PDA

View Full Version : Would you catch all pkmn? (If they were real of course)


CHaRiSMa
February 7th, 2007, 09:44 AM
I wouldn't. Because I like all pkmn in general but I wouldn't want to have them all because I just don't like them all. Both in fighting and appearance. I would only catch all pkmn if this was the only way for me to become a pkmn master.

Legendary Squirtle
February 7th, 2007, 10:11 AM
No, cause why bother have all the pokemon if your only going to use 7 or 8 of them. Some of them must be extremly common in on area but rare in another, I would only go out of my way to find pokemon I would actually use in a battle.

Vendour
February 7th, 2007, 01:42 PM
No I wouldnt. Id only catch the 10 that I plan on being partners with. I have no reason to try and catch them all. Not to mention theres A LOT of Pokemon and it'd most likely be impossible to catch them all anyway, especially when it comes down to the legendaries.

C.J.
February 8th, 2007, 02:33 PM
Hell no. That would be nearly impossible.

~*!*~Tatsujin Gosuto~*!*~
February 8th, 2007, 03:01 PM
No because I'll catch the ones that are important to me and the ones I like, all of the ghost type Pokemon, Venusaur, Blaziken, Swampert, Zapdos, Marowak and Donphan

:t354:~*!*~Queen Boo~*!*~

CHaRiSMa
February 9th, 2007, 05:18 AM
Hell no. That would be nearly impossible.

Yeah, I forgot to mention that^-^

Ayano Katagiri
February 9th, 2007, 08:14 PM
Nope, I wouldnt. I would only get my favourites~

Fiver
February 10th, 2007, 04:23 AM
No. I would only catch the pokemon that I would be using in battle such as Farfetch'd - definitely a pokemon I'd want to catch, as well as Wartortle, Growlithe and Scyther.

Aegis
February 10th, 2007, 05:56 AM
I'd only cath the ones I want. I might catch some others if they wanted to be caught, but most likely only the ones I want.

Forever
February 10th, 2007, 10:33 PM
I'd mainly catch my favourites, then consider getting all of the rest.

Live in Color
February 10th, 2007, 11:04 PM
I'd catch some that look cute/cool for contests, and other for battles.

Warheart
February 11th, 2007, 12:07 PM
I'd probably become real interested at first, and look high and low for everyone one, then after countless, aggrivating hours of not finding what I was looking for, give up...

I'd catch only the one's I REALLY liked, too much responsibility; i'd be like having 400 pets.

Kotowari
February 12th, 2007, 07:54 AM
NO, I won't catch them all. It's already hard in the games, and it must be even harder in the real world. through every weather, every environment, no, All is impossible. And I don't know if the legendaries would even obey a normal trainer. There would possibly be to few Masterballs for everyone.

I'd only get the Pokemon I really want. I think it's sad for the Pokemon to be caught by someone who never uses them.

Virtual Headache
February 12th, 2007, 08:15 AM
No.
Since I'd already be occupied enough traning my favourite ones.

Jim
February 12th, 2007, 09:04 AM
I'd go for 6... Well unless they did have a storage system. I like the way Ash Trains up his Pokemon on his Team for AGES and then when he gets to a League/Frontier he just gets Kingler, Tauros, Snorlax and Muk out of Storage (Which are always stronger than his Team Pokemon dispite the fact they're never trained)

CHaRiSMa
February 12th, 2007, 10:05 AM
I think it's sad for the Pokemon to be caught by someone who never uses them.

That's true too. It would be useless for the pkmn to just catch them to make a collection.

Max210
February 12th, 2007, 01:51 PM
my team would be: plusle, pikachu, weavile, lucario, and mime jr. and while they werent with me, id leave them at my house, so that way they had fresh air. pokeballs are cruel :P

Aether
February 12th, 2007, 06:28 PM
no, in fact all i really need is 6, i mean ALL OF THEM??? thats a little hard to manage -_-

Shiny Umbreon
February 12th, 2007, 06:33 PM
I'd at least catch six for my party, five for contests and maybe breed to get better ones (if I could know their natures and IVs).

It would be nearly impossible, but I'd be a challenge! I would try.

Shiny Umbreon
February 12th, 2007, 06:34 PM
Sorry for double posting, but my computer got lagged up and it just posted twice!

Frostweaver
February 14th, 2007, 01:42 AM
You can use the edit button, and there's a delete post somewhere for you to delete double post as a result of lag ^^;

I'll catch even less than 6... I mean, a dog in real life is hard enough to handle. Two is possible but harder... now add in magical effects with hyper energetic energy, and there's 6 of them!? o.O; Besides the bonus that they can be stored in pokeballs at night (now isn't that convenient to steal in a break-in ><) to save space, life will be *hectic.*

Some Pokemon are truly unrealistic and impossible to feed either... Let's not even think about Snorlax. Just a Charizard.. what do you feed that thing and how much will it cost a day? o.O;

Let's stick with Zigzagoons to dig me those nuggets ^^

Nuke
February 18th, 2007, 10:51 AM
Hmm.. I wouldnt because it would probably be almost impossible in 1 liftetime.

