Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Entertainment & Hobbies > Culture & Media
Reload this Page #1 Singles - Quantity or Longevity?

Notices
For all updates, view the main page.

Culture & Media This is where all of pop culture culminates and chats over a cup of joe. Here you can find discussions relating to the latest and greatest television shows, movies, music and literature, and much more!



Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old December 3rd, 2013 (05:45 PM).
LORD ANTE's Avatar
LORD ANTE LORD ANTE is offline
clearly there's something wrong
ModeratorCS
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Posts: 7,188
Which is more impressive to you: a large number of #1 singles that tend to drop out of the top spots after a short amount of time (one-two weeks) or fewer hit singles that remain at the top for four+ weeks? Beyonce and Christina Aguilera are known for having fewer singles than Rihanna, for instance, but their hit singles tend to have more longevity at the top. Is being able to say 'I have twenty hit singles' better than saying 'I have three' even though those three were at the top for weeks on end?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old December 3rd, 2013 (07:43 PM).
pompayyy's Avatar
pompayyy pompayyy is offline
Forever and Ever
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In a White Room with Black Curtains
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Posts: 487
I've kinda haven't believed in either - a ton of great music goes under the radar. But, if I had to choose one it'd have to be longevity. I find a bit more impressive when a song is in the #1 chart for 4 months than 4 #1 singles in 4 months.
__________________


Pink Moon is on its way.

Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old December 4th, 2013 (12:46 PM).
Esper's Avatar
Esper Esper is offline
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 7,733
Yeah, I don't really hold stock with either, but each is kind of impressive in its own way. If you're the artist responsible for 20 hits (meaning you wrote the music and lyrics and didn't have a team do all that) then that's pretty wow even if they don't last. If you've got 3 or 4 that last for a month that's, well, less impressive since you might just have landed during a dry spell.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old December 28th, 2013 (07:24 PM).
LORD ANTE's Avatar
LORD ANTE LORD ANTE is offline
clearly there's something wrong
ModeratorCS
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Posts: 7,188
Quote originally posted by Esper:
Yeah, I don't really hold stock with either, but each is kind of impressive in its own way. If you're the artist responsible for 20 hits (meaning you wrote the music and lyrics and didn't have a team do all that) then that's pretty wow even if they don't last. If you've got 3 or 4 that last for a month that's, well, less impressive since you might just have landed during a dry spell.
What if the artist co-wrote the songs with a team? Is that any less impressive? What if the artist didn't write at all? Isn't 20 singles still pretty impressive?

I think it's pretty impressive to have more singles than fewer, because longevity doesn't mean the song is any better than other, it just means that it's what the world's idea of trendy is at the time. For instance, people weren't looking for the kind of song Blurred Lines was in 2013, it just made it big because people realized it was the kind of song they wanted to listen to... over and over and over and over. As for having more hit singles, that means your songs are consistently popular, even if not for a long time, because people transition into and out of interest, so.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old December 28th, 2013 (10:05 PM).
Noah Ridgewood's Avatar
Noah Ridgewood Noah Ridgewood is offline
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Gender: Male
Nature: Lax
Posts: 16,925
Honestly, I'm not impressed by neither. The EDM hits on the radio today are absolutely dreadful. Artists like Rihanna bloom in the charts and the reason for that is the people and the people who buy and request her music on the radio are people I don't think have very great taste in music.

Even when it comes to the EDM artists that I do like (really, these days, it's only Lady Gaga), her music is fun and all but nothing I think is all that impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old December 29th, 2013 (12:33 PM).
Controversial?'s Avatar
Controversial? Controversial? is offline
should probably stop now
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: leeds/london. sometimes i travel.
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Posts: 487
Longevity is more memorable. But most #1 singles suck anyways. I'm waiting for the day this dance-pop/electropop/EDM mainstream scene dies like disco.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old January 27th, 2014 (10:11 PM).
acatfrommars's Avatar
acatfrommars acatfrommars is offline
Be a role model
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kentucky
Age: 17
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Posts: 3,043
Send a message via Skype™ to acatfrommars
Singles that remain at the top are my favorite. Classics that have been at the top for long amounts of time should get more praise than a burst a short lived classics.
__________________
When you're having a bad day, just keep going.

Sisters | Brother | Pairs
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links

You may also like.. (Beta)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are UTC -8. The time now is 03:33 PM.