The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Off-Topic Discussions > The Round Table
Reload this Page Voting Rights Act dealt major blow by the Supreme Court!
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Daily Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read


The Round Table Have a seat at the Round Table for in-depth discussions, extended or serious conversations, and current events. From world news to talks on life, growing up, relationships, and issues in society, this is the place to be. Come be a knight.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old June 25th, 2013 (6:25 AM).
FreakyLocz14's Avatar
FreakyLocz14 FreakyLocz14 is offline
Conservative Patriot
Platinum Tier
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
Posts: 3,481
The Supreme Court has just ruled that Section 4 of the Voting Act is unconstitutional!

Here's the opinion:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-96_6k47.pdf
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old June 25th, 2013 (7:13 AM).
KingCharizard's Avatar
KingCharizard KingCharizard is offline
C++ Developer Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Nature: Bold
Posts: 1,250
So what exactly does it mean? I dont feel like reading that whole bill. I know it has something to do with discrimination..
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old June 25th, 2013 (8:33 AM).
Ivysaur's Avatar
Ivysaur Ivysaur is online now
You found a heart!
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Madrid
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,416
Send a message via Skype™ to Ivysaur
Well it means that today all States marked for past racist practices are allowed to change their voting legislation and make it harder for non-white minorities to vote without needing preclearance from the Department of Justice, and any changes that in fact made it harder for those people to vote (like changing their polling places every week or forcing them to pass exams before being allowed to register) would stay in place until a court ruled otherwise, if any even does. That's how it used to be before Section 4 (last passed almost unanimously in 2003 I think- only three representatives voted against it if memory serves).
__________________
Oh, we've made a mistake
We've lost our minds
We've lost our memory
Oh, what's it gonna take?
There's always something else
So occupy yourself



Yes kids, once upon a time I was an admin
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old June 25th, 2013 (9:59 AM).
KingCharizard's Avatar
KingCharizard KingCharizard is offline
C++ Developer Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Nature: Bold
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Went View Post
Well it means that today all States marked for past racist practices are allowed to change their voting legislation and make it harder for non-white minorities to vote without needing preclearance from the Department of Justice, and any changes that in fact made it harder for those people to vote (like changing their polling places every week or forcing them to pass exams before being allowed to register) would stay in place until a court ruled otherwise, if any even does. That's how it used to be before Section 4 (last passed almost unanimously in 2003 I think- only three representatives voted against it if memory serves).
So how much will this affect voting, i think most places allow anyone with the proper credentials to vote... as far as i know if you have your id and your registration card you can vote.

I've never seen discrimination take place at a polling station personally and i worked at a few
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old June 25th, 2013 (10:09 AM).
Powerserge's Avatar
Powerserge Powerserge is offline
The Imminent Victor
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Florida
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Posts: 402
Well, many liberals even believed that the act was a bit dated, but just as Went said, this does open the door for many conservative states to use underhanded methods to prevent minorities, who typically vote democrat, from being able to vote at all. We will see if these states try anything...I won't be surprised if they do, since they were doing this past presidential election with the sudden moving of districts in the New England states, even when Section 4 was in place. I don't think the US has moved beyond racism and discrimination enough to facilitate this. But hey, SCOTUS is essentially a bunch of evil old conservatives constantly underestimating or even overestimating current social consciousness and ideals.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old June 25th, 2013 (11:28 AM).
ANARCHit3cht's Avatar
ANARCHit3cht ANARCHit3cht is offline
Call me Archie!
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,114
While this might not be a morally sound thing, I do agree with the Supreme Court's ruling. As what are supposed to be independent states, we should be governing ourselves. The Federal Government is merely meant to be the string that binds us all together. As history has proven, even with the minority votes bogged down, progress is still made in the proper direction--perhaps all the more so in the face of such adverse conditions.

@KingCharizard: As mentioned a little earlier, there is plenty they can do to make it difficult for minorities to vote. At times, it has been property or wealth requirements, at others, literacy or other tests. They will look for anything that they can prey upon and move in to capitalize on that opportunity to block the unwanted votes. Often times, this will even block the votes from the white people they want who just so happen to fall into the same category. To remedy this, they brought in things such as the Grandfather clause, which allowed many illiterate whites to vote, if their Grandpa had. Now, I know that in a modern age they can't be so blatant about their tactics, but you can bet your ass they'll be trying everything they can like this.
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old June 25th, 2013 (12:06 PM).
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X Mr. X is offline
For Money
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 2,371
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/best-lines-ginsburg-dissent-voting-rights-act-decision#13721904971141&action=collapse_widget&id=8340726

Lists cases of states attempting to disenfranchise black voters.

