FreakyLocz14

And, as you answered with gibberish of your own, I pointed towards our good friend the Spam acronym.

It fits those categories.

why are you spamming mine

lolololol

lol if you define failure as the inability to perfectly anticipate the future state of the economy, then you have a pretty weak argument. If anything, deride the stimulus for the tax cuts it included that led to that mild positive effect.

What I ask of you is what your position is on future stimulus spending; do you consider future stimulus spending to be met with similarly mild growth as the recent one, or do you hold it to be the case that a "smarter" stimulus would result in really turning the economy around?

Hello there, it's been a while since we last spoke.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...bibJ_blog.html

This article discusses 9 different studies that have been conducted about the recent stimulus, and I thought it might be an interesting read for you.

To respond to your assertion that the stimulus failed, I would say that the recent stimulus was more or less half-assed; the many tax cuts which were included in the stimulus have a low multiplier effect on the economy, and thus don't really make for a wise decision when considering stimulus spending.

It seems as though you are implying that we should not engage in any further stimulus spending. I would see this as a mistake, if your perception of the effectiveness of a stimulus were based upon only this more or less lame attempt to stimulate the economy.

http://www.uproxx.com/music/2011/08/...y-he-deserves/ idk why but this made me think of you

http://www.pokecommunity.com/showpos...22&postcount=1 I was referring to that

Little tip. There is actually no rule saying that you have to discuss things in private. That's just one of their made up rules.