PDA

View Full Version : WWIII (world war 3) is it going to happen and if it deos when sorry im very scaraed


coco33
August 14th, 2009, 02:45 AM
according to what ha sbenn going on in this world and this link will also give info
here is proof
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III_(disambiguation)
also type in WWIII
on google

Glass Walker
August 14th, 2009, 02:52 AM
Since when was Wikipedia a reliable source?

I'd hope not, we should have learnt enough from the other two World Wars not to repeat such a useless thing. And besides, not even George W. Bush was stupid enough to start a World War III, so I don't think it's going to happen.

And what makes you think that anyone can tell you when a war is going to happen? None of us here are psychic, you know.....

Dragax67
August 14th, 2009, 03:09 AM
I've personally taken an interest into this matter. For there to be a World War Three, it would require some sort of very significant threat towards USA/UK by either the Russian Government, of which there hasn't been since the Cuban Missile Crisis in the Cold war, or a large-scale worldwide terror attack which may be retaliated with Nuclear Weapons. That may cause the war due to potential falldown which may destroy the planet, or due to the upcoming 2012 worlds end prediction, which over 90% of the human race may die, if the predictions by the many ancient civilisationsa and Nostrodamus are correct. This may be caused by Worldwide Market collapse, poverty, disease, natural disaster or... World War Three.

kohei
August 14th, 2009, 03:25 AM
WWIII cannot happen yet for one reason:

We do not have giant robots yet.

Forever
August 14th, 2009, 03:41 AM
"This poll will close on February 4th, 2015 at 06:47 PM"

... lol is that when WW3 is?

mhm yeah, don't think this thread will be moved to a place of discussion because... nobody wants WW3. XD; Plus... WW3 should at least be in about 10 years or something, according to the theory of war's being after depressions. So no need to worry ^____^

Went
August 14th, 2009, 06:05 AM
...I think Other Chat is way more appropiate than Other Trivia.

~Moved

Sweet Candace
August 14th, 2009, 06:16 AM
WWIII will most likely be every country against the countries that want to use nuclear weapons.

So it'd be US/UK/Germany/France/China/maybe Russia/Canada/etc. vs. the nuclear power countries that want to use them for bad things.

Timbjerr
August 14th, 2009, 06:16 AM
Yes, World War III will erupt very soon, and with it, the world will be engulfed in nuclear war. Blame Obama. >_>

[PS: If you couldn't detect the sarcasm, I pity you...]

Yamikarasu
August 14th, 2009, 06:17 AM
What? (People who type like this get on my nerves.)

If it does happen in the near future, I bet it will involve North Korea and Iran and nuclear weapons. Either that or an alien invasion.

Vyro
August 14th, 2009, 06:29 AM
Silly posters!

It won't be caused by aliens or anything else!

It will be caused when a super-retard named george gets elected president.

oh wait, that already happened.

No WWIII

Bejesus
August 14th, 2009, 06:33 AM
There probably will be at one point and now that we have bigger weapons it will be terrible. It's human nature (unfortunately). Not many people learn much from wars. The only thing the UK/USA has learnt from their wars is that they can win them (just). Whereas you look at somewhere like Japan who were nuked twice and apparently they are quite peaceful. I don't know those things for certain, nor much else on that matter, so forgive me if i am wrong.

Crimson Stardust
August 14th, 2009, 07:28 AM
lol..this will not happen as they must know that the last two wars cause a hefty damage to many countries..and if you say the news from the internet is reliable,check this,there is a news saying that 2012 is the day we die as firstly solar storm will hit us then after a while a planet called nibiru will colide with earth causing us to die..that was from the internet and are reviewed by scientist all around the world..xD Beat That

Azonic
August 14th, 2009, 07:33 AM
Since when was Wikipedia a reliable source?You guys reeeaally exaggerate the inaccuracy of Wikipedia. :| It is reliable, not 100% of the time of course, but what source is? Studies show that it's been more accurate than Britannica in some cases.

WWIII over gasoline? :o

Vyro
August 14th, 2009, 07:38 AM
Well... It is more likely than 2012.

oh, and the more I look at the thread title, the more it looks like a joke topic.

