Actually, I would call this an accusation:
It means I'm the kind of person who would call you an overdramatic hypochondriac. I respond by saying I never said any such thing. =/ In fact, I don't doubt you have the symptoms you say you do. It's whether or not you got your diagnosis 100% correct that worries me.
But that's beside the point. The reason why I started in that first post (and I certainly was not the first one to point out that you're probably best going to a doctor, nor do I really have enough pull in the community to get CWTA,P to come out and say something along the same lines) is to take a quote that you bolded yourself and help you put things into perspective. In other words, yes, I read the thread thoroughly and read about what you're looking for, but even then, what people were offering were actually pretty valid solutions from the perspective of someone who's just going on what you offered as background information. Some of the stuff (like who this person is and why they'd flip if they found out you were trying to get professional help for a problem) is pretty vague, so it's really not surprising that we'd offer probably one of the most basic responses to a medical issue one could give. In other words, if you're accusing me of not reading, I did, which is entirely why I responded -- to help you put things into perspective and make a decision that could end a lot of potential misery. You already were getting pretty miserable over arguing against the people who kept saying go to the doctor before I even entered the thread.
Also, because you've called people who offered the wrong kind of advice immature (some immature enough to even take it to another level) and said that if we're going to continue to give you the same advice, we might as well leave your thread (If you don't agree with me, then you could have simply ignored this thread.) and that we quite possibly don't give a damn about you (or maybe you all just don't give a damn.), it should be noted that it doesn't look like you're open for suggestion from their viewpoint. If you didn't mean all that, rather than accuse everyone else of misinterpreting you, it might be a good idea to give your posts another once-over to see if there's anything that could be considered accusing the people posting in your thread of saying things or taking up attitudes they never actually said or meant. Just saying this to save yourself the trouble of creating a somewhat circular argument in which people respond to the way you're talking to them with more arguments and insults.
Alternatively, considering you've gotten your answer (or a number of possible ones and probably the only ones you're going to get out of the people there, judging by what the conversation has shifted to), perhaps it's best to just ignore any further responses that you don't like (like any of them that sound like they're accusing you of something). I know it sounds rather hypocritical from someone who took the time to take you aside via VMs, but if you're dealing with a lot of **** right now, why aggravate it by responding? At this point, you've said what you had to say about doctors, so it's on record. If anyone responds to that with anything less than what you've expected, then you might as well forget it.
As for myself, I'll respond to whatever VM you want to send me out of politeness. *shrug*