Besides, Some pokemon I just dont like.

Linoone
February 18th, 2007, 11:01 AM
nah, just the ones I like, about 6, to make my team and that's it o!o

Cloud_boy
February 18th, 2007, 11:58 AM
Does shooting them with a gun and hanging them as trophies count?

CHaRiSMa
February 20th, 2007, 07:03 AM
Some Pokemon are truly unrealistic and impossible to feed either... Let's not even think about Snorlax. Just a Charizard.. what do you feed that thing and how much will it cost a day? o.O;


Come to think of it.. you have a point there.. I mean a Snorlax and a Charizard?? o___O And imagine having Wailord.. I mean wales need to be in the water all the time.. and a Wailord is just soooo big! Who knows how much it needs to eat?!


Maybe if pkmn were real there would also be special food or something that would make them easiliy fed - like reallly small cookies who would contain all the basic vitamins, albumin etc. ... :P

Hallows
February 20th, 2007, 08:23 PM
Nah, I wouldn't try to catch them all. If I wasn't bombarded with the slogan 'Gotta catch 'em all' all the time I doubt the thought would have even crossed my mind. I'd build up a small team of pokemon. Luckily none of my favourites are too high maintenance. :]

goofy_charizard_girl
February 26th, 2007, 09:52 AM
I guess I wouldn't, because I don't even think that I could. I mean, I think I would have to travel whole my life to do that (you know, with new pokemon appearing and all the locations I'd have to visit... Not to mention the lengedaries who are VERRY hard to catch) and I am not sure that I'd want to do so. I also don't have a wish to collect all of them.

Billiken
February 26th, 2007, 02:07 PM
i wouldn't catch all the pokemon. it would be putting them in the same class as trading cards. i would probably catch the pokemon i wanted for my team and then any others i liked, and i would have a close relationship with all of them.

Crimson Arcanine
February 26th, 2007, 02:24 PM
I don't know. I don't think i could take care of heaps of pokemon so I'd probably catch what i like best or whats reasonably common as well. But I gotta have my very own Vulpix or Ninetales. Thats a must for me!

marz
February 26th, 2007, 03:03 PM
Nah, there are some pokemon I have a dislike to. Not all pokemon are great, and some can be pretty intimidating.

~Seadra~
February 26th, 2007, 06:48 PM
Of course not. I'd never be able to take care of all of them, and just making them lie around in pokéballs (or on some professor's ranch or whatever) would be cruel. And, realistically, wouldn't catching some of the legendaries throw nature all out of whack? Say I had a Kyogre and a Groudon - the two are still going to be enemies even if they're under my "control." Not to mention I highly doubt the power of badges from the games would work in real life, so that'd be even more chaotic... (Really, what kind of animal {for lack of a better word} would see a piece of metal and decide that meant the trainer was all-powerful? I always hated how that part of the game worked; I'd almost rather see pokémon come to respect the trainer through actual experience, rather than the magic of badges. >>)

The idea of trying to feed them all made me laugh; good thing none of the games make us worry about that, eh?

CHaRiSMa
February 27th, 2007, 02:07 AM
Not to mention I highly doubt the power of badges from the games would work in real life, so that'd be even more chaotic... (Really, what kind of animal {for lack of a better word} would see a piece of metal and decide that meant the trainer was all-powerful? I always hated how that part of the game worked; I'd almost rather see pokémon come to respect the trainer through actual experience, rather than the magic of badges. >>)


Yeah, you're right, I like your idea. It was just like with Charizard and Ash, when Ash had to gain his respect. I think pkmn should behave like Charizard. Well not burn the pkmn trainers or attack them in any other way (at least I wouldn't like that.. xD) but wait to see if they can really trust their trainer. Like in real life when you meet someone.. you don't just trust him right away, right?


BTW this is really off topic.. but I love your sig pic ~Seadra~!

Prince Roserade
March 5th, 2007, 04:53 PM
Nope, no way. There's only a few Pokes I like, and there's only so many I'd be able to take care of. It's like pets, you know? Plus there's far too many Pokes - one would have to be millionaire to feed them all. And out of the bunch there's a lot of ugly ones, huge ones, and a few that I simply dislike.

So yeah, I'd only catch the ones I'd use and take care of. ^^

Captain Arcane
March 13th, 2007, 01:13 AM
Oh, no no no no no, never, I would just try to catch the ones I want.

mewtwo9999
March 13th, 2007, 12:07 PM
i pick quality over quantity and id probably aim for the ones im most interested in