The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Current Generation Pokémon Gaming > Pokémon X & Pokémon Y
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices

Pokémon X & Pokémon Y The Kalos region awaits! Explore a new world, capture new Pokémon, and fight off Team Flare in the newest installment of the core Pokémon series.
X/Y Quick Q&A | X/Y Friend Code Sharing Thread


Advertise here

Reply
Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.  
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old January 8th, 2013, 08:40 PM
dontstay96's Avatar
dontstay96
Grass-man
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pasalacqua
Gender: Male
Nature: Modest

Advertise here
Well there has been a lot of speculations of a lot of things... so... why not triple types?? do you think it might be possible?? if Game Freak does it well it could be really cool!!!!
__________________
3DS FC: 0533-5538-0146
IGN: Charles
Poison Safari: Gloom, Garbodor and Drapion (At least the Drapion is cool!)
Champion of the Single Grass Monotype Challenge on Pokémon Sapphire
Champion of the Nuzlocke Challenge on Pokémon Platinum
"No man can eat 50 eggs" - Tré Cool
I battle competitively with my favorite Pokémon, not with the most used or the ones with the better stats, copy this in your sig if you do it too.
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old January 8th, 2013, 08:45 PM
Sydian's Avatar
Sydian
Reserved for Syd's house - Nook Homes
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alabama
Age: 22
Gender: Female
Nature: Timid
I don't think it'd happen this gen. There was a thread for this in PGC a while back, and there were some damn good reasons as to why this would be a hot mess to implement, so yeah. I think it'd make things unnecessarily confusing and complicated. Some people still get confused with dual types, so triple types eeeeh.
__________________
Super Smash Staff Collab
Mother of Challenges
Klippy's Best Friend
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old January 8th, 2013, 08:55 PM
MantisboyN
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Gender:
Nature: Sassy
They would have to revamp many Pokemon from older generations and figure out weakness charts and all sorts of glorious fun stuff. It'd be a cool idea, but I think it might make things waay too complicated.
__________________
I'm really not excited about this...
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:09 PM
Cerberus87's Avatar
Cerberus87
Mega Houndoom, baby!
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Brazil
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Nature: Lonely
Not likely, although it's possible because of the way type matchups work.

However, a type change of old Pokémon would be necessary to balance things out, and the only Pokémon that ever changed type in the history of the franchise was Magnemite, and that was in 2nd gen when the Steel type was introduced.
__________________

3DS FC: 3282-2423-7870 (PM if you add) (Bug-type Safari)

I like Lyra so take my opinions with a grain of salt.
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:13 PM
Deceit's Avatar
Deceit
Toxic.
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Pastoria Great Marsh
Gender: Male
Nature: Timid
Well, it is kind of cool, but it could lead to many cheap typings. And like others have said, this changes the previous 5 generations before it, as however many pokemon in gen 6 have an advantage with an extra type.

The only way I really see it possible, is by having a move that adds a certain type to a Pokemon, like maybe dark, but still. :/
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:14 PM
Zorua's Avatar
Zorua
Adventurous One.
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Nature: Gentle
please no.

Competitive is going to be more of a pain in the butt if triple typing were to ever exist. A nice idea in paper, but it would just be a hot mess, like Sydian said. XD
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:28 PM
curiousnathan's Avatar
curiousnathan
woop woop
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Nature: Careful
PERHAPS, something like Hidden Types could be implemented. Similarly to Hidden Abilities, on rare occasions Pokemon can be caught with their 'Hidden Type'. These Pokemon could be only found in shaking patches of grass, water spots, Hidden Grottoes etc. However, such Pokemon wouldn't be triple typed, but rather dual-typed with their Hidden Type replacing their usual Secondary Type.

Just a thought!
__________________
wooper is love,
wooper is life.
moderator | lovely pair | PC live
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:32 PM
Hiroshi Sotomura's Avatar
Hiroshi Sotomura
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Nature: Lax
We've got one, we've got two… and then we have game breaking changes. If they went back and changed the types, the balances could get pretty interesting. But then try explaining weaknesses to somebody. It could even result in a 1/8x or 8x damage multiplier, and an imbalance with those.

