• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

[Discussion] Copyright issues

17
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Oct 13, 2013
I was just wondering if anyone thinks about the trademark and copyright issues when making a game with the Pokemon Essentials starter kit. Even if you don't plan on making money off of your game, it's still in violation. I don't see how someone can spend years making a game without worrying about receiving cease and desist letters.

It is a great system though. I'll probably end up using it to make a pokemon-like game in the future, because Nintendo and Pokemon don't like granting copyright permission to anyone. :|
 

Rayquaza.

Lead Dev in Pokémon Order and Chaos
702
Posts
12
Years
I haven't ever asked them but in short; Game Freak and Nintendo probably don't care too much if no profit is made by it because they make millions every day from selling their games to the general public of the world, it would be nearly impossible to stop people making their own fangames anyway because, like illegal downloading, it is a losing battle - people will always do it.
 
17
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Oct 13, 2013
I heard of them sending out cease and desist letters to quite a few people (not sure if those were trying to profit off of it though.) I actually just sent 2 letters (Pokemon and Nintendo) to see about getting copyright permission and made it clear that no money would be made. But on both sites it clearly states under Terms of Use that they don't give copyright permission to individuals.

I just know I would hate making a fan game that I poured my blood and sweat into over a few years only to receive a cease and desist letter. :P It's also a lot easier to go after game makers than pirates. Your comparison is right that no matter what they do, they will still do it, but there are far fewer game makers to hunt down than people that pirate software, videos, music, etc.
 
Last edited:
10,673
Posts
15
Years
  • Age 30
  • Seen Dec 30, 2023
It's essentially fanart. You don't see Nintendo/The Pokémon Company/Game Freak, going around suing every kid who does a drawing of Pikachu. They're not going to do the same with the countless games out there either.
 

DaSpirit

Mad Programmer
240
Posts
16
Years
They won't give you copyright permissions. Technically, it is illegal even if you're not making money because you don't own the copyright. Fortunately, Nintendo won't care because you're basically advertising their game for free. They could still easily shut you down if your game is too good though, even if it's free. If your game is too good, then you would make Nintendo lose money because people would play your game instead of purchasing the official ones. Either way, it's Nintendo's decisions and they could shut you down if they want. You will not get sued, most likely you'll only get a cease & desist, which should be no biggie.
 
17
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Oct 13, 2013
No biggie except the past couple years of hard work and dedication destroyed!

So, the morale of the story is, make a crappy game so they stay away altogether! hehe
 

DaSpirit

Mad Programmer
240
Posts
16
Years
Well all of that hard work is just part of a hobby, no? You do it for fun. It's not like your life gets thrown away. lol

It's a risky move to make a fan game anyway, even if the risks are around 1% (made up percentage, most likely true though).
 

Derxwna Kapsyla

Derxwna "The Badman" Kapsyla
437
Posts
12
Years
When they say "Making money off the game", what exactly does that entail? Forcing a person to buy it before they can download it? If that's the case, what about setting up a donation box for people who, if they were feeling like it, wanted to donate money to the developer to help support making the game?

Furthermore, what's the policy on having two download links - one that links to a straight up download, and another that is set to go through an Ad-hosting website, where every click generates a fraction of a penny for the person who made the link?

I figured I'd ask these questions now, because I was discussing this stuff with a friend earlier and we weren't sure what the deal was.
 

DaSpirit

Mad Programmer
240
Posts
16
Years
Eh I don't really know. I've wondered about that too.

Technically, the game is what makes people come and look at the ads, but technically you're making money off of the ads and not the game. I don't think it counts as making money, but it's still somewhat of a philosophical question. Think about it this way: non-profit organizations get money from donations but are still non-profit. It should be fine, but you should consult a lawyer.
 
17
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Oct 13, 2013
Forcing people to click a link to go through ads to download something is making money off the download. Having ads on the main page is not.