~*!*~Tatsujin Gosuto~*!*~
August 14th, 2009, 07:38 AM
i doubt it would happen and i do agree with Cherii with the wikipedia resource, but this is something serious, so I dont' believe it

Graceful
August 14th, 2009, 07:40 AM
My friend at school said about this. She says they might start a fight if we win something in the Olympics 2012. But....there is a 1% chance this will happen! XD

Naruto Uzumaki
August 14th, 2009, 07:42 AM
My friend at school said about this. She says they might start a fight if we win something in the Olympics 2012. But....there is a 1% chance this will happen! XD

We will never know until the war actually starts xD

Graceful
August 14th, 2009, 07:50 AM
We will never know until the war actually starts xD
Yeah....This is like Doomsday. Is it gonna happen? xD

Naruto Uzumaki
August 14th, 2009, 07:53 AM
Yeah....This is like Doomsday. Is it gonna happen? xD

Lol, Osma Binladen might me the starter of it o.o

kohei
August 14th, 2009, 08:00 AM
Well... It is more likely than 2012.

oh, and the more I look at the thread title, the more it looks like a joke topic.
Isn't it a joke topic to start off with?

BTW, WWIII will involve, in no particular order:
War for oil
An alien invasion or two
Mutant invaders from the 5th dimension
Takes place in the year 2012
Majestic-12 pulling the strings
Lovecraftian Gods
Virus-zombie apocalypse
Sentient machines hunting humans
Spirits of the dead possessing the living and making them savages, like Ghosts of Mars
Computer virus that shuts down the interwebs
Sharks on wheels with lasers
A cult of devil worshipers
Mecha-Osama
Some kind of totalitarian regime
That is all I can think of right now.
WWIV will involve irradiated cows too.

Zorua
August 14th, 2009, 08:02 AM
I'm standing firm on no, it isn't going to happen. America can be a stubborn country at times, but we know not to cross the line.

Bagel
August 14th, 2009, 08:21 AM
WWIII.....

I dought it. Its not something you should put much thought into.

Esper
August 14th, 2009, 08:30 AM
There will be no WWIII. Globalization, interconnected markets, etc. ensure that any war big enough to be called a World War would hurt anyone involved. We'll just have small wars (like in Georgia), repressive governments (like in Burma), and lawless states (like Somalia) to parcel out the death and suffering.

Crimson Stardust
August 14th, 2009, 08:38 AM
Lol, Osma Binladen might me the starter of it o.o
You can't just say he was the starter..maybe someone else was..xD

Avey
August 14th, 2009, 09:49 AM
I'm standing firm on no, it isn't going to happen. America can be a stubborn country at times, but we know not to cross the line.

Exactly. The countries involved in World War One and Two have learned from their mistakes. After all, if we have a World War Three, it'll be fought with nuclear missiles, and no one wants that because it means World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones.

dc_united
August 14th, 2009, 09:52 AM
WWIII will start when the UN decides to not tolerate N. Korea's crap and decide to napalm the country to teach Dear Leader a lesson.

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 11:38 AM
I do believe that WWIII will happen, and 2012 would be when I think it will commence, because something is supposed to happen in 2012, i'm sure most know that. And nowadays there are loads of nuclear weapons, especially Russia and America, and at the moment Russia kind of hate America, so a War between the two of them would mean WWIII, and I wouldn't be surprised if China were to join in, because they are comunist and would probably want to get all the power they can.
Well, thats really all I have to say about it at the moment.

Gumball Watterson
August 14th, 2009, 12:26 PM
"We do not know with what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but we do know WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Which means, who cares about WWIII, we are all gonna die if it happens so someone execute Bin Laden already.

The Scientist
August 14th, 2009, 02:41 PM
WWIII, eh? I doubt it'll happen anytime soon.

The prerequisite for a World War is that the first offending countries have lots of allies... Let's look at WWI: You had Austria and Serbia as the original offenders, and when Serbia got in trouble, its allies jumped in. When Austria saw it was outnumbered, its allies jumped in. This continued until the entire world was at war (except for Switzerland, those guys don't do anything).

Again, in WWII, replace Austria and Serbia with Germany and Poland.

While Korea may need to be squashed sometime soon, it doesn't have [many] supporters and allies, and you need many supporters and allies to truly have a world war.

Reck
August 14th, 2009, 03:13 PM
Hopefully not anytime soon... and who ever starts it should go to this website, eh? >LINK< (http://www.youfail.org/)(Be sure the sound is on)

Anyway on topic... though WW3 is most likely a inevitable thing. But it won't happen any time soon... i hope
(http://www.youfail.org/)

Zorua
August 14th, 2009, 05:12 PM
If WWIII is going to happen, then like, more than half the human population would probably be wiped out. Do you know how much firepower the world has now compared to the old days?

