Signature Rules & Regulations [Updated 12/05/13]

[Pinkie-Dawn]

Do you think my signature safe to go, or am I too fresh to use one yet?

[AlexOzzyCake]

Originally Posted by Pinkie-Dawn

Do you think my signature safe to go, or am I too fresh to use one yet?

You signature is indeed good to go c:

[ahmet476]

Hmm, my sig didn't have a scroll box. I made sure of it. Why did it get banned?

[AlexOzzyCake]

Originally Posted by ahmet476

Hmm, my sig didn't have a scroll box. I made sure of it. Why did it get banned?

The dimensions of this picture:

Spoiler:

are width: 700px, height: 200px. The maximum width allowed for images in signatures is 600px, so the image was too wide by 100px and will have to be cropped before replacing it :)

[ahmet476]

Oh, I see. Thanks for the info. I'll fix it. Probably tomorrow. You see I requested it from a friend and I gave him the sig limits of this forum. I guess he didn't read them and I thought he did and didn't check the size myself.

I think image is done. Trying to fix the text a bit.

--------------

I think it's ok now.

[Derozio]

Oi, is mine alright? Hope it is. ;p

[Mew~]

I did this from my phone, 's yeah.

[bobandbill]

All those signatures are fine. (Latter two sure are just within boundaries though!)

[jellicentfan1]

Is mine Ok? I havent changed it in a while and this is my first animated sig and was just checking.

[Cirno]

Originally Posted by jellicentfan1

Is mine Ok? I havent changed it in a while and this is my first animated sig and was just checking.

It's not too wide, not too tall, and definitely not over the size limit since it's only 86KB. So you should be good to go. ^^

[Cid]

Can anyone see if I screwed up my CSS or not?

I sure hope not, it's been a while since I used CSS in my signature. ;;

[Forever]

Originally Posted by Cid

Can anyone see if I screwed up my CSS or not?

I sure hope not, it's been a while since I used CSS in my signature. ;;

It's totally fine, plus looks nice!!

[~RNC~]

Hello, I was in here and asked about my signature and was told it was fine, I can find the post but I have not changed the size at all I only added a blastoise in the middle, now I ask why has it been disabled?

EDIT: Found it,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~RNC~ View Post
Changed my signature again so coming in to ask if it's ok, so if need be I can fix it before it gets disabled if not!
Thanks
Yup, your signature is A-Okay c: (it's fine!)

[Razor Leaf]

Looks like the image + text exceeds the 350px limit. As for why you were told it was alright before... I'm unsure. Did you have the same amount of text that time?

[~RNC~]

Yes, like I said it was all the same, I only added the blastoise to it and that post I found was from page 18if some one could ask who told me it was alright and it just got disabled when it wasn't?

[Razor Leaf]

It looks like the person who originally checked your signature was simply wrong, in that case. I know that on some styles, the 350px scrollbar doesn't show up which can lead to incorrect signature estimates. Honest mistake, I guess. Unfortunately, having just checked it myself, your signature is slightly over the limit so the text needs to go or the image should be made smaller or something like that.

So yeah, bottom line, mistake on our part but no harm done in the end since no infractions or anything were given. Just make the sig a bit smaller and you're all good. :]

[~RNC~]

Can you tell me how I can I click on my sig it comes up as 600 x 300 which makes it below the sig rules, I know those few little clickables above do not take it over 50?

[Razor Leaf]

The simple answer is that the clickables do take it over the 350px limit. Only by a few pixels, but indeed, over. I imagine making the font a little bit smaller would fix it up, or removing one of the lines. You can also shrink the image but... yeah. The extra couple of clickables make up more than 50px.

[~RNC~]

I would rather shrink the image than remove the links, can you tell me about how much it's over the limit please?

[Jellicent♀]

Originally Posted by ~RNC~

I would rather shrink the image than remove the links, can you tell me about how much it's over the limit please?

You'd have to shrink the image about 50-60 pixels. The image itself is perfectly within the rules, yes. It is the addition of the larger text that really takes it out of proportion, which has been said.

Razor Leaf said that it's about 50 pixels over the limit, so if I were you, I'd take the image about 50 pixels shorter.

You don't have to remove the links, you could just make the font size about a size or two smaller, or remove one of the spaces in between the lines of text you have.

[~RNC~]

Ok how about now?
fillerzzz

[gunnerpow7]

Checking if my sig is good to go... :3

[Abnegation]

It's good to go buddy, both of you!

[P-Sign]

Is my signature fine?
Decided to give CSS tags a try :p

[jdthebud]

I'm wondering how the CSS works with the sig rules. I wanted to put a limit in the CSS so if I added too many lines of text it would cut of the bottom a little. So I set a height limit of 348 px with top padding of 2 px. But it was disabled even though all the code is within the CSS brackets.

And when I check it in Paint, it is 350 pixels. Did I miss something?