The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Off-Topic Discussions > Discussions & Debates
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices

Discussions & Debates The place to go for slightly more in-depth topics. Discussions and debates about the world, current events, ideas, news, and more.

Reply
Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.  
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old July 20th, 2013, 09:17 PM
Livewire's Avatar
Livewire
League Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Victory Road
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via Skype™ to Livewire
Ask and you shall receive, Patchisou Yutohru

Simply put, do you think that religious institutions should be forced to cover the costs for contraceptives and the like, other forms of healthcare, etc, even if they 'contradict' religious doctrines?
__________________
Hoenn Champion Steven wants to battle!
Aggron (Lv. 57) - Sturdy- (Iron Tail, Stone Edge)
Metagross (Lv. 59) - Clear Body - (Meteor Mash, Zen Headbutt)
ORAS Release Staff Collab 2014
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old July 21st, 2013, 11:55 AM
twocows's Avatar
twocows
Pretentious Intellectual Jerk
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Nature: Lax
Through taxes, yes. Disagreeing with where your tax money is going is not a justifiable reason not to pay them.

They shouldn't have to provide them directly, though. That would be silly.
__________________
Doctors Without Borders: one of the few charity groups you can rely on to actually do real good in the world.

"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all." - H. L. Mencken, unsourced

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"- Isaac Asimov, Column in Newsweek (21 January 1980) [source]
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old July 21st, 2013, 04:06 PM
TRIFORCE89's Avatar
TRIFORCE89
Guide of Darkness
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Temple of Light
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
What twocows said. Pay your taxes, and that's it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old July 21st, 2013, 04:52 PM
NurseBarbra's Avatar
NurseBarbra
くら くら?
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Brave
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to NurseBarbra
This is the first post back from my break that i'll post a reply to.

Being raised both Irish and catholic , my first response was "Churches don't pay tax though..."
Looking into it a bit more, I came up with the same reason.

As for the people in the church, be they priest or simple follower, then yes, through taxes is acceptable. Just because someone doesn't want to take the option of contraceptives doesn't mean others do as well.
Taxes pay for everything, from Roads, Hospitals, Military spending (though in Ireland we don't have what you'd call a military), Education, ect.
I don't like the fact that my taxes pay for Bank debt in my country that I didn't cause, but it doesn't give me the right to demand my money back specifically for that. (i think i went off topic but still)
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old July 21st, 2013, 08:04 PM
Esper's Avatar
Esper
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
If a religious institution wants to do anything in the world outside religion then they should play by those rules. So then if you had a Catholic hospital they should act like a hospital since that’s the role they've chosen to adopt. If you’re not going to meet your obligations, don’t take on the responsibility.

A church or whatever that is acting strictly as a church obviously shouldn't even need to worry about this kind of thing since the only people they should be paying should be priests or whoever and they'll already agree with whatever the church stands for.

"Religious institution" should be very, very narrowly defined. If not, there's too much room for people with strong religious beliefs to abuse their positions of authority in non-religious areas.
__________________

deviantart blog pair
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old August 11th, 2013, 09:05 PM
Livewire's Avatar
Livewire
League Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Victory Road
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via Skype™ to Livewire
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarf View Post
If a religious institution wants to do anything in the world outside religion then they should play by those rules. So then if you had a Catholic hospital they should act like a hospital since that’s the role they've chosen to adopt. If you’re not going to meet your obligations, don’t take on the responsibility.

A church or whatever that is acting strictly as a church obviously shouldn't even need to worry about this kind of thing since the only people they should be paying should be priests or whoever and they'll already agree with whatever the church stands for.