I think no one's ignorant enough to even think about trying this sorta thing.

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 05:15 PM
It's pretty clear that there'll be no "World War III". If a conflict rises between any of the major superpowers; there won't be much "world" left to wage war over~

Crimson Stardust
August 14th, 2009, 05:22 PM
I do believe that WWIII will happen, and 2012 would be when I think it will commence, because something is supposed to happen in 2012, i'm sure most know that. And nowadays there are loads of nuclear weapons, especially Russia and America, and at the moment Russia kind of hate America, so a War between the two of them would mean WWIII, and I wouldn't be surprised if China were to join in, because they are comunist and would probably want to get all the power they can.
Well, thats really all I have to say about it at the moment.
2012 will be the end of the world guys..you all know that something gonna happen on 2012,and it is when life as we knew ceased to exist..all the signs were clear,on 2012,the movies that will be screen is all about end of the world,go and check if you don't believe,and this is what i get....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_grBBl3Zsk&feature=related

You all gotta be scared of this...

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 05:23 PM
2012 will be the end of the world guys..you all know that something gonna happen on 2012,and it is when life as we knew ceased to exist..all the signs were clear,on 2012,the movies that will be screen is all about end of the world,go and check if you don't believe,and this is what i get....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_grBBl3Zsk&feature=related

You all gotta be scared of this...
Oh right! So when my 2009 calender ends; that's the end of the world, right? Because I wouldn't just use a new calendar for the next period of time like the Mayans planned to? 2012 prophecy is luzly.

Zorua
August 14th, 2009, 05:26 PM
Thats what they said about the Large Haldron Collider that was going to create black holes and suck up the Earth last year. Guess what? Didn't happen.

People also believed that 2000 would be the end of the world. Guess what? Didn't happen.

The whole 2012 thing is a stupid rumour that needs to stop spreading.

Crimson Stardust
August 14th, 2009, 05:31 PM
that is what i was intending to say,the source on the internet cannot be trust 100%...

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 07:55 PM
lol, how do I happen to start up the topic of 2012.
I know nothing happened at lots of the other times, but I really do believe something has to happen in 2012, when I think about 2012, I think of the side of Jesus coming and all that, it kind of goes into detail. xD
And the 2012 thing, another reason why I believe it is because it's even in the Bible.

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 08:04 PM
No, it's not in the bible. It's a silly myth referenced by the end of the Mayan Calender. Like I said, if I thought the world would end when my calender ended; I'd be afraid every New Years :P

Trap-Eds
August 14th, 2009, 08:08 PM
"We do not know with what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but we do know WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."


Hey, didn't Albert Einstein say that? I never really understood that quote.

If there was a World War 3, I really wouldn't be surprised. Humans fight over the craziest things-it'd just be a matter of time.

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 08:13 PM
Erm yes it is, and here what I mean: Click the spoiler.

Recorded in Matthew 24



http://kingjbible.com/clearrectangle.gif

1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. 3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying,

Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. 6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.

9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. 11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. 13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.

15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) 16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: 17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: 18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. 19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! 20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: 21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. 23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 25 Behold, I have told you before. 26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 28 For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.

29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: 33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. 34 Verily I say unto you, This generation [race] shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. 35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. 37 But as the days of Noe [Noah] were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. 41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. 43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.

44 Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not, the Son of man cometh.




----

Sourced from End of the world 2012 (http://www.endoftheworld2012.net/2012bibleprophecy.htm).

And thats a site completely about 2012.

And why do think it's silly, oh yeah, and the Mayan Calender is another reference, and why would it be put there if it's wrong?

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 08:21 PM
So because someone put a quote from the bible (that doesn't reference year at ALL) on a fansite about fanatics who think the world will end in 2012...that means the bible supports the fantasy? wut? haha.
It's not "put in the mayan calender". Did you do ANY research? It just happens to be the day the Mayan Longcount Calender *ends*. The same as OUR Calenders end on December 31st. THEY don't think it's the end of the world; they never did. It's just the date they mark the end of one age (like we mark the end of a year) and the ushering in of a new one. Again, did you read up on this at ALL?

twocows
August 14th, 2009, 08:22 PM
Since when was Wikipedia a reliable source?
Offtopic:
Sorry, you say something? (http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/online-encyclopedias-put-to-the-test/2005/12/14/1134500913345.html) Also, note that while Wikipedia had 4 errors for every 3 Britannica had, Wikipedia entries were 2.6 times longer (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/15/1352207), and thus the total error rate was actually far less for Wikipedia.

