Originals or Remakes?
View Single Post
January 18th, 2013 (1:20 AM).
Join Date: Jun 2008
Originally Posted by
It really depends on the movies. Some remakes are fantastic while others are just horrid and should not even have been attempted. Some remakes I found enjoyable were
The Posieden Adventure,
which was a remake of Posieden, and
When A Stranger Calls,
which was a 2006 remake of a film under the same name from 1976.
YOU DARE TO INCORRECTLY SAY THE NAME OF POSEIDON, LORD OF THE OCEANS?
Echoing Scarf's sentiments on
, I felt that the remake is vastly superior to the original. Vastly superior! Fantastic! The original was....terrible, to say the least. Clooney and the gang made a terrific movie and blew the original out of the water, easily.
It stands as an example as to how remakes should be done - don't mess around too much with the original premise, but change enough of it so it has a new lease of life. Then, have a cast which actually suits the premise of the film, not just floods upon floods of A listers who really don't have a feel for their character. Actually try to make the movie stand out for it's own merits, not just as a sub-par remake of a movie which should have been left alone in the first place, either for it being crap or for it being just too good to remake in modern times.
Also Known As:
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Harley Quinn
Find threads started by Harley Quinn