Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Entertainment & Hobbies > Culture & Media

Notices
For all updates, view the main page.

Culture & Media This is where all of pop culture culminates and chats over a cup of joe. Here you can find discussions relating to the latest and greatest television shows, movies, music and literature, and much more!



Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old August 20th, 2009 (09:08 AM).
Toblerone's Avatar
Toblerone
Which chocolate is the best?
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Gender:
Nature: Lonely
The UK BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) has refused to allow a Japanese movie named "Grotesque" to be shown in cinemas or in fact disributed or sold in the UK.

This scenario is the first for the UK since 2005.

Grotesque is a gory and "sadistic" movie with no plotline or indeed motives involving a main character torturing and mutiliating two other people for seemingly no reason. But, such movies like Saw are as equally gory yet involve a storyline so they are allowed to be aired and distributed in the UK.

I don't find this right at all, as i am a big fan of horror and gore movies. They ban a movie because it lacks storyline. Here's an Atricle about this: http://www.inthenews.co.uk/entertainment/entertainment/quirky/grotesque-film-banned-by-censors-$1319925.htm

PS: If this type of thing is not allowed or does anything to break rules, i am sorry..
__________________


My (now dead) Pc family:
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old August 20th, 2009 (09:33 AM).
peirateis's Avatar
peirateis
This is what's left of us.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 22
Nature: Quirky
Send a message via AIM to peirateis
This is where the ideology of, 'if you don't like it, don't look at it,' comes out. I personally wouldn't go see this movie (even though I love the Saw and Final Destination movies), but I think that a person should absolutely be allowed the right to see this.
__________________

"That government is best which governs least."
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old August 20th, 2009 (09:33 AM).
poopnoodle
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Send a message via Skype™ to poopnoodle
I'm very picky about movies, I can't stand modern horror. And this movie sounds, well, poorly executed...more of a fetish flick than quality entertainment. Whether they ban it or not, people will find some way to get a hold of it.
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old August 20th, 2009 (09:40 AM).
Graceful's Avatar
Graceful
あぁ、たいさ!♥
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Staffordshire, England, UK
Age: 17
Gender: Female
Nature: Quiet
Send a message via Skype™ to Graceful
Exactly what poopnoodle said. People will get it shipped from America(If it does get released there) or even go there....or even japan! People will get hold of it! (I don't want it though)
__________________

And apparently Graceful is still alive after a very long hiatus ♥
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old August 20th, 2009 (10:08 AM).
Rokusasu's Avatar
Rokusasu
Scientist Salarian
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Do not disturb. In lab. Testing.
Nature: Quirky
Ick, horror. ;-; I'm not too fussed about what happens to it, so long as I don't get to see it. XD
__________________
I am the very model of a scientist salarian,
I've studied species turian, asari, and batarian.

Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old August 20th, 2009 (10:13 AM).
Kazukii
Booted out - don't be like me!
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Gender: Female
Nature: Naughty
Quote originally posted by . A k u R o k u .:
Ick, horror. ;-; I'm not too fussed about what happens to it, so long as I don't get to see it. XD
I agree. Anyway, if it is literally just pointless torture and violence with no reasons why.. I agree it shouldn't be aired.
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old August 20th, 2009 (10:33 AM).
Toblerone's Avatar
Toblerone
Which chocolate is the best?
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Gender:
Nature: Lonely
I do understand that the movie lacks storyline and motive etc. but that does not mean it should not be allowed to be shown in the UK. Some.. well, strange people would want to watch this movie, so even i am a bit for it not getting distributed in UK etc.. But yeah, it'll get into the UK no matter what, and despite me being a fan of the Horror genre i'd prefer a comedy any day. I'm just thinking the UK are a bit too, shall we say, over protective, to be honest.
__________________


