Is a high-end camera needed for photography?
View Single Post
August 30th, 2012 (07:32 PM).
mmm gurl that 90s
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quote originally posted by
do you think a smart phone can replace a ps3, or PC/Mac?
View original post
No, because those three things are completely different, and are not single application tools. However, a camera application on a smart phone and a real camera are no different in concept, so those can be compared. Besides, there is a tool in common - the lens. However, the smartphone and PC have completely different makeup and intended functions. The smartphone is for portable communication, and the PC is for calculations. It's like saying, "Do you think a brick can replace a tablecloth?" So yes, a smartphone, if fast enough,
surpass a real camera.
And as processors get more powerful, more functions will appear, and likely will match or surpass real cameras in quality. A great example is the HDR function in the iPhone 4 and higher. If that is just step one, we should see more and more functions that will make taking professional pictures easier to pick up.
However, I'm not against the normal high-end cameras. If they do work better, it's fine with me. But with the rising speed of computer processors, are they going to be replaced? Anything can happen in the world of technology nowadays.
did u no there r 21 letters in the alphabet
o i forgot 5
Also Known As:
View Public Profile
Send a private message to droomph
Find all posts by droomph
Find threads started by droomph
Ignore Posts by droomph