Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > EngSpringer

Notices
For all updates, view the main page.



Conversation Between EngSpringer and TwilightBlade
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 10
  1. TwilightBlade
    February 8th, 2011 11:17 AM
    TwilightBlade
    Quote originally posted by ROC:
    Pokemon species: Roserade
    OT: Mat
    ID NO: 48509
    Place obtained: Egg hatched “route 34”
    Hacked Pokemon.
    Note(s): This Pokemon was originally legit (RNGer: Mat924). It has since been edited from the original. The nickname of the Pokemon has been changed externally (etc. PokeSav) resulting in invalid data.

    Pokemon species: electivire
    OT: Mat
    ID NO: 48509
    Place obtained: egg hatched “route 34”
    Hacked Pokemon.
    Note(s): This Pokemon was originally legit (RNGer: Mat924). It has since been edited from the original. The nickname of the Pokemon has been changed externally (etc. PokeSav) resulting in invalid data
    http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showpost.php?p=2682133&postcount=6
    I've seen stuff like that about Mat's Pokemon. I've received a hatched Togepi obtained on Route 34 and hatched on Route 34. It lacks Day care couple.

    Perhaps, someone else is editing them. Or, he has. I don't know. I believe Mat said that his Togepi, Manaphy, and a third Pokemon have bad data because of extraction issues. However, I don't encounter problems with extracting to files. At the end of they day, I just toss them. I hope this helps; maybe you can decide on your own to collect Mat's Pokemon or find substitutes.
  2. EngSpringer
    February 8th, 2011 10:38 AM
    EngSpringer
    Hi Thanks for your reply. However, I'm a bit confused. Mat admits that Arceus is hacked and never tried to claim it was anything else. None of his other pokemon have ever failed a hack check. I asked RoC if he knew what you were referring to and he's adamant that none of Mat's pokemon are hacked. As far as "heavily edited" what exactly are you talking about and which pokemon are suspect. RoC and Mat are both in the dark about this claim. There were some of his legit pokes that were altered by other users. (A risk all trainers take when their pokemon are traded away from their control). Otherwise I'm clueless as to your reasoning. Would appreciate it if you could expand a little. Thanks.
  3. TwilightBlade
    February 2nd, 2011 09:18 PM
    TwilightBlade
    hi, i am very sorry for the delay, ive been hit by some kinda wicked storm.

    i have checked latios and latias, they are technically legal. however, i have some suspicions with owner Mat. he abused a shiny arceus, which is not allowed on pokecommunity. he also has some heavily edited pokemon. although some individual pokemon are legal and others are hacked, i consider Mat's collection to be totally worthless because of these past tendencies...
  4. EngSpringer
    January 29th, 2011 06:08 PM
    EngSpringer
    Hi. Don't mean to bother you and hope studying/exams are going well. Just wondered if you would get a chance to look at those hack checks. Thanks.
  5. TwilightBlade
    January 24th, 2011 08:49 PM
    TwilightBlade
    Thankies. ^_^
    Results will take a day since I'm studying.. :(
  6. EngSpringer
    January 24th, 2011 08:10 PM
    EngSpringer
    Thanks. Love the avatar by the way
  7. TwilightBlade
    January 24th, 2011 08:05 PM
    TwilightBlade
    Cool, thanks. Its 2278 8850 1101 heart gold.
  8. EngSpringer
    January 24th, 2011 08:04 PM
    EngSpringer
    I've entered your FC from the OP of your thread and will wait in WiFi. Thanks
  9. EngSpringer
    January 24th, 2011 08:00 PM
    EngSpringer
    Yes please
  10. TwilightBlade
    January 24th, 2011 07:56 PM
    TwilightBlade
    Hi, may you trade for the hack check now? :)

All times are UTC -8. The time now is 11:51 PM.