My (now dead) Pc family:
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old August 20th, 2009 (07:15 PM).
Brainstorm's Avatar
Brainstorm
I'm not smart; I'm random.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 24
The UK was never a place to go for human rights. This should be evident from their banning of the completely innocuous "lolicon", among other things. What good is it to take away people's rights to enjoy something? Society benefits from addition, not subtraction.
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old August 21st, 2009 (03:19 AM).
Toblerone's Avatar
Toblerone
Which chocolate is the best?
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Gender:
Nature: Lonely
Quote originally posted by Brainstorm:
The UK was never a place to go for human rights. This should be evident from their banning of the completely innocuous "lolicon", among other things. What good is it to take away people's rights to enjoy something? Society benefits from addition, not subtraction.
I totally agree with you. They should let it be shown. I hope the makers of the film challenge their decision. They should stop being so over protective and get over it!!
__________________


My (now dead) Pc family:
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old August 21st, 2009 (03:32 AM).
I Laugh at your Misfortune!'s Avatar
I Laugh at your Misfortune!
Normal is a synonym for boring
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YOUR MOTHER! (aka: England)
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
Quote originally posted by Brainstorm:
The UK was never a place to go for human rights. This should be evident from their banning of the completely innocuous "lolicon", among other things. What good is it to take away people's rights to enjoy something? Society benefits from addition, not subtraction.
The idea of a 'lolicon' is that a girl who seems to be very young (i.e. below sixteen) is being portrayed in a sexual manner >.> I wouldn't call that 'innocuous'.

As for the film, I feel that, to be honest, the BBFC has done the right thing. the OP called it 'sadistic' and rightly so. It would be like showing 3 guys 1 hammer in a cinema and there's no way that would be allowed :\
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old August 21st, 2009 (06:19 AM).
Terror's Avatar
Terror
I do all my own stunts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sheffield, UK
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Nature: Bold
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Terror
TBH there is very little gore in any films that are given ratings. Saw and Hostel actually have very little violence or gore in, it's more about suspense.

This film would appear to purely be depicting gore and therefore has been ruled too extreme for the British public.

(I don't necessarily agree, but this is the reason).
__________________

Games owned: Red, Ruby, Sapphire, Leaf Green, Fire Red, Diamond, Platinum.
Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old August 21st, 2009 (12:26 PM).
Gary, the Magic Fairy's Avatar
Gary, the Magic Fairy
Booted out - don't be like me!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Your Mother
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
I can definitely see where they're coming from, banning it in theatres etc. I mean, literally having no plot and being pure, senseless gore doesn't seem like something that should be shown in public. Also, I'd have to disagree with Saw being equally as gory.

Banning DVDs seems a bit too far, though. :\
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old August 21st, 2009 (01:13 PM).
Toblerone's Avatar
Toblerone
Which chocolate is the best?
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Gender:
Nature: Lonely
Yeah you're right, banning it COMPLETELY is just a bit too extreme. Banning from cinemas i can definitely understand, but from the whole country? It just isn't right tbh. Although i can see why they are banning it.
__________________


My (now dead) Pc family:
Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old August 21st, 2009 (04:54 PM). Edited August 21st, 2009 by The Corrupt Plague.
The Corrupt Plague's Avatar
The Corrupt Plague
Missingno. hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Glitch city
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
I don't care how obscene it is, they still have no right to ban it. I will definitely keep a close watch on them because this may be a sign that things are going to get much worse.
__________________

Credit goes to Team Brushfire for the awesome banner!
Reply With Quote
  #15    
Old August 21st, 2009 (07:59 PM).
txteclipse's Avatar
txteclipse
Zero
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Honestly, if I owned a theater or a DVD manufacturing company, I wouldn't show it or produce it even if it was legal, the reasons being a) few people would probably actually come to see it/buy it and b) it's more or less just tasteless gorn that would earn my company way more criticism than praise. It just wouldn't be a sound decision from a business standpoint.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #16    
Old August 24th, 2009 (09:40 AM).
Brainstorm's Avatar
Brainstorm
I'm not smart; I'm random.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 24
Quote originally posted by Screw the rules, I have green hair!:
The idea of a 'lolicon' is that a girl who seems to be very young (i.e. below sixteen) is being portrayed in a sexual manner >.> I wouldn't call that 'innocuous'.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant 2-D lolicon, sexual portrayal of a young girl who isn't real. 2-D lolicons are generally "fairly harmless," because drawn lolicon has just about NO CORRELATION to interest in actual young children. To say viewing 2-D lolicon leads to sexual abuse of children is like saying viewing a guy being shot in an action movie leads to actually shooting someone. There is nearly no correlation to prove they are indeed damaging, so they shouldn't be banned.