Companies have more of a reason to sue you if you make money off of their copyrighted information. Not like $50, but a few thousand. If you don't make a profit off of it, it's more likely you will get a cease and desist letter.

Either way, if you want to make money, don't use copyrighted information or get consent. If you don't care about making money, do whatever you want and have fun! :P
 

Derxwna Kapsyla

Derxwna "The Badman" Kapsyla
437
Posts
12
Years
Forcing people to click a link to go through ads to download something is making money off the download. Having ads on the main page is not.
It wouldn't be forcing them. It'd be an alternate download link which people could click if they felt like sitting through 5 seconds of an advertisement. There would still be a plain, vanilla download link for those who just wanna download it.

Companies have more of a reason to sue you if you make money off of their copyrighted information. Not like $50, but a few thousand. If you don't make a profit off of it, it's more likely you will get a cease and desist letter.
Unfortunately, companies can't stop the distribution of games once its in the hands of the user and no longer in the hands of the developer. it's not like they can systematically check every single computer to see if they have this product, then eradicate it.

Honestly, the best method is probably a donation system. That way, you aren't making money directly off the game, but the contribution of the people who felt like giving you their money as a sort of "Hey, I like this game. I think I'll give this person a dollar or so to show them I appreciate it.". It wouldn't be a forced system, and I want to say I've seen numerous fangames and hacks do this stuff, but it was mostly when they were further in development.
 
17
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Oct 13, 2013
You're right, they can't stop the distribution, thus they sue! :P

And yes, a donation system would be the best route to go when making a fan game.
 

Derxwna Kapsyla

Derxwna "The Badman" Kapsyla
437
Posts
12
Years
You're right, they can't stop the distribution, thus they sue! :P

And yes, a donation system would be the best route to go when making a fan game.

At that point, if the game has been finished and distributed, there's not much they can do. They can order you to take it down so additional people can no longer download it, but by that point, it really just becomes the same issue as torrenting. They can't really sue after that. You no longer have control over it, and they didn't take action early enough to prevent it from spreading as much as it did.

Once it's out of the developers hands, there's not much they can do to control who gets it, and what the individual does with it afterwards.
 
17
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Oct 13, 2013
Distribution has nothing to do with it. It's the fact that you used copyrighted and trademarked information without consent. That's all it takes to sue someone. That's why companies trademark, register, copyright everything. So they don't have to watch the world to see if someone is stealing/using their stuff, but when they catch someone, they can take whatever action they want to, including suing.

Got this in an e-mail from Nintendo.
Although we are unable to grant permission, use of Nintendo properties without our formal permission may still be allowed depending on the circumstances. You are encouraged to seek your own legal counsel if you have any questions about whether your particular proposed use is permitted without Nintendo's authorization. This is not a comment on whether we believe your particular proposed use is permissible—Nintendo cannot provide legal advice.

Sounds like permission to me! ;D
 
Last edited:

DaSpirit

Mad Programmer
240
Posts
16
Years
Not true. You can only use copyrighted material if it qualifies under "fair-use". The only way it qualifies under that is if you posted copyrighted permission for the sake of criticism (like reviews) or education purposes (like a school project).
 
9
Posts
11
Years
  • Seen Mar 1, 2013
Yeah I don't think it would be a problem unless you claimed it as your own, or profited.
 

Mugendai

Glitchologist
11
Posts
13
Years
  • Seen Apr 17, 2014
If we were talking about how to decrease the chances of C&D or legal action from Nintendo, then I'd say one of the important things to do is avoid trademark infringement. Nintendo is required by law to protect their trademark, either by sending a C&D or demanding royalties, otherwise they will lose that trademark. A while ago, I read a thread where the OP said they had sent an e-mail to Nintendo asking about fangames, and Nintendo said they would allow fangames as long as they didn't infringe on their trademark.

As a start, that means you shouldn't use the blue-and-yellow Pokemon logo you see on every official non-Asian media; either make a new logo in a different font or don't include the word "Pokémon" in your fanwork's name at all.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top