I can understand that. It must be a touch and go project, I would imagine. You really have to be sensitive enough for emerging raters, but informative enough for the regulars. That's a very delicate line, considering the drastic differences between the parties. Not to mention any grey area that might be in there.
Still, if you ever want a second set of eyes to do some proof-reading or someone to do menial tasks, I'm happy to help however I can. ^o^ I really want everyone to know how great this is. I think you, Wolf, (and Aura, however I do not know to what extent) are doing a wonderful thing here. This is exactly what our precious CBC needs and you should all be very proud of yourselves.
Good luck that SAT, man. That's hard stuff no matter what you're doing or planning on doing, for the matter. But as long as you work hard, you're bound to do well. :)
Your zeal is inspiring. I appreciate it! I won't really be able to get started though until about a week from now because I'm prepping for SAT reading (score too low to get into the school I want) but then I'll be good. The problem in the past has been the wording - it's difficult to balance encouraging people to make thorough rates without it being too intimidating (a ton of people have rating inferiority complexes :o) so yeah haha.
Hey Anti! I read that you've been working on the majority of the new Rating Guide and Resource sticky.
I just want to offer my unconditional support. It's a great thing that you and Wolf are doing, but an equally great task. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I'm happy to do anything to help the CBC. :)