Community

The PokéCommunity

We are still working on a better slogan!

Visit Index



Advertise here

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Off-Topic Discussions > Discussions & Debates
Notices

Discussions & Debates The place to go for slightly more in-depth topics. Discussions and debates about the world, current events, ideas, news, and more.

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old April 7th, 2013, 07:15 AM
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X
For Money
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet

Advertise here
Quote:
On one covert video, farm workers illegally burn the ankles of Tennessee walking horses with chemicals. Another captures workers in Wyoming punching and kicking pigs and flinging piglets into the air. And at one of the country's largest egg suppliers, a video shows hens caged alongside rotting bird corpses, while workers burn and snap off the beaks of young chicks.

Each video – all shot by undercover animal rights activists – drew a swift response: Federal prosecutors in Tennessee charged the horse trainer and other workers, who have pleaded guilty, with violating the Horse Protection Act. Authorities in Wyoming charged nine farm employees with cruelty to animals. And the egg supplier, which operates in Iowa and other states, lost one of its biggest customers, McDonald's.

But a dozen or so state legislatures have had a different reaction: They proposed or enacted bills that would make it illegal to covertly videotape livestock farms, or apply for a job at one without disclosing ties to animal rights groups. They have also drafted measures that would require such videos to be given to the authorities almost immediately, which activists say would thwart any meaningful investigation of large factory farms.

Critics call them "Ag-Gag" bills.

Some of the legislation appears inspired by the American Legislative Exchange Council, a business advocacy group that in the past has drafted bills adopted by lawmakers for such things as "stand your ground" gun laws and tighter voter identification rules.

One of the group's model bills, "The Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act," bars filming or taking pictures on livestock farms to "defame the facility or its owner." Violators would be placed on a "terrorist registry." Officials of the group did not respond to a request for comment.

Activists say they have not seen legislation that would require them to register as terrorists, but they say other measures – including laws passed last year in Iowa, Utah and Missouri – make it nearly impossible to produce similar undercover exposés."It definitely has had a chilling effect on our ability to conduct undercover investigations," said Vandhana Bala, general counsel for Mercy for Animals, which has shot many videos, including the egg-farm investigation in 2011.

The American Farm Bureau Federation, which lobbies for the agricultural and meat industries, criticized the mistreatment seen on some videos. But it cautions that some methods represent best practices endorsed by animal-care experts.

Livestock companies say that their businesses have suffered financially from unfair videos that are less about protecting animals than persuading consumers to stop eating meat. Don Lehe, a Republican state representative in Indiana, said videos can cast farmers in a false light and give them little opportunity to correct the record.

As for whistle-blowers, advocates for the meat industry say that they are protected from prosecution by provisions in some bills that give them 24 to 48 hours to turn over videos to legal authorities. Animal rights groups counter that investigations take months to complete.

"Instead of working to prevent future abuses, the factory farms want to silence them," said Matt Dominguez, who works on farm animal protection at the Humane Society of the United States. "What they really want is for the whistle to be blown on the whistle-blower." WHERE IT'S HAPPENING

• Indiana and Tennessee are expected to vote soon on measures similar to those passed last year in Iowa, Utah and Missouri; Nebraska and Pennsylvania are debating them.

• Animal-rights supporters successfully quashed a handful of bills, including those in New York, New Mexico, New Hampshire and Wyoming.

• California is considering a similar measure with AB343, introduced last month by Jim Patterson, R-Fresno, and sponsored by the California Cattlemen's Association.
http://www.sacbee.com/2013/04/07/532...#storylink=cpy

Classic measures - Lets, instead of stopping animal abuse, make it harder for people to stop animal abusers.
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape
  #2    
Old April 7th, 2013, 10:38 AM
Esper's Avatar
Esper
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Oh, the American Legislative Exchange Council is involved in this, eh? Not surprising. They're one of the worst groups out there in terms of undue influence in politics. Expect anything they have their hands in to be very pro-corporate profit at the expense of everything else, particularly the democratic process.

deviantart blog pair
  #3    
Old April 7th, 2013, 10:47 AM
TRIFORCE89's Avatar
TRIFORCE89
Guide of Darkness
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Temple of Light
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
This seems unnecessary.

"They proposed or enacted bills that would make it illegal to covertly videotape livestock farms, or apply for a job at one without disclosing ties to animal rights groups. They have also drafted measures that would require such videos to be given to the authorities almost immediately, which activists say would thwart any meaningful investigation of large factory farms."

If the problem is covertly videotaping livestock farms, then wouldn't trespass already be an adequate charge?

And then the rest of that quote is just laughable
  #4    
Old April 7th, 2013, 11:57 AM
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X
For Money
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Them currently covertly taping the farms wouldn't count as trespass - They only way they could get in to do so is if they were hired. And hiring them means that they, legally, would be allowed to enter that area.
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape
Post Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links


Advertise here
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 01:51 AM.

About Us
© 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com. Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.

Copyright
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com. PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator. Header artwork by Jordanice of deviantART.

Social Media
If you would like to stay up-to-date with us on the go, when we're down, or other such things, follow us on social media sites--most notibly Twitter, Facebook, and Google Plus--by clicking on the links provided.

Design presented by Peitharchia. Special thanks to Hiroshi Sotomura and Ausaudriel.