• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

6th Gen What if there was a Pokemon Affinity System?

Miss Doronjo

Gaiden
4,473
Posts
13
Years
The speculated "bond" system with trainers and pokemon got me to thinking; certain pokemon also have affinities with one another, at least according to the pokedex. But, what if in X&Y, introduced a system on where these affinities were incorporated in the games?

For example, take a look at pokemon vs pokemon battles. While there are affinities with pokemon and trainer with happiness, and possibly the newly speculated "bond system" in X&Y, what if there was a system on factoring the relationships between certain pokemon? For example, Zangoose and Seviper have been major enemies for many generations, according to the pokedex. Could these new pokemon games develop a system that factors in the relationship between Zangoose and Seviper? Like, say... maybe they would do more damage to one another? Or maybe the system forces Zangoose and Seviper to stay in battle, so their trainers can't switch out until one of them have fainted?

What about outside of battles? Aside from abilities, when you encounter a wild pokemon, and the pokemon you have at the front of your party has a high affinity for the wild pokemon, the catch rate for the wild pokemon could go up. So, let's take two pokemon with a "high affinity" for an example: Plusle and Minun. If you are trying to catch a wild Minun, and Plusle is at the front of your party, you will have a much higher chance of catching it than if you had, say, a Magikarp at the front.

So, would you like something like this implemented in these games? Do you have any other thoughts?
 

Mark Kamill

I like kitties
2,743
Posts
11
Years
  • Age 30
  • Seen Jun 13, 2023
It makes sense, but it would limit itself to a certain bunch of Pokemon and that's it. Not all Pokemon are tied to each other like the ones you've mentioned, but I can perhaps see it work. Jynx Electrobuzz and Magmar could work, and the birds/rodents/4 footed animals could also have affinities for each other, like Hoothoot and Pidgey or Rattata and Watchog.
 
2,334
Posts
15
Years
  • Age 33
  • Seen Aug 21, 2021
I'm not sure if this would work....it seems a too situational and specific to really work that well. Not every pokemon has an obvious relation to another pokemon, you would have a heap of pokemon who have no preference towards any other pokemon.

I feel like it would work better if pokemon on your team could have friendship/bond values that could be increased (like the current pokemon to trainer friendship levels) between each other. So that having a team that gets along well would give your pokemon boosts and other advantages.

It makes sense in a way, trainers have always had friendship with their pokemon but there isn't much said about how the pokemon on your team get along. They might as well never interact with each other.

So I think you're on the right track, but it needs to be part of a bigger system and not just between two pokemon in a battle.
 

OmegaRuby and AlphaSapphire

10000 year Emperor of Hoenn
17,521
Posts
14
Years
Perhaps there can be attack bonuses between two Pokémon in double battles who are close (sort of like the system in Fire Emblem awakening but for Poke friendship instead of Human friendship/couples)
 

Jake♫

► My Happy Little Pill 
2,941
Posts
15
Years
No, no thank you. I feel like this would just be extremely gimmicky and would affect more than you think it would. Relationships between two Pokémon outside of certain small things (the Rivalry ability and Return/Frustration pretty much) should have no affect on the power of their moves or switching abilities during a battle. It would just make it so much more complicated than it needs to be.
 

Satoshi Ookami

Memento Mori
14,254
Posts
15
Years
I think it would be pretty interesting...
And the fact that it wouldn't be for everyone makes it even better.
It would make people use those Pokémon more.
And as easter egg, it would be pretty nice ;)
It doesn't necessarily need to be feature =) As an easter egg, it works pretty well ;)
 
Back
Top