"Religious institution" should be very, very narrowly defined. If not, there's too much room for people with strong religious beliefs to abuse their positions of authority in non-religious areas.
I agree completely. Although part of me would say that if they're going to be a Catholic Hospital, then there's to be no "interference" with it comes to abortion, contraception, end-of-life procedures, etc.
__________________
Hoenn Champion Steven wants to battle!
Aggron (Lv. 57) - Sturdy- (Iron Tail, Stone Edge)
Metagross (Lv. 59) - Clear Body - (Meteor Mash, Zen Headbutt)
ORAS Release Staff Collab 2014
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old August 12th, 2013, 11:00 AM
Esper's Avatar
Esper
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livewire View Post
I agree completely. Although part of me would say that if they're going to be a Catholic Hospital, then there's to be no "interference" with it comes to abortion, contraception, end-of-life procedures, etc.
Do you mean interference by non-Catholics with the Catholic distaste for abortion and contraception, meaning Catholic hospitals should be allowed to opt out of providing those services, or do you mean Catholic Hospitals shouldn't interfere with providing those services?
__________________

deviantart blog pair
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old August 12th, 2013, 02:03 PM
Livewire's Avatar
Livewire
League Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Victory Road
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via Skype™ to Livewire
The Hospital should be forced to provide those services if the need arises.
__________________
Hoenn Champion Steven wants to battle!
Aggron (Lv. 57) - Sturdy- (Iron Tail, Stone Edge)
Metagross (Lv. 59) - Clear Body - (Meteor Mash, Zen Headbutt)
ORAS Release Staff Collab 2014
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old August 13th, 2013, 10:38 AM
Psycho Yuffie's Avatar
Psycho Yuffie
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Nature: Quirky
It's not just that catholic hospitals don't want to be involved with contraception, abortion, and the like. They also have a tendency of being extremely unaccommodating toward queer people. For instance, they still won't allow same-sex spouses to see their hurt partner. They used to hide under the guise that they aren't legally married, but that's no longer an option where I live--but they still do it anyway. They also don't allow treatment for transgender people. I have to drive an half and a half to get to a clinic that isn't affiliated with the catholic church to go to a doctor that supports transgender people.
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old August 13th, 2013, 10:44 AM
Silais's Avatar
Silais
Princess of the Law
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Gender: Female
Nature: Quiet
I believe they should. The idea of a religious hospital honestly feels like an oxymoron to me. The fact that some medical institutions can deny people fundamental reproductive rights seems like a constitutional issue that needs to be fixed. Sorry, but I'm a bit tired of religious institutions getting free passes and having little to no consequences for their human rights violations.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old August 13th, 2013, 11:27 AM
The Dark Avenger's Avatar
The Dark Avenger
The Flyest Avenger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The States
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Though, we should also understand the usefulness of religious hospitals. The staff are paid much lower, many of whom volunteer, and they have provided many indigent families with medical care, they otherwise could not afford before the secular hospital ever existed.

"In 2012, the church operated 12.6% of hospitals in the USA, accounting for 15.6% of all admissions, and around 14.5% of hospital expenses (c. 98.6 billion dollars). Compared to the public system, the church provided greater financial assistance or free care to poor patients, and was a leading provider of various low-profit health services such as breast cancer screenings, nutrition programs, trauma, and care of the elderly."

The Church takes a HUGE financial burden off the US Healthcare System and has been involved in healthcare since the inception of the United States. Further, religious institutions operated most hospitals predating the 19th century. So it's not really an "oxymoron" or a contradiction of duties since history demonstrates otherwise.

And Psycho Yuffe, they do allow the treatment of transgender people, they don't specialize in treatment specifically tailored to transgender people though. If you had a broken arm, they would treat you. Same for other LGBT people. For patients with special LGBT needs, they should seek out help from specific healthcare institutions and doctors that specialize in those needs. These hospitals usual have doctors with a broader fields of medicine. For instance, around 1% or less of the population is transgender and the field of study is fairly new. There are only a handful of specialists that exist for the treatments, and these hospitals can't afford to hire those specialists.

I will say emergency abortion is a topic that should be discussed. Since, the mother's life is at stake, and the option to go to another hospital may not exist. Therefore, these hospitals should have the duty to provide in the best interest of the woman's health. However, if a woman decides to have an elective abortion, then the Church shouldn't have to provide the service.

