Culture & Media DCC
View Single Post
November 20th, 2012, 02:01 AM
Back in the habit.
Join Date: Feb 2011
While I agree that a 4 or 5 hour Harry Potter finale would have been awesome, I don't mind the splitting at all. It was pretty unnecessary in the case of Breaking Dawn, and it is pretty unnecessary for The Hunger Games judging by the size of the third book in that series, but overall I like the concept of splitting a book in two and prolonging the entire thing.
I especially loved it in the case of Harry Potter, since I was not ready (and am still not ready) for it to be over.
Originally Posted by
I still laugh when I think about the people/'Diehard Rabid Raving Twilight Fanatics' who claimed/still claim that the Harry Potter franchise stole the idea of splitting the final book into two movies. I'm surprised there wasn't a holy war between the two fanbases over that decision.
Wait... there are people who think this? Even though
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2
wrapped filming in December 2010, and was released an entire four months before
Breaking Dawn Part 1
? Who are these people?
Also Known As:
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Catholic Nun
Visit Catholic Nun's homepage!
Find all posts by Catholic Nun
Find threads started by Catholic Nun