These countries banning 2-D lolicon (such as the Philippines and UK) are passing laws to crush a tiny minority of the population to their will with emotional appeal rather than solid proof. Here's an example. Let's say you like eating strawberries. But your country has decided to ban strawberries. Why? Because a few terrible criminals openingly expressed love for strawberries, and it's now publicly agreed to be a terrible fruit. Your country didn't even try to use formal statistics to prove it's action of taking people's RIGHTS away. Wouldn't you be angry at something so preposterous?

Quote originally posted by Screw the rules, I have green hair!:
As for the film, I feel that, to be honest, the BBFC has done the right thing. the OP called it 'sadistic' and rightly so. It would be like showing 3 guys 1 hammer in a cinema and there's no way that would be allowed :\
If people want to see a sick sadistic movie, let them. They asked for it. As in the first paragraph of mine on this post, it's nigh improbable that the movie will turn anyone into a sadistic person.
Reply With Quote
  #17    
Old August 24th, 2009 (03:00 PM).
Terror's Avatar
Terror
I do all my own stunts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sheffield, UK
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Nature: Bold
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Terror
Quote originally posted by Brainstorm:
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant 2-D lolicon, sexual portrayal of a young girl who isn't real. 2-D lolicons are generally "fairly harmless," because drawn lolicon has just about NO CORRELATION to interest in actual young children. To say viewing 2-D lolicon leads to sexual abuse of children is like saying viewing a guy being shot in an action movie leads to actually shooting someone. There is nearly no correlation to prove they are indeed damaging, so they shouldn't be banned.

These countries banning 2-D lolicon (such as the Philippines and UK) are passing laws to crush a tiny minority of the population to their will with emotional appeal rather than solid proof. Here's an example. Let's say you like eating strawberries. But your country has decided to ban strawberries. Why? Because a few terrible criminals openingly expressed love for strawberries, and it's now publicly agreed to be a terrible fruit. Your country didn't even try to use formal statistics to prove it's action of taking people's RIGHTS away. Wouldn't you be angry at something so preposterous?
TBH while I have no problem at all with lolicon there are things that are much less likely to lead to criminal behavior that are illegal. I don't really have a problem with it being banned, I can kind of understand why it has been made illegal (but I think it's ******** that it was just introduced, it meant that people who had never broken a law ever were suddenly forced to wipe their HDs, or whatever, there should have been a "cool down" period.) I think the main reason for having it b& would be because it would become hard to distinguish between lolicon and 3d rendered "pseudo-photographs" (which were already illegal) at some point, so it's easier to outlaw it all rather than try to define some kind of boundary.
__________________

Games owned: Red, Ruby, Sapphire, Leaf Green, Fire Red, Diamond, Platinum.
Reply With Quote
  #18    
Old August 27th, 2009 (01:04 AM).
s0nido's Avatar
s0nido
turn up the engine
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laverre City
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
Send a message via Skype™ to s0nido
It really depends whether the movie is worth airing in the cinemas and whether people would actually want to watch it or not. The movie probably didn't get much appreciation before by others, unlike Saw, and so the British government didn't see it fit to be aired in cinemas.
Reply With Quote
  #19    
Old August 27th, 2009 (03:02 PM).
Neutrino's Avatar
Neutrino
The Jelly-Stuff of legend...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leeds, England
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Aww... I love gory movies, but that sounds like a really crap movie, so I'm agreeing with my government, it sounds like a rubbish movie, and it probably wouldn't sell anyway.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 05:37 AM.