Also, the Wikipedia article doesn't make an argument one way or the other. It's not "proof" of anything, except that there are theories on how stuff will happen (which is obvious).

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 08:25 PM
Offtopic:
Sorry, you say something? (http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/online-encyclopedias-put-to-the-test/2005/12/14/1134500913345.html) Also, note that while Wikipedia had 4 errors for every 3 Britannica had, Wikipedia entries were 2.6 times longer (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/15/1352207), and thus the total error rate was actually far less for Wikipedia.

Also, the Wikipedia article doesn't make an argument one way or the other. It's not "proof" of anything, except that there are theories on how stuff will happen (which is obvious).
Doesn't change the fact that Academia doesn't recognize it as a valid source. In-fact; at many Universities if you quote Wikipedia as a source? You fail the entire unit.

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 08:25 PM
Did you bother clicking on the link? It clearly says at the top:
Does the Bible predict that the world will end in 2012?
No! But it does predict that it will end. And it describes some of the events leading up to that time. The following prophecy is just one of many prophecies in the Bible which speak of the end of the world.


And that did mention 2012. Also, you said it's a fansite, it's actually by people who are interested in it, I mean like, WHO would a fan, of the world coming an end, do you mean they all just want to die like that? =/

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 08:28 PM
Did you bother clicking on the link? It clearly says at the top:


And that did mention 2012. Also, you said it's a fansite, it's actually by people who are interested in it, I mean like, WHO would a fan, of the world coming an end, do you mean they all just want to die like that? =/
Most religious texts predict an end of days of some sort; but just because they do doesn't do ANYTHING to support the 2012 claim. It's like furries who claim that because many Disney films have Anthropomorphic characters that Disney is pro-furry. It's like lul-wut?

Stop. Spreading. Lies.

Thank you.

Zet
August 14th, 2009, 08:31 PM
I hope this so called 2012 end of the world thing only applies to the stupid. I can see a new smarter beginning for the world :3

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 08:37 PM
Most religious texts predict an end of days of some sort; but just because they do doesn't do ANYTHING to support the 2012 claim. It's like furries who claim that because many Disney films have Anthropomorphic characters that Disney is pro-furry. It's like lul-wut?

Stop. Spreading. Lies.

Thank you.

Hmm, your grammar slipped up a bit there, so it's hard to understand, and that text was not written by the people of that site, it's a quote from the Bible, do you not believe in Jesus? Because what you're saying makes me think so.

How am I spreading lies at all? I can't seem to see any lies that I am telling, and how would you even know it's lies that I am telling? Were you actually there when the Bible was written? You really don't know if it's lies or not, and you have nothing to back up that statement, and also you are unsure of this, you are going by what you think, therefore, I am not telling lies.

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 08:42 PM
There's nothing wrong with my grammar. The error is axshually with your comprehension; maybe you should pay more attention in school? :3 You're right; I don't believe in Jesus ~ I'm agnostic and proudly so. But that doesn't mean I haven't read your little bible; and it's pretty obvious that there is no mention in that passage (or anywhere in the text, actually) to the year 2012. Besides all this, belief in Jesus doesn't automatically entail belief or faith in the bible; the bible is written by man; afterall.

What these silly fanatics do is try to attribute anything that they can, retroactively; to support their claim. It's like any conspiracy theorist though; they make up rules and exceptions to suit their claim. It's all just drivel, really.

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 08:51 PM
I did not say that there was something wrong with your grammar, I said you had a slip-up, or as known as a typo.
Look at post 44, I showed a part which relates to the year 2012.

Silly? Can I ask where you get this from, because once again you are not sure of anything. Why would they go to the bother of doing it all then? If they weren't right then they would be idiots, which they are not.
You can even just type '2012' in Google and loads of things would come up, and I don't think they would be doing all of that for no reason.

twocows
August 14th, 2009, 08:54 PM
[...] it's pretty obvious that there is no mention in that passage (or anywhere in the text, actually) to the year 2012. Besides all this, belief in Jesus doesn't automatically entail belief or faith in the bible; the bible is written by man; afterall.

