PDA

View Full Version : why isn't aerodactyl considered a dragon pokemon


adeebsworld
July 24th, 2006, 07:10 PM
why isn't aerodactyl considered a dragon pokemon its been on Lance's team since the original red and blue games and in fire red and leaf green if u go to pewter city and u talk to an old man right by the aerodactyl exhibit he'll say he's lucky to see the bones of a dragon
but after all that aerodactyl is considered a rock/flying type shouldn't they change it to a dragon type?

Astinus
July 24th, 2006, 11:09 PM
It's the same thing with Gyarados. A Water/Flying type that is more Dragon-esque. For some strange reason, it was thought better to have Aerodactyl be a Rock/Flying. I don't know about anyone else, but I rather like the Rock/Flying typing. It fits Aerodactyl better.

The Water/Flying that Gyarados is... It just makes me sad. ;-; The evolution of one of my favorite Pokés gets a 4x weakness to Electric.

adeebsworld
July 24th, 2006, 11:16 PM
Aerodactyl should be a rock/dragon type it would be awesome u could have besides it would still be able to learn attacks like wing attack because it has wings
yeah rock/dragon is a lot better

Bleach and Sunshine
July 24th, 2006, 11:49 PM
Aerodactyl is more on the dinosaur side so Rock/Flying. It is just like Gyarados with a dragon gene. It is similar but not the full 100% precent.

shanecdavis
July 25th, 2006, 12:09 AM
Dinosaurs and Sea Serpents are NOT Dragons. That is why they aren't classified as such.

Enokoro
July 25th, 2006, 12:14 AM
Dinosaurs and Sea Serpents are NOT Dragons. That is why they aren't classified as such.
Dragonari and dratini are sea serpants,but theyre consdered dragons.

Doopliss
July 25th, 2006, 02:22 AM
Meh, I thought Dragons had scales? So um, I believe dinosaurs are considered dragons or reptilic, like Dragons are. But that's my say. Ignore the pitiful little person that is talking which is me.

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 02:35 AM
the reason dratini and dragoniair r considered dragons is because they evolve to dragonite the most powerful dragon in pokemon
and have u noticed that they have part of the word dragon in there name

Kenji~
July 25th, 2006, 03:46 AM
Its a resurected fossil. Fossil=Rock
It flies. Flying.

Pterodactyl=Dinosaur
Dinosaur=/=Dragon

Its not really supposed to be a dragon pokemon.

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 03:48 AM
I See Your Point But U Still Can't Forget That Lance Uses It And He Uses Strictly Dragon Pokemon Except For Gyrados But Who Cares About Gyrados Its Retarted I Know I'm Losing This War Anyways But In My Opinion It Should Still Be A Dragon/rock

Kenji~
July 25th, 2006, 04:00 AM
I really don't care...I never use Aerodactyl...so it doesn't really matter to me what the type is.

enyce
July 25th, 2006, 04:03 AM
Because game freak made them like that. Its that simple.

Grand:::Master:-:420
July 25th, 2006, 04:12 AM
Also all other fossile pokemon in these games are all rock.so it makes more sense for him to be a flying/rock than any others.
Read profile.

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:14 AM
i get the point that its rock but for flying scizor has wings and it is considered bug/steel
and venomoth has wings and it is considered bug/poison

Grand:::Master:-:420
July 25th, 2006, 04:21 AM
Yes but there styles, attackes, weaknesses all contribute to him being steel and bug.syther is bug so he had to be a bug type and he woundnt be the type of pokemon to know fly.

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:25 AM
what about blazeikin its part bird buts its not considerd a part flying

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:27 AM
at this point i get the idea of it being flying ( i have the entire time) but dont u think it could be part dragon i mean i get the flying type it even learns wing attack but dont u think it could be part dragon?

Grand:::Master:-:420
July 25th, 2006, 04:27 AM
Yes but once again if you look at the position that the game creaters are in it would not make sense to make it flyng seeing how the second evolution does not have a trace of flying

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:28 AM
it does not evole into anything
what r u talking about????

Grand:::Master:-:420
July 25th, 2006, 04:29 AM
you would find it in its genes if it was.

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:31 AM
okay.. grandmaster u seem the only one that really cares at this point i give u win
but please write in my other posts and also in my future posts
but i do have a new idea what if charizard was part dragon it was on lance's squad back in G/S/C (just kidding) but seriously sign in my other posts

MegaLightBlaze
July 25th, 2006, 04:31 AM
what about blazeikin its part bird buts its not considerd a part flying
One simple reason: Chickens Don't Fly.

Grand:::Master:-:420
July 25th, 2006, 04:32 AM
Combusken


I love mySHEDININJA

INVINCIBLE with me in control

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:34 AM
visit my other threads people i don't care about aerodactyl anymore
SOME OF MY THREADS THERE R SOME ON PAGE 1 AND 2

enyce
July 25th, 2006, 04:34 AM
One simple reason: Chickens Don't Fly.

Yeah, they get their heads cut off and deep fried.

adeebsworld
July 25th, 2006, 04:36 AM
i am happy to say that this is the thread with the most posts on it thank u for making this happen

The Hunk
July 25th, 2006, 11:30 AM
This thread is crazy. Yall need to stop spamming. Spamming is against the rules, and adeebsworld is not the only one spamming. Aerodactyl is not a dragon Pokemon, and no matter how much we fight we can't change a simple fact.

CLOSED