5tat3
June 13th, 2008, 04:54 AM
evo: houndoom corsola, quagsire, sandslash, clefable

bolmedias14
June 13th, 2008, 06:11 AM
evo: houndoom corsola, quagsire, sandslash, clefable
Yeah, but the problem with Clefable is that it's evo line already has 3 stages.

vano-m
June 13th, 2008, 06:18 AM
Arcanine, Mewthree)))

AND MORE MORE MORE EVEE EVOLUTIONS

bolmedias14
June 13th, 2008, 06:45 AM
no more eevolutions...please no more.

hothead
June 15th, 2008, 11:52 PM
I think thank if any pokemon needs one it would be seviper which would be like a enormous version of it bigger tail and then if you give seviper an evolve you need to give zangoos and evovle so i think that shoulf just become bigger and longer claws

and i know they can not do it but i think they should of made a middle evolution of snover to abosnoman because the change was to drastic they need a middle evolution

Jubilation
June 16th, 2008, 12:27 AM
I say more Bug pokemon, some that are good for competitive battling, maybe a evolution of Parasect & Fortresse =]

Halcyon
June 16th, 2008, 01:14 AM
Qwilfish and Dunsprace desperately... T_T
Oh, maybe Luvdisc too!

Ah, yes! Banette too! Dusclops have, why not Banette. Sheesh.
Same applies to Pinsir...

The_G'
June 16th, 2008, 02:33 AM
I think bug pokemon should be given more evos than 3 Cause they evolve in very low levels. More eeveelutions

Neosplash
June 17th, 2008, 12:45 AM
Pre-evo of Kangaskhan. It will finally explain the pkmn in her pouch. Either make that Pkmn evolve into a male version of Kasgaskhan or if its a male it won't evolve(like combee) and the females evolve into Kangi


:t354:TG

I think it's about time the baby Kangaskhan had its own pokemon. And maybe Kangaskhan could evolve.
Other than that, Lapras, Pinsir and Haunter should have an alternate evolved form other Gengar.

Maybe they can do what the did with Shedinja. When Kangaskhan evolves ( into Queengaskhan ._.; ) you also get a baby Kangaskhan ( kangakoo =3 ). The baby would then evolve into a male Kangaskhan then a Kingaskhan.

I can't think of any good names right now, it's late and I'm tired. ;___;

1stGenNut
June 17th, 2008, 12:59 AM
Why should EVERY pokemon evolve?
I fail to see why Houndoom would need to evolve - it looks damn fine as it is.
I'm not too fussed, I'd rather not see any other evolutions from current Pokemon we have had recently.

It seems pointless too to add MORE evolutions to bug Pokemon that evolve early. They do enough evolving, and it seems silly really.

hothead
June 17th, 2008, 03:11 AM
Why should EVERY pokemon evolve?
I fail to see why Houndoom would need to evolve - it looks damn fine as it is.
I'm not too fussed, I'd rather not see any other evolutions from current Pokemon we have had recently.

It seems pointless too to add MORE evolutions to bug Pokemon that evolve early. They do enough evolving, and it seems silly really.

I do agree with in some points like some pokemon do not need evolutions like hoondoom for example dose not need an evolution but i think pokemon like QUILFISH need and evolution i love that pokemon but it is just not strong enough to saty in my team to long if that pokemon and seviper and zangusse get evolves i will be happy but what would make me even more happy is that if the got rid on LICKY LICKY that pokemon S U C K S

Atlas
June 17th, 2008, 06:58 AM
Tauros and Miltank, most definetaly.

Miltank and other second gen pokemon need more love... They were the ones that started this "evolution on pre-existing pokemon" stuff.

1stGenNut
June 18th, 2008, 12:32 AM
But what could you evolve Miltank and Tauros into? o.o
We should all do our own artists impressions xD

ellishall123
June 18th, 2008, 08:04 AM
I think Plusle and Minum should have their own evolutions thatd be well cool.Also seviper and Zangoose should have a pre evolution and evolution

manga_meijin2
December 5th, 2008, 12:42 PM
I think evolving some bug Pokémon would be a great idea, maybe if instead of evolving your Caterpie so early on, if you had the patience to raise it to a level like 25 without evolving it, you could evolve it into something that is formidable.

Aegis
December 5th, 2008, 01:01 PM
This thread hasn't been posted in in almost 6 months >_< That's way over the one month limit for reviving a thread.

-Closed-