What these silly fanatics do is try to attribute anything that they can, retroactively; to support their claim. It's like any conspiracy theorist though; they make up rules and exceptions to suit their claim. It's all just drivel, really.
QFT.

To be honest, I'd rather worry about making life better now than worry about some giant nuclear crap-fest. That's not something I'll likely be able to affect. If it happens, then I'll do my best to help when that time comes; otherwise, it's a non-issue anyway.

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 08:58 PM
I did not say that there was something wrong with your grammar, I said you had a slip-up, or as known as a typo.
There was no typo in my post
Look at post 44, I showed a part which relates to the year 2012.
What you quoted there in #44 wasn't from the bible. Therefore you've yet to provide any proof that the bible says "the world will end in 2012"
Silly? Can I ask where you get this from, because once again you are not sure of anything. Why would they go to the bother of doing it all then? If they weren't right then they would be idiots, which they are not.
They are idiots.
You can even just type '2012' in Google and loads of things would come up, and I don't think they would be doing all of that for no reason.
Loads of things come up because loads of people believe; mistakenly; that there's something that will happen in 2012. Mostly due to misinformation. Remember, children ~
Belief != Fact

Only fact and truth prevail; and it's pretty obvious that here we are some 28 months away from this "magical date" and nothing is going to happen. If there was some great shift in the earth's axis; it would take place over HUNDREDS OF YEARS. A solar flare? We get hit by solar flares on a regular basis. A comet? Meteor? We'd have seen it coming for years. It's all been debunked and even decedents of the Mayans (the Mayan Calender being the *original* source for 2012 silliness) will tell you; there is no apocalypse predicted by the end of the Long Count Calender.

Repeating: The Mayan Longcount Calender does NOT predict the end of days. It ends because all things that are finite must have a start and an end. Does their Calender start at the dawn of time? No. Why should it end at the end of time?

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 09:12 PM
Oops. xD I didn't mean to say typo. >.<
Well I know it doesn't say it in the quote, but what else would that quote be warning you about? 2035? Which that year hasn't anything said about it. Or 2012 which loads of people on this planet believe that something will happen? And many people do believe that too, they believe that something has to happen, and lots believe it will be the end of the world, so you are going against millions of people on this planet.

Now what makes you be able to say that so straight? Is there anything actually saying that they are all idiots? That nothing will really happen? Well, loads of people do believe that they are not idiots and something will happen, and most of the rest really don't care at all, some don't even know. So why do you call them idiots?

Jesus would have known for sure, and do you think all the people all the way back then were idiots and were all mistaken, including Jesus was mistaken for writing the Bible? I think not.

Why should it not end at a certain time? I don't see why it shouldn't come to an end. =/

Anti
August 14th, 2009, 09:17 PM
I do believe that WWIII will happen, and 2012 would be when I think it will commence, because something is supposed to happen in 2012, i'm sure most know that. And nowadays there are loads of nuclear weapons, especially Russia and America, and at the moment Russia kind of hate America, so a War between the two of them would mean WWIII, and I wouldn't be surprised if China were to join in, because they are comunist and would probably want to get all the power they can.
Well, thats really all I have to say about it at the moment.

Russia sure doesn't hate us nearly as much as they used to, and they never blew us up during the Cold War because that would have meant the end of not just the United States but the Soviet Union as well. They have no reason to wipe the United States off the map, and just like before, they will be destroyed if they even try to attack us. It would basically be a suicidal move, so no one with a brain would let a conflict escalate to nuclear war.

As for China, they aren't really Communist. the government set up by Mao is still in power and isn't exactly an advocate of political freedom, but they have moved away from the fundamental parts of communism, so it's really communist in name only. Even if they were communist, it's not like being communist automatically means they're going to be an aggressor power willing to use nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union backed down during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and China, if they are smart at all, would do the same thing if tensions were to get that high.

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 09:23 PM
Oops. xD I didn't mean to say typo. >.<
Well I know it doesn't say it in the quote, but what else would that quote be warning you about? 2035? Which that year hasn't anything said about it. Or 2012 which loads of people on this planet believe that something will happen? And many people do believe that too, they believe that something has to happen, and lots believe it will be the end of the world, so you are going against millions of people on this planet.
Oh, I forgot. When the majority of people believe something; it's wrong and immoral to stand for truth and reason; right? In-fact, having ANY conflicting point of view against the majority is wrong, right? That's why revolutions never happen; governments never get overthrown and science never proves crackpots wrong, right? That's what you're putting out there.