I think more abilities that give the "no effect" benefit of some types would be a more balanced solution.
__________________
Hiroshi Sotomura

That's Our Switch.
Pre-Service Teacher. Tech Guy. Web Designer. PokéCommunity Administrator. Wanderer. Novice Hockey Player. rijonAdventures Developer. #westjournal. Views are my own.
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:44 PM
Deokishisu's Avatar
Deokishisu
Mr. Magius
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: If I'm online, it's a safe bet I'm at a computer.
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
My goodness, please Arceus no!

That sort of thing would really break the game. I mean, how many extra combinations REALLY add more depth? I think that the most weaknesses a type combo has is eight, the least is one. The most resistances is Bronzong, if I'm not mistaken, which I think is a whopping 12. Adding a third type may as well make types irrelevant. You'll end up with combinations that either cripple a Pokemon, banishing it to the neverused category permanently, or make absolutely no difference at all.

Not to mention, a Pokemon with THREE different STAB boosted moves? *shudder*
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old January 8th, 2013, 09:49 PM
bobandbill's Avatar
bobandbill
Where's that sheep...
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Coast - Australia
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
Send a message via AIM to bobandbill Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to bobandbill
I don't see it happening. It'd confuse the system beyond belief very easily. (And then why wouldn't previous gen Pokemon not become triple type themselves? If they did, it'd break the established canon of that Pokemon being so-and-so (fine in 2nd gen, less so as a sudden addition in 6th gen). If they didn't, either most of the 6th gen Pokemon are triple or hardly any are, making it seem an out-of-place gimmick). Plus Pokemon has always been primarily aimed at kids. Why muddle the system and make it harder to grasp for the target audience? 'Water beats Fire, Flying beats Grass, and Ghost against a Dark/Psychic/Ghost type is... uh...'

Plus, the type system is fine as it is. Allowing triple types could throw that out of whack, so there's risk with something that possibly won't offer much. As said above abilities can offer possibilities too without such problems.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old January 8th, 2013, 10:03 PM
Forever's Avatar
Forever
let it go
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: http://goo.my/server
Age: 22
Gender: Female
Very bad for competitive players. It would ruin everything we've ever known. XD; I mean, could be awesome but it'd just destroy what competitive has. Better off if it never happens (or at least not this generation).
__________________
I'm paired with and in love with Frizy ♥
Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old January 8th, 2013, 10:17 PM
Keiran's Avatar
Keiran
Moshtradamus
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Jersey
Gender: Male
Nature: Careful
It's certainly possible, but it would render any Pokemon with a x8 weakness quite useless. Especially those weak to Rock. Stealth Rock would OHKO anything x8 weak to Rock. :/

If they want to make Pokemon of similar types more diverse, I think a better route would be a secondary ability type focused on damage reduction or pseudo-STAB based on the Pokemons design like the PokePowers/Body from the TCG. For example, an Ice-type could have ice thick/strong enough to remove its Rock/Fighting weakness.

But, to be honest, I'd be perfectly happy with no changes to typing.
__________________
Mod of Trade Corner| Pair | Trainer Information

又 yltfos os kaeps and low 又
Wandering Allowed, Wondering Aloud
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old January 8th, 2013, 10:18 PM
Ω Ruby and α Sapphire's Avatar
Ω Ruby and α Sapphire
Ω & α... Join the Bandwagon!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria, Australia
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Send a message via Skype™ to Ω Ruby and α Sapphire
Yeah, it would just take too long and be too big of a change. They'd have to go back and edit other Pokemon and it would make it soooooo annoying for competitive battling. Good idea on paper, not in reality.
__________________
Previously
Zupplu
Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old January 8th, 2013, 10:28 PM
vaporeon7's Avatar
vaporeon7
My life would suck without you
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Preparing for trouble and making it double.
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via Skype™ to vaporeon7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forever View Post
Very bad for competitive players. It would ruin everything we've ever known. XD; I mean, could be awesome but it'd just destroy what competitive has. Better off if it never happens (or at least not this generation).
I agree with Nica. I don't want to have to start my Pokémon knowledge all over again. It'll be like being Ash's Pikachu entering a new region and getting weak.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15    
Old January 8th, 2013, 10:35 PM
Rivvon's Avatar
Rivvon
Unburden Belly Drum
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Age: 21
Gender: Female
Nature: Jolly
I don't think this will ever happen unless the effectiveness system is completely revamped. There is no way triple types would work in the currently utilized system. It's already bad enough having to remember what Pokemon has what ability, general movepools, general base stats, and 1 to 2 types...add a third type to that, and watch the math go from easy x0, x.25, x.5, x1, x2, and x4, to numbers that I can't even think of right now. That's how bad it would get.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16    
Old January 8th, 2013, 10:49 PM
Patchisou Yutohru's Avatar
Patchisou Yutohru
...
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Condale
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Lax
I think anything is possible, but I don't think that they'll do it. I also don't think it really makes much sense. The battling system is pretty solid, and introducing a Pokémon with three types just makes it much, much, much more complicated. How would that even work?
Reply With Quote
  #17    
Old January 9th, 2013, 03:42 AM
Hoenn's Avatar
Hoenn
» Mind games
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hoenn ☆
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Send a message via Skype™ to Hoenn
No, I don't think this will happen nor do I want it to.
__________________

