The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Off-Topic Discussions > Discussions & Debates
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices

Discussions & Debates The place to go for slightly more in-depth topics. Discussions and debates about the world, current events, ideas, news, and more.


Advertise here

View Poll Results: Would you watch the Paralympics?
Yes, I would watch both. 3 18.75%
No, I'd only watch the Olympics. 7 43.75%
I'd watch the Paralympics, more than the Olympics. 0 0%
I don't really care for the Olympics. 6 37.50%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.  
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old March 21st, 2010, 07:31 PM
Team Fail's Avatar
Team Fail
The fine line between in|sanity
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Nature: Brave

Advertise here
So, who here watched the 2010 Winter Olmpics?

... Ok, so what if you did. That's beside the point. What I'm talking about is the Paralympics. I noticed something. During the Olympics, they were extensively comered on all of Canada's and the US' major networks, like Sportsnet, TSN, CTV, CBC, ABC, and NBC. Than comes along the Paralympics. They are only broadcast on Sportsnet. The only way any other station covers it it by breaking news in the sports section of the news or Olympic Alerts. I don't think it's very fair that the Paralympics aren't covered as much as the Olympics. In fact, I think it's discrimatory. What do you think? Should the Paralympics be more watched, like tje Olympics, or shouldn't they?
__________________

Pairs:
Kevin, Echidna
Follow me on Twitter! @TeamFail
Alt 1, リザードン
Miiverse
Pokémon Hackers Online
Alt 2: Jack Cayman



[04:20.39] <@GoGo> I WILL INSERT WITH PLEASURE
[04:20.45] <@GoGo> shut it Bela

[05:41.55] <Team_Fail> Blue Spider is interesting, but #MEHMasterRace
[05:42.20] <diegoisawesome> Team_Fail: Sounds like a bunch of unmotivated people that still want to try to take over the world
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old March 21st, 2010, 07:46 PM
IceSage's Avatar
IceSage
Sage of Ice
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 29
Nature: Modest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Fail View Post
So, who here watched the 2010 Winter Olmpics?

... Ok, so what if you did. That's beside the point. What I'm talking about is the Paralympics. I noticed something. During the Olympics, they were extensively comered on all of Canada's and the US' major networks, like Sportsnet, TSN, CTV, CBC, ABC, and NBC. Than comes along the Paralympics. They are only broadcast on Sportsnet. The only way any other station covers it it by breaking news in the sports section of the news or Olympic Alerts. I don't think it's very fair that the Paralympics aren't covered as much as the Olympics. In fact, I think it's discrimatory. What do you think? Should the Paralympics be more watched, like tje Olympics, or shouldn't they?
It's not covered as highly because it's NOT the Olympics. It's something else, although the same premise. It's exactly in the same field as why your local high school basketball tournament isn't being aired on prime time... They're both basketball, they're both actually rather important, but they're just not in the same field or category.

Another way to view it is that the Olympics are for the "best of the best," and the Paralympics are for the "Best of the completely underpar."
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old March 21st, 2010, 08:03 PM
Feign's Avatar
Feign
Clain
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Nature: Quirky
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceSage View Post
It's not covered as highly because it's NOT the Olympics. It's something else, although the same premise. It's exactly in the same field as why your local high school basketball tournament isn't being aired on prime time... They're both basketball, they're both actually rather important, but they're just not in the same field or category.

Another way to view it is that the Olympics are for the "best of the best," and the Paralympics are for the "Best of the completely underpar."
Not the reason at all... It is the Olympics, it's just for different people.

Simply put, the paralympics, does not generate as much viewership, and thus does not contribute to much monetary gain, so networks have little reason to have extensive coverage when they would not be making as much money on that.

That and they are not obliged to have to cover it. There could also be exclusive coverage rights as well. That is to say, only x network paid so that they were the only ones [needed] to cover it.

Basically, it's not about whether or not it is the Olympics or not, but rather it boils down to if it will generate much viewership and as the end, money.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old March 21st, 2010, 08:05 PM
Yoshimi's Avatar
Yoshimi
☆「GANG-STAR」☆
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Question.