Now what makes you be able to say that so straight? Is there anything actually saying that they are all idiots? That nothing will really happen? Well, loads of people do believe that they are not idiots and something will happen, and most of the rest really don't care at all, some don't even know. So why do you call them idiots?
Because they're getting riled up and obsessed over something with no physical grounding proof to support. Therefore; they're idiots.

Jesus would have known for sure, and do you think all the people all the way back then were idiots and were all mistaken, including Jesus was mistaken for writing the Bible? I think not.
I think we've already established that the Bible makes no reference to the year 2012. Or are you just not keeping up with the conversation, petal?

Comic Tragedy
August 14th, 2009, 09:43 PM
As for China, they aren't really Communist. the government set up by Mao is still in power and isn't exactly an advocate of political freedom, but they have moved away from the fundamental parts of communism, so it's really communist in name only. Even if they were communist, it's not like being communist automatically means they're going to be an aggressor power willing to use nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union backed down during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and China, if they are smart at all, would do the same thing if tensions were to get that high.

I agree with you thoroughly with your perspective on a Chinese threat. Sure China is communist, a huge country with power and massive population but that doesn't automatically mean they are evil, let alone a real threat. Just enforcing your point about communism not being automatically bad even further, Karl Marx believed he was spawning the idea of an Utopian society, not one of warmonger and headcases. I also believe, if given the choice, the Chinese would make the right decision and back down if a world wide nuclear cold war was to start. Now a days our technology is to powerful, and plain destructive for full on war. The war in Iraq, god bless them, is still only an insurgent fought war. Any educated boy or girl, and man or woman would realize that before supporting a world spread nuclear campaign.

The idea of a world wide nuclear spar is frightening to say the least. Apocalyptic might do it justice.

But lets stay warm hearted. xD

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 09:45 PM
I didn't mean having any conflict with the worlds majority is bad at all, but lots are smarter than you and also lots are smarter than most people, so they would be believable, did I put anything about science out there? I think now.

The Bible is a physical thing, and nobody would have been able to come up with this whole story, so yeah, there is physical proof.

Was doing a bit of looking around and it appears that the date 2012 is not in the Bible, read this (http://www.endoftheworld2012.net/armageddon.htm) for more information, the second part states that the date isn't in the Bible.

Oh and by the way, you can stop this if you want, because we are really going offtopic, as this thread is about WWIII and not 2012. =| (And I will keep going on. xD)

Bianca Paragon
August 14th, 2009, 09:47 PM
I didn't mean having any conflict with the worlds majority is bad at all, but lots are smarter than you and also lots are smarter than most people, so they would be believable, did I put anything about science out there? I think now.

The Bible is a physical thing, and nobody would have been able to come up with this whole story, so yeah, there is physical proof.

Was doing a bit of looking around and it appears that the date 2012 is not in the Bible, read this (http://www.endoftheworld2012.net/armageddon.htm) for more information, the second part states that the date isn't in the Bible.

Oh and by the way, you can stop this if you want, because we are really going offtopic, as this thread is about WWIII and not 2012. =| (And I will keep going on. xD)
The Bible is a physical work written by man. It's great fiction; but I've read better. To say that no man could write something with such an elaborate story is just closed-minded; creativity is what makes us human! I'm willing to put it be now, though ~ now that you've seen that the 2012 date isn't referenced at all in the Bible. I was just correcting that XD

Crimson Stardust
August 14th, 2009, 09:51 PM
There is an easy answer to all this,just chill out and have our fun and continue our life as normal as even if you think so much,it will not change anything,if it is going to happen,it will...xD

AtomicoExploda
August 14th, 2009, 09:59 PM
No, it's written by Jesus, the son of God, but I guess he was human at the time, but possessed way more power than any normal human. I guess someone could, but I don't see why they would go to bother of that.
Well actually, you don't believe in Jesus and you didn't think anything would happen, and it was all ridiculous, and I was correcting that, but I now do know that 2012 isn't referenced in the Bible, although that does not make me stop believing that Jesus will make his return in 2012 and the Anti-Christ will have power.
And.... I will stop now since this is Offtopic really. =S You have only won with one thing though. xD

Well, back on topic, I do think that WWIII will take place in 2012, as the Armageddon.

