PDA

View Full Version : pkmn diamond &pearl release date revealed


bryans
December 25th, 2005, 10:45 PM
I was just searching around the net on YAHOO and I searched for pkmn diamond&Pearl release date. AND Bam a section titled pkmn d&p release date is 12/31/05. I really dont know if its true but ,its most likely to be true because it was in AOL's game news section amd it even had loads of message boards filled with official game reviews from reviewers.AND Im not talkin just about 2or 3 it has about 9 reviews.I found this info on 12/25/05. Before you get to any conclusions go to YAHOO and search for [pokemon diamond release date 12/31/05] and it will be next to a section from Aol.com just click and it will take you there in a heartbeat. PS please excuse me for being so dramatic im just nervouse and excited caus ei can get it on relaes for my birthday wich is today {12/26/05}. PLEASE GET BACK WITH ME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO TELL ME WHAT YOUVE ALL HAVE FOUND .OUT

Supreme Edgeboy Max
December 26th, 2005, 12:41 AM
31st December 2005? That's impossible. And I've looked up the AOL page you were talking about.
http://videogames.aol.com/game_main?gameID=24163
And there it says:

Release Date: 12/31/05
Publisher: Nintendo
Developer: Game FreakJust how can you be sure that AOL is correct? Just by looking around in more well informed places. Pokemon Palace, Serebii.NET and Pokemon Elite 2000 - three of the most well updated websites, do not have it as a release date.
Now, with all the releases of Pokemon Trozei and Pokemon Mysterious Dungeon, do you think Nintendo can simply release this game .. not to mention the English versions, suddenly on New Year's Eve if its not even out in Japan yet? Japan itself gets Diamond and Pearl release sometime late 2006.

I'm sorry, but your information is wrong. And furthermore, wrong forum. I believe this goes in Dual Generations. This has been reported.

Chairman Kaga
December 26th, 2005, 07:26 AM
Yes, this goes in the Dual Generations forum, but if the information is incorrect, any debate on it would be pointless, so this warrants a lock.

*closed*