View Single Post
November 20th, 2012 (9:20 AM).
Originally Posted by
A lot of the arguments for marijuana legalisation I'm seeing here involve a "but". Stuff like agreeing that marijuana effects cognitive skill
only for a short time, that marijuana can alter brain structure
only if used excessively, an addition can form
it is only mental rather than physical. That's all well and good but it begs the question in my mind, why let any of these things happen? The fact that there are any "but"s present here show that there is indeed substance to these reasons against the use of marijuana. And if there are legitimate reasons not to use it while the only legitimate reason is medical, since I don't really consider "it gets you high" to be a legitimate reason when there are drawbacks involved, then I don't see any reason why it should be legal for recreational use.
I agree. KFC has too many buts and I don't see why it should be legal for recreational use. Let's make Kentucky Fried Chicken illegal!
Joined Nov 2012
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Lishy
Find all posts by Lishy
Find threads started by Lishy
Ignore Posts by Lishy