All of these cases happened when the VRA law - Now that part of it is struck down, we will be seeing many more attempts like this. A lot of them being sucuessful.
__________________
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old June 25th, 2013 (1:18 PM).
Ivysaur's Avatar
Ivysaur Ivysaur is online now
You found a heart!
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Madrid
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,416
Send a message via Skype™ to Ivysaur
Well, one hour after the ruling, the Texas Attorney General gladly announced that they were going to enforce the ID law and the redistricting that had been blocked by the Justice dept. Awesome!

This said, it's been section 4, no section 5 that has been stricken down. In other words, preclearance is still okay, but the map of States that required it no longer is- so it's up to Congress to redraw it. Sadly we aren't talking about the 2006 (no 2003, my error) Congress that voted in favour of the VRA by 98-0 in the Senate and 390-33 in the House. We are talking about the Congress that can't pass a Farm Bill supported by the Majority.

I'm sorry for all the minority voters in those States.
__________________
Oh, we've made a mistake
We've lost our minds
We've lost our memory
Oh, what's it gonna take?
There's always something else
So occupy yourself



Yes kids, once upon a time I was an admin
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old June 25th, 2013 (1:43 PM).
donavannj's Avatar
donavannj donavannj is offline
ModeratorCSEO
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 19,129
With any luck, Congress will wise up and just make it apply to every state if they wish to keep this in effect. Though that would be quite expensive to administrate, so I don't see Congress redrawing the map to encompass every state, if they even do at all at this point.
__________________
Avatar is Jun from one of the K-On! manga. Check back later for signature.
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old June 25th, 2013 (1:59 PM).
Kanzler's Avatar
Kanzler Kanzler is offline
naughty biscotti
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Posts: 5,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANARCHit3cht View Post
While this might not be a morally sound thing, I do agree with the Supreme Court's ruling. As what are supposed to be independent states, we should be governing ourselves. The Federal Government is merely meant to be the string that binds us all together. As history has proven, even with the minority votes bogged down, progress is still made in the proper direction--perhaps all the more so in the face of such adverse conditions.
I'm not too good with American politics, but I can say here that that's just one opinion. There are many opinions about what the federal government and the nature of the states should be. I don't know if the US would be the same if the states were treated as supposedly independent states. For one, Texas, New York, and California would probably the only states with any international relevance <-- okay that's kinda off topic, but what I'm trying to say is that the federal government, to me, is what gives the US its greatness today. I'm not taking this too seriously, just pointing out that there are many, prominent, and to me valid visions of the United States of America (all subject to their own justification, but you know what I mean).

I don't know how wise it would be to "allow the states decide" election policy that can affect national elections. That just doesn't sound right. I read Mr. X's article and a lot of the problems seem to have to do with gerrymandering. I dunno about the US, but in Canada elections are handed to a non-partisan government agency and as a result gerrymandering isn't really a problem. Nobody is going to redistrict a province/territory whenever they get into power because the existing districts are "unfair". You also don't have ridiculous acts of inaccessible ballot stations either. Elections Canada runs the entirety of federal elections and it only make sense that federal elections have one standard.

