PDA

View Full Version : [B/W] Kangaskhan should get an abortion


Jerme
June 12th, 2010, 02:46 PM
it should be an evolution, and it is so fuel'd of rage from losing its baby and has the highest attack stat of any non legendary pokemon in the game. what do you think?

MistahDude
June 12th, 2010, 03:06 PM
it should be an evolution, and it is so fuel'd of rage from losing its baby and has the highest attack stat of any non legendary pokemon in the game. what do you think?

i think that this is WAY too controversial to be discussing

XxRogueTrainerxX
June 12th, 2010, 03:09 PM
i think that this is WAY too controversial to be discussing


I second that. Some Pokemon are better off with just one form.

HannahMontana
June 12th, 2010, 03:29 PM
Aside from the very fail first post (trying to be edgy but just...not), I cannot comprehend why anyone wants a pre-evo of anything.

Wow, it hatches from an egg and has a baby. Now, because everything else in Pokemon makes PERFECT sense (like a fish evolving into an octopus), I demand that we waste a Pokemon on making a pre-evo for Kangaskhan.

While we're at it, let's make a pre-evo to link Tauros and Miltank! Because that is totally necessary and not a waste!

Black Mage
June 12th, 2010, 03:37 PM
This thread is just... no.