Haha, I'm not sure at what point this turned from me ranting about why I hate children into an actual full-fledged debate, but I'm not complaining xD
The thing is, everything you're saying makes sense on the face of it, and I hope to Jeebus that it is all true because if it were, it would make me at least 50% more comfortable with the idea of children (only 50% as even your version of the whole thing is still a little more perverse than I would like). But as much as I want to believe it, I've heard too many people - not just actresses, but other people closer to me and my life - humming the same old tune to have the picture in my head wavered by an argument even as logical and persuasive as yours.
To continue the computer metaphor; I honestly do think it is more than a patch. If not a whole new operating system then at least something between the two... perhaps a behavioural software patch, two new drivers and an improved battery life with a back-up generator powered by your newfound loooove. A simple patch could not possibly be enough to create this intense and instantaneous transformation that so many people - Brooker included - have described. Perhaps it is more akin to being possessed; who you were is not 'gone' per se, but remains deep inside you, fighting tooth and nail to claw its way back to the surface but ultimately being pushed down into complacent submission by the love-induced endorphins, progesterone and other override protocols set in motion by the transformative software.
Your characterisation of the bad parents out there actually makes me more uncomfortable rather than easing my concerns. That says to me that this transformation is not just something that happens whether we like it or not (yet post-transformation
do like whether the person we were before would like it or not, as they get pushed head-first down into the depths of our memory), but something that
must happen because if it doesn't then the person in question is destined to be... *dun dun DUNNN* ... a
bad parent. So the two options that are open to you are to either succumb to the irreversible software update and change who you are as a person forever, or reach into your inner strength to fight it and keep yourself at the expense of a defenseless little creature who you are then destined to spend the next 18 years of your life crushing into a shell of what he or she could have been. This is not a comforting thought.
For some anecdotal evidence of what happens to a person when they become a parent (even if they never wanted a child), and how it changes them from an interesting person into an insufferable brain-washed drone, read
this case study written by an incredibly wise man whose keen observational skills pick up things that most fail to see. For added effect, read it while listening to
this song in the background.
In any event, my argument was never that a parent should neglect their child, but that society should stop placing them on a pedestal and making them into what should be the most important thing to everybody, whether you actually own one or not. I know far too many parents who think that everybody else should care about their child just as much as they do because of this, and that is not right. Children are not the most important thing in society. Not even close. One might argue that children are our future, but I must counter that if we spend all your time worrying about the future, when are we going to enjoy the present?
I notice that a lot of your arguments are coming from the perspective of the child and how it would affect the child... in other words, you're arguing as a parent xD. What I'm talking about is how the child affects
you, not how you affect it. And this is the problem... nobody thinks of that. From the moment a child is born, everything is about the child. The world moves to accommodate it, and it's gotten to the point where we've seen protection of children come at the expense of the freedoms of adults. Some examples of this include the lack of an R18 video game rating in my state, authorities instead preferring to ban the games that would fit into that category; the proposed SOPA and PIPA acts (as well as the current CISPA), which are designed in part to protect children from online predators yet had the potential to filter out many legitimate sites, including porn; and the Parents Television Council, made up primarily of women who are
so into their children that they aim to get any and every non-family friendly TV show cancelled just to accommodate their little cherubs.
And then finally, back on the subject of parents (I thought of something else haha), with the transformation comes a change of perspective. After the parenthood software is installed, many people who used to be pro-choice become pro-life, many who used to be pro-freedom instead begin to fight for the protection of the innocence of children above all else. We are losing soldiers in the fight for liberty. Every day we lose more. There is too much of people saying "I can't do that, I'm a
parent now".
This is starting to feel oddly like a duel between Bellatrix and Molly Weasley, and the disturbing part is I'm Bellatrix XD