Besides, isn't the reason the federal government is intervening in this case is protecting the individual right to vote? I thought protection of the individual was the highest virtue an American could hope for. So why should states be given more power when that level of government has historically and continually demonstrated that it would allow for such discrimination against the individual? The irony is that some of the founders favoured a decentralized government to prevent an over-reaching federal government's tyranny over the individual, but the fed has to step in because the it's the state level that's causing the tyranny, not the federal government. While I can see why a weak central government can be appealing, I don't know why it would be appealing in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old June 25th, 2013 (6:43 PM).
FreakyLocz14's Avatar
FreakyLocz14 FreakyLocz14 is offline
Conservative Patriot
Platinum Tier
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingCharizard View Post
So what exactly does it mean? I dont feel like reading that whole bill. I know it has something to do with discrimination..
As Went said before, the Court upheld the preclearance requirement (Section 5), but they ruled that using decades-old data to determine which jurisdictions require preclearance is unconstitutional. Congress with have to determine the jurisdictions based on current data.
Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old June 25th, 2013 (8:06 PM).
OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire's Avatar
OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire is offline
10000 year Emperor of Hoenn
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oregon
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Careful
Posts: 17,056
It makes sense to use new data, as some of the places with voter discrimination might've shifted to some places beyond the old data. However what worries me is that congress is left in charge...it's too divided...in someways almost as divided as pre civil war... (which interesing tid bit after the South left, the North, lead by the still young Republican party used the absense of the southern Democrats to pass several laws they previously couldn't due to said divide...).
__________________
# TeamRowlet
I'm currently working on some novels. If you're interested you can read them here:
https://www.wattpad.com/user/ImperialSun
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old June 26th, 2013 (1:50 AM).
Netto Azure's Avatar
Netto Azure Netto Azure is offline
The Ashen Knight
ModeratorCS
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Thors Academy, Erebonian Empire
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Brave
Posts: 9,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by donavannj View Post
With any luck, Congress will wise up and just make it apply to every state if they wish to keep this in effect. Though that would be quite expensive to administrate, so I don't see Congress redrawing the map to encompass every state, if they even do at all at this point.
Sadly with Congress being divided and hyper-partisan it is highly unlikely a new law based on recent studies on race relations in the United States will pass to address the history of voter suppression in various states and counties.

Even recent studies have shown (which was used when the Voting Rights Act was unanimously reauthorized in 2006) that most voting discrimination still occurs in the areas (from the data used) covered under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old June 26th, 2013 (3:04 PM).
CarcharOdin's Avatar
CarcharOdin CarcharOdin is offline
Go away
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Go away
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
Posts: 3,609
Send a message via Skype™ to CarcharOdin
From what I understand, the decision yesterday is a double edged sword. On one hand, it makes sense that we need to start looking at current data for deciding which states need permission to change voting legislation instead of data more than thirty years old. Unfortunately, on the other hand, we need to get current data and have Congress draw up a new map fast otherwise states that are going to change legislation based on race are going to be free to do so without restriction and I think some already have (looking at you...TEXAS)
__________________
Go away
Reply With Quote
  #15    
Old June 29th, 2013 (8:19 PM).
TRIFORCE89's Avatar
TRIFORCE89 TRIFORCE89 is offline
Guide of Darkness
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Temple of Light
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 8,120
Is the Voter ID business a big deal?

We do it here in Canada. You need one of three ways to identify yourself:
1) Government-issued photo ID (driver's license, health card, passport, etc.)
2) Two pieces of paper that have your name and address on them (a letter, a bill, a cheque, etc.)
3) Have someone vouch for you

It's not difficult. But you voting system is just screwy to begin with. You should not have long lines. Somebody is doing something wrong

Anyway, like BlahISuck, I find it really weird that's states would decide the parameters for a federal election. State/municipal elections, okay. But not Federal.

The preclearance still exists, which is good. And I'm find with updating (I think they just did it in 2006 or so, no?) as that's always good. Don't have much faith in the current Congress to do that successfully though. But that's the note the role of the SCOTUS though I guess. Not to focus on the now, but the forever.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16    
Old June 30th, 2013 (7:09 AM).
Dakotah's Avatar
Dakotah Dakotah is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRIFORCE89 View Post
Is the Voter ID business a big deal?

We do it here in Canada. You need one of three ways to identify yourself:
1) Government-issued photo ID (driver's license, health card, passport, etc.)
2) Two pieces of paper that have your name and address on them (a letter, a bill, a cheque, etc.)
3) Have someone vouch for you

It's not difficult. But you voting system is just screwy to begin with. You should not have long lines. Somebody is doing something wrong

Anyway, like BlahISuck, I find it really weird that's states would decide the parameters for a federal election. State/municipal elections, okay. But not Federal.

The preclearance still exists, which is good. And I'm find with updating (I think they just did it in 2006 or so, no?) as that's always good. Don't have much faith in the current Congress to do that successfully though. But that's the note the role of the SCOTUS though I guess. Not to focus on the now, but the forever.
You forgot the fourth avenue of identifying yourself, through a sworn oath before an official.
__________________
DAKOTAH
Personal Website
YouTube Channel


1693-4093-6753
Normal Safari
Lillipup / Audino / Ditto


"...many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Obi Wan Kenobi
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:18 PM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2016.