Texas Judge: First amendment allows people to create animal torture videos
View Single Post
April 26th, 2013 (1:06 PM).
Hug bear wants hugs
I'm still a little confused. Are they still going to be guilty of torturing and killing animals? Is the judge's decision just about the recent law and separate from charges of animal cruelty?
I think recording that kind of stuff is horrid, but I have to think that anyone recording it is probably party to the act already and should be guilty of animal cruelty and should still get some kind of penalty, especially since there's clear evidence.
And on a personal note I'm going to have nightmares based on those descriptions. I don't like to judge, or swear on this forum, but those people are sick ****s.
Joined Jun 2009
Also Known As:
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Esper
Find all posts by Esper
Find threads started by Esper
Ignore Posts by Esper