Would it be discrimination for non-handicapped people if the Paralympics got more coverage than the Olympics?
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old March 21st, 2010, 08:12 PM
Feign's Avatar
Feign
Clain
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Nature: Quirky
Why wouldn't it be?

But that isn't the topic at hand.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old March 21st, 2010, 10:11 PM
bmah's Avatar
bmah
B.A.M.
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 26
Nature: Relaxed
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to bmah
I think it's going too far to say that the meager view coverage of the Paralympics is discriminatory to paraplegics alike; I think the reason's due to a combination of not being directly enough associated with the main Olympics, and the fact that it occurs well after the main Olympic events. It IS a part of the Olympics as a whole, but it's still treated as an entity separate enough to leave viewers less interested. So the decrease in viewership as already mentioned leads to a decrease in advertising since revenues won't be generated on the same scale as the main Olympic events are.

I also think it's just as much going too far to describe the Paralympics as "best of the underpar". There's got to be a better word than "underpar" to describe Paralympians, because "underpar" is a broadly defining term that means more or less "undercapable" rather than a term that simply divides Olympians from Paralympians.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old March 21st, 2010, 10:32 PM
Cherrim's Avatar
Cherrim
the blossom pokémon
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Waterloo, ON
Age: 25
Gender: Female
Nature: Relaxed
I don't know whether this should stay here in Other Chat or head over to Other Entertainment. It's more of a discussion regarding the ethics/discrimination behind the event['s coverage] than it is the sports or the event itself so... it kind of fits in both. :/ I'll leave the decision to someone who is not falling asleep at her keyboard at 2am.

But this thread made me think of a related article that I came across the other week. I thought it was an interesting read.

edit: The poll kind of needs an "I'd watch the Olympics more than the Paralympics" option if it has one of the opposite. :/
__________________

previously known as lightning.
tumblrtwitter


Last edited by Cherrim; March 21st, 2010 at 10:34 PM. Reason: fixing like 10 typos omg
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old March 21st, 2010, 10:37 PM
bmah's Avatar
bmah
B.A.M.
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 26
Nature: Relaxed
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to bmah
Oh, right. I forgot to mention in my earlier post that yes, the Vancouver Paralympics was the most successful Paralympics as of yet, so I think there could be a turning point in the number of coverage hours and viewership. Many views on the Olympics this year has changed for the better, so perhaps subsequent Olympics will continue with the positive trend.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old March 22nd, 2010, 05:11 AM
Team Fail's Avatar
Team Fail
The fine line between in|sanity
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Nature: Brave
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightning View Post
edit: The poll kind of needs an "I'd watch the Olympics more than the Paralympics" option if it has one of the opposite. :/
That'd be the "No, I'd only watch the Olympics" option.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmah View Post
Oh, right. I forgot to mention in my earlier post that yes, the Vancouver Paralympics was the most successful Paralympics as of yet, so I think there could be a turning point in the number of coverage hours and viewership. Many views on the Olympics this year has changed for the better, so perhaps subsequent Olympics will continue with the positive trend.
I think the tickets sold out within a matter of days, which is really good. That could boost ratings and have more people watching.

Above, I saw someone say that they were the best of underpar. I don't think so. I think they are the best of the best, in their ability and skill level. They are missing a few body parts, like a leg or an arm, but it doesn't make them "not the best".
__________________

Pairs:
Kevin, Echidna
Follow me on Twitter! @TeamFail
Alt 1, リザードン
Miiverse
Pokémon Hackers Online
Alt 2: Jack Cayman



[04:20.39] <@GoGo> I WILL INSERT WITH PLEASURE
[04:20.45] <@GoGo> shut it Bela

[05:41.55] <Team_Fail> Blue Spider is interesting, but #MEHMasterRace
[05:42.20] <diegoisawesome> Team_Fail: Sounds like a bunch of unmotivated people that still want to try to take over the world
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old March 22nd, 2010, 09:39 AM
Magic's Avatar
Magic
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Over in the UK there is fairly good coverage of the paralympics I'd say, however there is a lot less content wise (far less competitors) and so it is bound to be less publicised as it is a smaller event.

