View Full Version : Kangaskhan?
ChrisG14
June 18th, 2007, 02:07 PM
Does anyone find it strange that when you hatch a Kangaskahn Egg, there's a baby already inside its pouch. I mean, it's a newly hatch Pokemon, yet it has a baby inside it already. I mean, it's just a bit, creepy, do you think?
Erimgard
June 18th, 2007, 05:06 PM
hahaha it's like those creatures in star treck...crap can't remember there names...but they are born pregnant and quickly multiply.
yeah it is a little weird....kinda like how there are now female Mr. Mimes.
Nationalpokedexcompleter
June 18th, 2007, 11:00 PM
Um...I think its weird as soon as its born its an adult and it already has a baby I mean come on its just plain freaky!
AztecSunshine
June 19th, 2007, 06:49 AM
very very waird i thout when i was a kid that there well be no baby when it hatches but it did had one lol
~*!*~Tatsujin Gosuto~*!*~
June 19th, 2007, 11:32 AM
I also found this weird as well. i thought this generation (4th generation) they will make the baby a new pkmn
:t354:TG
Storm-DC
June 19th, 2007, 03:56 PM
it's just like EVERY cubone finds his dead mother's skull to wear..
also, then there should be a new pokemon with a natural head in the form of cubone's skull to be it's mother..
Nicku
June 19th, 2007, 06:42 PM
I never thought that ... But yeah, it is creepy ._.
- Nicku
Ichida
June 19th, 2007, 06:55 PM
Yeah, I expect they'll be making a separate, Baby-form of Kangaskhan, and give it some lame name, like Kangaskid or something.