Do You think Lucario should be Dark type?
View Single Post
December 10th, 2012 (11:17 AM).
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote originally posted by
I actually thought that Lucario shouldn't be dark type at all, and the steel and fighting type was actually the correct type.
after reading CourageHound's post:
It makes me rethink on what I wanted to post. The point on that Lucario appears to be based on that Egyptian thingy that judges souls deceased souls really seems to make it dark. But thats just a look-alike right? So, I don't really know now. The only person that really knows is the Game Freak designers. So for now, I will just say its fighting and dark/psychic, but the colour scheme makes it looks like fighting and steel/dark.
But the naming sense, also from Bulbapedia:
Lucario may be derived from the reverse of orichalcum (a mythical metal) or oracle (referring to its supernatural abilities involving aura). It may also involve lupaster (a subspecies of the Canis aureus), Cairo, pharaoh, or lykos (Greek for wolf).
The naming sense is supposed to be a metallic type of wolf. Thats makes it steel and fighting.
However, with that aura thingy, it makes it Fighting and Psychic.
So yeah that long wall of text with sucky English and lots of grammar errors is not suitable for reading, so I will summarise.
Design wise, its Fighting and Dark. Colour wise its Fighting and Dark with a little bit of steel. Naming sense, its 100% Fighting and steel. With its special aura abilities, its Fighting and Psychic.
So, why don't they just make Lucario and Quad-type Pokemon!
View original post
I never wrapped my head around as to why Lucario is a Fighting/Steel Pokémon because it never looked like a Steel Pokémon to me. But after seeing the "orichalcum" bit in Lucario's origin I can't help but agree that its typing is fine as is.
Also Known As:
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PlatinumDude
Find all posts by PlatinumDude
Find threads started by PlatinumDude
Ignore Posts by PlatinumDude