Forever
August 14th, 2009, 10:01 PM
... Sometimes I wish someone would explode the thought of 2012 ending the world rather than exploding people and countries in said world. :(

The Scientist
August 15th, 2009, 06:04 PM
Why has no one quoted my post?

Slash Beast ∞
August 15th, 2009, 06:13 PM
LOL.

Dude, I would be less worried about a World War 3. Besides, I don't see it happening anytime soon. I'm more worried abut getting ****ed on by that damn meteor.

That said, if we did have a WW3, I'd be hella scared. I've never lived in a period of a world war, and I damn sure don't want to now. We(Or whatever other country) would have to do some real messed up stuff to get in a WW3.

Scytheteen
August 15th, 2009, 07:27 PM
Eh, probably not.

The UN was created to avoid future world wars, and unless North Korea does something stupid, we probably won't.

America would probably not start another world war, because North Korea is basically the only enemy, and if we fight with Korea, we fight with China, which is suicide.

So I'm pretty sure there won't be a WW111, unless we piss off a major power like China, England, etc.

Anti
August 15th, 2009, 09:05 PM
Eh, probably not.

The UN was created to avoid future world wars, and unless North Korea does something stupid, we probably won't.

America would probably not start another world war, because North Korea is basically the only enemy, and if we fight with Korea, we fight with China, which is suicide.

So I'm pretty sure there won't be a WW111, unless we piss off a major power like China, England, etc.

China isn't going to back up North Korea unless they aren't the aggressor (and even then, ending the world in nuclear winter because of an outlaw regime probably isn't going to happen).

As much as we would never go to war with England since they've been our ally for decades, a war with China would be devastating. Still, I tend to believe that if we never went to war with the Soviet Union, we're probably not going to go to war with a country who we aren't nearly as at odds with. A lot would have to change internationally, much like how a lot changed from 1934 to 1939 as World War II was about to break out.

But I don't think North Korea is enough to start a world war :< No one is going to end the world for one of the worst (possibly the worst) regime on the planet. A lot would have to go wrong for World War III, luckily.

幕之内 一歩
August 16th, 2009, 09:08 AM
Those people saying World War Three will not happen are deluding themselves. It WILL happen eventually. Maybe not in our time, maybe not in our childrens time, maybe tomorrow. Who knows, but we're human, and someone somewhere will do something that will erupt into WW3.

I will say I either hope it happens after I'm dead and gone, or while I'm still alive and still able to take part. Not that I would enjoy it, but if WW3 were to pop off, I rather be young enough to do something about it and help defend my country and not be some old man that is just watching the world burn while I wait to die.

.little monster
August 16th, 2009, 09:40 AM
I doubt it will happen any time soon, right now everything is being handled quite well. However it is inevitable, so yes, it will happen. I don't think it will in the next 30 years (ish) though.

Samurai X
August 16th, 2009, 03:06 PM
I doubt it will happen any time soon, right now everything is being handled quite well. However it is inevitable, so yes, it will happen. I don't think it will in the next 30 years (ish) though.

I agree with you completely.

Also, nothing is going to happen in 2012 or on 12-21-2012, maybe a coincidental natural disaster at most. This is like Y2K v2, with even more hype.

Repeating: The Mayan Longcount Calender does NOT predict the end of days. It ends because all things that are finite must have a start and an end. Does their Calender start at the dawn of time? No. Why should it end at the end of time?

This text has been quoted for truth.

Zumi
August 16th, 2009, 03:39 PM
I watched something about 2012 weeks ago, and an ancient prophet said that there will be three violent blibs in the 20th-21st century. Theese are heavily speculated to be WWI, WWII and 2012 'WWIII'.

Shem
August 16th, 2009, 08:56 PM
Silly posters!

It won't be caused by aliens or anything else!

It will be caused when a super-retard named george gets elected president.

oh wait, that already happened.

No WWIII

we have had 3 presidents that I can think of named George, and obviously you shouldn't be talking because they were ALL smart enough to become president and I don't see you in the whitehouse.