Quote:
Another way to view it is that the Olympics are for the "best of the best," and the Paralympics are for the "Best of the completely underpar."
That is truly offensive to all people with a disability. Just because they are disability doesn't mean they are -underpar/below average/bad- at ANY area of their life and the paralympians show quite clearly how skilled they are and how well they have compensated for their disability.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old March 23rd, 2010, 07:18 AM
I Laugh at your Misfortune!'s Avatar
I Laugh at your Misfortune!
Normal is a synonym for boring
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YOUR MOTHER! (aka: England)
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
The way I see it, the majority of the world is not disabled. As such, they have a greater interest in things aimed at people who are not disabled. As such, the majority of the world is more interested in the regular Olympics. No discrimination, just simple logic.

Think of it this way. I am British and male. Therefore, I'm probably more likely to watch the men's events and I'm more likely to watch events that Britain is competing in. Once again, logical and natural behaviour. Not discrimination.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old March 23rd, 2010, 11:21 AM
Prince_of_Light's Avatar
Prince_of_Light
wins.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via AIM to Prince_of_Light Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Prince_of_Light Send a message via Yahoo to Prince_of_Light
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Laugh at your Misfortune! View Post
The way I see it, the majority of the world is not disabled. As such, they have a greater interest in things aimed at people who are not disabled. As such, the majority of the world is more interested in the regular Olympics. No discrimination, just simple logic.

Think of it this way. I am British and male. Therefore, I'm probably more likely to watch the men's events and I'm more likely to watch events that Britain is competing in. Once again, logical and natural behaviour. Not discrimination.
Alright. The only reason I'm even posting here was because I saw I Laugh At Your Misfortune's username attached to this thread and I was just like OMG LOL.



XDD

But anyways. Honestly I really don't think it's discrimination. If most people don't want to watch it, then it's not going to be covered very much. Media outlets aren't controlled by government entities, so there's really no argument for "fairness" except solely on moral grounds, not by legal ones. This is because the media outlets can pick and choose what they wish to air.
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old March 23rd, 2010, 11:52 AM
Cherrim's Avatar
Cherrim
the blossom pokémon
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Waterloo, ON
Age: 25
Gender: Female
Nature: Relaxed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Fail View Post
That'd be the "No, I'd only watch the Olympics" option.
But if it were more available, I would totally watch some of the events in the Paralympics. Just not to the same extent that I watch the (winter) Olympics. :/
__________________

previously known as lightning.
tumblrtwitter

Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old March 23rd, 2010, 02:07 PM
Rokusasu's Avatar
Rokusasu
Scientist Salarian
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Do not disturb. In lab. Testing.
Nature: Quirky
We do watch the Paralympics in my house like we do the Olympics, but this is because it's available to us (arguably not as much as the Olympics). For me, it's great seeing those with disabilities achieve what the 'normal' athletes can- really inspiring.
__________________
I am the very model of a scientist salarian,
I've studied species turian, asari, and batarian.

Reply With Quote
  #15    
Old March 23rd, 2010, 02:09 PM
TRIFORCE89's Avatar
TRIFORCE89
Guide of Darkness
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Temple of Light
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Mmmm... it may be discriminatory, but I think the stations are somewhat justified.

It costs a lot to cover the games and put your shows on hiatus for a while. And the paralympic games don't draw in the viewers like the winter Olympics do. And as a broadcater, you goal is to get people watching so that people watch commercials. Bottom line. The winter olympics bring people in. Even channels who aren't covering it are affected and switch to reruns for a lot of shows because no one will be watching. The paralympics don't do that.

If the paralympics don't meet that objective, then they're better off on a speciality channel like Sportsnet where people you want to watch it will turn it. Just like how you have gardening shows of HGTV instead of Global. Niche market.

Not to say the paralympic athletes are talented. It's just the public doesn't care as much even though when asked they might say other wise. That's just the political correct thing to do.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links


Advertise here
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.