The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > ♪Twiggy♪
Register New Account FAQ/Rules Chat Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices



Conversation Between ♪Twiggy♪ and Archer
Showing Visitor Messages 51 to 60 of 269
  1. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 04:02 PM
    ♪Twiggy♪



    The photo of the monitor from the bottom... wow.

    It's like a revelation.

    *just notices that he got a bit too excited and posted several VMs in a row*

    ---

    Hmm... The monitor was set up with dynamic contrast enabled out of the box, named "SmartContrast". For some reason I never noticed the backlight intensity changes, unlike the Samsung display I had with my now-dead desktop. Guess given time, even that becomes good and worthy of being left on.

    But still... *disables it*

  2. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 03:09 PM
    ♪Twiggy♪
    *sets up HDMI audio passthrough*

    *plugs in stereo speakers to the monitor's audio out*

    *Taylor Swift*

    For a moment, when I pulled a black-to-white gradient on Paint.NET, I saw lots of steps.

    Zooming in reveals that the display is showing the difference between, well, pretty much every step, and that the display is displaying it as-is without dithering. All the ugly truths uncovered by a better monitor. This got verified when I went to monitor test sites. (Paint.NET is not capable of dithering gradients, unlike GIMP or Photoshop)

  3. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 02:46 PM
    ♪Twiggy♪
    Pretty much the only fault I have with the monitor is nitpicky - calibration is loaded using a separate program at boot, so the display uses the accurate colour profile after the computer boots completely, unlike how Windows "fixes" my MacBook Air's screen as soon as I log in.

  4. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 02:30 PM
    ♪Twiggy♪
    Seems like the HD3000 breaks no sweat in handling a 1080p desktop. Then again, anything these days won't.

  5. Archer
    October 7th, 2012 02:13 PM
    Archer
    In most countries, bad pixels are covered under warranty. But good to hear.

  6. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 01:25 PM
    ♪Twiggy♪
    I've just done further testing, and I came up with zero dead or stuck pixels.

  7. Archer
    October 7th, 2012 01:21 PM
    Archer
    Yep. 1366x768 is horrible. I even prefer 1280x800, because there's extra height and it displays 720p content without scaling (and 2560x1440 works similarly being 4x720p), although there is letterboxing, but that leaves space from controls/menus.

    The Pros have much better screens from a quality perspective - I think it's the anti-glare coating on the Airs that cuts down the saturation. Though I don't understand why the 13" Pros STILL have 1280x800. 1440x900 should be a MINIMUM, although I expect 2560x1600 retina displays on them soon, which are incidentally the same res as the 30" Dells.

    Couldn't say. It's certainly a big component of the power usage, for sure. Most of that is actually the backlight. I never really gave much time to using my mac on an external screen, as mine and my old 22" 1080p monitor don't get along and I have no intention of forking out for a Dual-Link DVI adapter for my current screen.

  8. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 01:11 PM
    ♪Twiggy♪
    1920x1080 24bpp is already a significant improvement from 1366x768 18bpp /w visible dither, no?

    I've certainly noticed! Turns out, it isn't my phones are oversaturated - it was the MacBook Air's that's undersaturated! The display's now much closer to what I'm getting on the phones.

    It was painful, but after the second try with it, everything works now, with all gamma blocks looking blended in!

    I've also replaced my printer inks with XL carts :D

    (Hey, if the laptop doesn't have to power its own display, do you think I'll see at least 5 hours accidentally unplugged?)

    ---

    Lazy way to see if a panel is TN or IPS: squat. If the screen inverts, it's a TN. (This screen never inverts.)

  9. Archer
    October 7th, 2012 01:01 PM
    Archer
    Sounds nice. :D I couldn't go back to anything with less that 2560x1440 resolution for a desktop screen, though. And they're still so hard to get.

    Can't help you with calibration, sorry. I've always used the Windows default tool to make it look right for my eyes and left it at that. Either way, an IPS screen will have much richer colours than cheaper TN panels even without calibrating. :cer_nod:

    Enjoy!

  10. ♪Twiggy♪
    October 7th, 2012 11:42 AM
    ♪Twiggy♪
    Hooooooooooooooly caaaaaaaaaarp

    I just bought a Philips IPS monitor in-store along with adaptor after I got hooked on what I'm looking at, and at SGD 250 including HDMI cables, DVI cables, VGA cables, and a miniDisplayPort-to-HDMI adapter... (I use my eyes to pick monitors. I don't deal with online reviews. Some things are best seen in person.)

    In fact, I'm using it right now, and my eyes feel much better now, having things to be bigger AND having more screen real estate.

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~

    (Even more el cheapo than your monitor, and comes with three years of warranty.)


    6-point colour calibration, on the other hand... HAEEEEEEEEEELP


All times are UTC. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Style by Perdition Haze, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on TwitterMessage Board Statistics | © 2002 - 2013 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to Pokémon USA, Inc. and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company, Pokémon USA, Inc., The Pokémon Company International, or Wizards of the Coast. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2013 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User posts belong to the user.