In any case, hopefully we've learned from our mistakes and will be able stop another World War before it begins. And if there is a WWIII in my lifetime, I think I'll disapear into the Yukon to avoid the draft and hopefully any nuclear weapons brought into the equations.

kohei
August 17th, 2009, 06:00 AM
I just hope the world ending is induced by something cute.
A horde of exploding rabbits come to mind,

Yoshimi
August 18th, 2009, 02:21 AM
I didn't mean having any conflict with the worlds majority is bad at all, but lots are smarter than you and also lots are smarter than most people, so they would be believable, did I put anything about science out there? I think not.
No, but you actually used a logical fallacy, called ad populous.
Claiming that something must be true because many people believe it.
That's a shame that the fallacy holds no water, because you can just look back 2,000-3,000 years ago and see that almost everyone believed the earth was flat back then.

The Bible is a physical thing, and nobody would have been able to come up with this whole story, so yeah, there is physical proof.
I doubt you would say the same thing about the Quran, which has even more pages than the bible.

Was doing a bit of looking around and it appears that the date 2012 is not in the Bible, read this (http://www.endoftheworld2012.net/armageddon.htm) for more information, the second part states that the date isn't in the Bible.
The key in this is interpretation. What will you do if nothing happens during 2012? You will change your beliefs, and admit that your interpretation was wrong.

Oh and by the way, you can stop this if you want, because we are really going offtopic, as this thread is about WWIII and not 2012. =| (And I will keep going on. xD)
They aren't the same, but they aren't exclusive either.
This whole 2012 thing was based on Astrology, the very same one that tells you not to meet anyone when your favorite author is just down at the local library, if you are a Sagittarius of course.

Anywhodles, World War 3 is not out of the question, although it would be unlikely. The only countries that can do major harm is China and Russia. However, they are not ignorant of the fact that America can nuke them to oblivion. the other countries are just minor, because I'm sure we have a treaty with Britain.

Lastly, I don't remember the bible being written by Jesus. I'm pretty sure it was from his 12 apostles, but mostly by Paul.

darkraininja
August 18th, 2009, 08:04 AM
I dont believe WW3 will happen. If it did happen it would be over in 1 hour because all they have to do is press the red button that fires all the nukes. lol

Nuke
August 18th, 2009, 08:13 AM
It's unlikely.

WWII was caused because of some events of WWI. (While not all were I doubt that WWII would have happened if WWI hadn't) Obviously everything from WWII had been dead and buried and even if not it wouldn't start because of it now 60 years later. Obviously, there are other reasons why a third may start but if it did the probably UK/US/Many other allied countries would be too powerful for the threatning countries so they either wouldn't start it or it'd be over pretty quickly. Its pretty easy to move these days anyway so you could easily go to a peaceful country.

There are probably a few holes in my argument but I still conclude that WWIII is unlikely to happen in the near future.

SonicThrust
August 18th, 2009, 10:16 AM
First, a world war implies that a large number of countries are involved in the war which, as was mentioned once before in this thread, requires alliances. At this moment in time, there are no alliances in existence that could challenge the United States and the countries that would back them in war.

I would start to get nervous if, say, the old USSR countries and, perhaps, the non eastern EU countries of Europe formed an alliance/agreement similar to the European Union. In that way they could attempt to make themselves independent of the rest of the world and then a war might be possible.

As things stand now, I believe a world war is impossible since, due to the global economy, most countries rely on each other for trade of some kind. For example: China, who a couple people have brought up as possible aggressors. Why would China go to war with the US? What could it possibly have to gain by backing North Korea? That one action would completely destroy its customer base. I seriously doubt any country in the world makes China more money than the US does.

North Korea has also been brought up as a possible threat. They have no allies. If there is a war involving North Korea I doubt it could be considered a ‘World War’.

Russia is the last country I feel I need to address. First of all, it was the USSR that was involved in the cold war, not Russia alone, and when it was dissolved Russia lost some of its power. Unless something like the situation I mentioned above occurs I really don’t think Russia would do anything to start a war.

Of course this is just my opinion and how I see the world. Things could change or I could be completely wrong, but I just don’t see a World War happening anytime soon. (Wow this post got a lot longer than I thought it would...)

♣Gawain♣
August 18th, 2009, 07:37 PM
Maybe, maybe not. Unless Afghanistan started it... then...

Went
August 19th, 2009, 01:53 AM
Afghanistan? They are in the middle of a civil war to kick the most radical Islamic pro-terrorists out of the country, are about to have democratic elections and basically are keeping the law thanks to the NATO (aka the US, the EU and their allies). Why in hell would they start a world war now?