Asylum
Reply With Quote
  #18    
Old January 9th, 2013, 03:51 AM
BLOOOD-La-ti-'s Avatar
BLOOOD-La-ti-
This is the place to try!
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Earth,use common sense.
Age: 13
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
No absolutely not.
Never happening bro.
__________________

oh check this out:
http://www.pokecommunity.com/member.php?u=373174
My new account. :3
Reply With Quote
  #19    
Old January 9th, 2013, 04:18 AM
Mr155555's Avatar
Mr155555
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
No i think that will break the balance of pokemon if they introduced a pokemon with triple type
__________________
Feraligatr and Krookodile Best Pokemon Ever
my pokemon omega ruby team
swampert-ludicolo-altaria-hariyama-torkoal-froslass
Reply With Quote
  #20    
Old January 9th, 2013, 09:40 AM
Arlo's Avatar
Arlo
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
There are 17 types. That means there are 136 unique combinations of those 17 types. That's already complicated, and already confuses people, and already skews things with 1/4 and 4x weaknesses. If you increased it to three possible types, that would create 680 different unique combinations, with resistances and weaknesses ranging all the way up to 1/8 and 8x. That's simply far too complicated and far too broad of a range. I don't think there's any way that GF will ever do it.
Reply With Quote
  #21    
Old January 9th, 2013, 09:43 AM
Iceman3317's Avatar
Iceman3317
Kalos Explorer!
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mistralton City
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
No, please no.... it would be 1 massive pain.
__________________
Friend Code - 2251 4942 3229
Friend Safari Pokemon - Abra, Espurr, and Duosion
Pm me with your FC so I can add you if you add me.
Reply With Quote
  #22    
Old January 9th, 2013, 09:49 AM
Lockmaster24's Avatar
Lockmaster24
Wise words of FizzyStardust
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Imagine a Fire/Ice/Flying type that dies instantly when switched into Stealth Rocks... Seems a little flawed to me, x8 weakness, no thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curious. View Post
PERHAPS, something like Hidden Types could be implemented. Similarly to Hidden Abilities, on rare occasions Pokemon can be caught with their 'Hidden Type'. These Pokemon could be only found in shaking patches of grass, water spots, Hidden Grottoes etc. However, such Pokemon wouldn't be triple typed, but rather dual-typed with their Hidden Type replacing their usual Secondary Type.

Just a thought!
Interesting idea, but wouldn't it suck when you try to toxic something and it's randomly immune.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #23    
Old January 9th, 2013, 10:03 AM
Snivysmiley's Avatar
Snivysmiley
Ruby/Sapphire Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Nature: Modest
Imagine the pain of fighting a water/fire/grass pokemon....
__________________
MY POKEMON BLOG
I'll trade or battle with anyone!
Reply With Quote
  #24    
Old January 9th, 2013, 10:03 AM
skyluigi2's Avatar
skyluigi2
L-let's-a go...!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 18
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
Send a message via Skype™ to skyluigi2
No, this is a terrible thing.
Double types are just fine; it's easy to work out type advantages/disadvantages.
With triple types, it'd just get a whole lot more confusing. Don't expect this.
__________________


☆ 3DS FC: 5069-3912-3062
☆ Let me know if you've added me!

☆ Next most anticipated game(s): Super Smash Bros. for 3DS, Bayonetta 2, Fantasy Life, Hyrule Warriors and Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire

☆ Currently playing: Pokémon Platinum and Animal Crossing: New Leaf

☆ I'm known on Twitter as skyluigi2 as well



skyluigi2
Reply With Quote
  #25    
Old January 9th, 2013, 11:11 AM
funguy10
Togepi
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
What about dual type moves, like Blaze Kick being fire/fighting?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links


Advertise here
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.