These healthcare facilities are an integral component of the US healthcare system, they are currently NEEDED given the amount of care they provide with lower wages, saving hundreds of billions of dollars each year. Though, yes, some hospitals don't provide care for HIV medications for instance, ect, they lower the burden of other hospitals in other costs, of which would hike up healthcare costs for LGBT patients at secular hospitals. The existence of these hospitals benefits everyone's healthcare needs.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old August 15th, 2013, 06:41 AM
Slayer1986's Avatar
Slayer1986
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Norway
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Nature: Lonely
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenneking View Post
Though, we should also understand the usefulness of religious hospitals. The staff are paid much lower, many of whom volunteer, and they have provided many indigent families with medical care, they otherwise could not afford before the secular hospital ever existed.

"In 2012, the church operated 12.6% of hospitals in the USA, accounting for 15.6% of all admissions, and around 14.5% of hospital expenses (c. 98.6 billion dollars). Compared to the public system, the church provided greater financial assistance or free care to poor patients, and was a leading provider of various low-profit health services such as breast cancer screenings, nutrition programs, trauma, and care of the elderly."

The Church takes a HUGE financial burden off the US Healthcare System and has been involved in healthcare since the inception of the United States. Further, religious institutions operated most hospitals predating the 19th century. So it's not really an "oxymoron" or a contradiction of duties since history demonstrates otherwise.

And Psycho Yuffe, they do allow the treatment of transgender people, they don't specialize in treatment specifically tailored to transgender people though. If you had a broken arm, they would treat you. Same for other LGBT people. For patients with special LGBT needs, they should seek out help from specific healthcare institutions and doctors that specialize in those needs. These hospitals usual have doctors with a broader fields of medicine. For instance, around 1% or less of the population is transgender and the field of study is fairly new. There are only a handful of specialists that exist for the treatments, and these hospitals can't afford to hire those specialists.

I will say emergency abortion is a topic that should be discussed. Since, the mother's life is at stake, and the option to go to another hospital may not exist. Therefore, these hospitals should have the duty to provide in the best interest of the woman's health. However, if a woman decides to have an elective abortion, then the Church shouldn't have to provide the service.

These healthcare facilities are an integral component of the US healthcare system, they are currently NEEDED given the amount of care they provide with lower wages, saving hundreds of billions of dollars each year. Though, yes, some hospitals don't provide care for HIV medications for instance, ect, they lower the burden of other hospitals in other costs, of which would hike up healthcare costs for LGBT patients at secular hospitals. The existence of these hospitals benefits everyone's healthcare needs.
That does still not justify the discrimination, and that's the problem. The only way I can see this will fix itself is if people donated more to the cause of universal healthcare to all instead of donating to the church, and one can start putting up taxes on the rich, but that is still yet to happen.
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old August 15th, 2013, 08:55 AM
Psycho Yuffie's Avatar
Psycho Yuffie
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Minnesota, USA
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Nature: Quirky
Exactly. I never said that the catholic church doesn't help. It does a lot of charity work and helps a lot with health care. I was just don't think they need to be dicks about it. If you're trying to help people, it shouldn't matter where they come from, who they are, or who they love. If they need help, you should help them.

Also, your assumption that transgender specialists are expensive is also completely untrue. Any family physician can become a transgender specialist. You don't need to be an endocrinologist to prescribe hormones. My own physician has expressed a desire to help me, but can't because the clinic won't let him because it's affiliated with the catholic church.
Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old August 15th, 2013, 10:30 AM
Esper's Avatar
Esper
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
It's an awkward thing when you have an organization that's doing charity work who also discriminates in who they help. (Excluding reasonable discrimination - helping to fix inner city poverty means you probably won't be helping the hungry in Darfur.)

Ideally we wouldn't have to rely on organizations that discriminate and we'd have the funds for enough medical personnel and facilities so that Catholic or other religiously affiliated hospitals would be an option for people instead of their only choice.

I think we're doing ourselves a disservice in saying that since a Catholic hospital is operating partially on charity it should be excused. I mean, if I were the boss of a business and I had ten employees and one of them didn't want to do certain tasks I'd replace them as soon as I could, even if I had to pay their replacement as much as the other nine. It's just that there isn't the will to pay for enough proper hospitals in some places. *coughAmericacough*
__________________

deviantart blog pair
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.