< >
Hello, guest! Please log in or register.

The PokéCommunity

Go Back     The PokéCommunity Forums > The Wide World of Pokémon > Pokémon General Pokemon "clones".

Notices

Pokémon General The home for theories, clubs, polls, and other discussions involving the Pokémon franchise that aren't covered in any of the other boards.

Reply Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old March 25th, 2011 (1:46 PM).
Miss Doronjo's Avatar
Miss Doronjo Miss Doronjo is offline
Gaiden
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
Posts: 4,490
Oh yeah, there are a ton of pokemon out there that are considered "clones" from an original, because their art work is very alike in a way. Whether be th ebody, or facial features, and so on. Pluse and Minun are good examples, because it said that they are clones from Pikachu.



Well anyway, can you think of any other pokemon "clones" from a certain pokemon? How do you feel about these pokemon "clones"? Are they really nessesary?

Hawthorne Guardian
Moderator of Video Games
Paired to: Perdition Haze

Pokémon:PhoenixRising
Sylvie
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old March 25th, 2011 (2:21 PM).
Timbjerr's Avatar
Timbjerr Timbjerr is offline
T-o-X-i-C
Platinum Tier
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Nature: Timid
Posts: 7,428
A ton of GenV pokemon are considered to be a newer counterpart to older GenI-II pokemon. This was probably intentional to make sure that the games retain the proper pokemon "feel" without recycling all the old pokemon. XD

=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old March 25th, 2011 (4:28 PM).
Mr Cat Dog's Avatar
Mr Cat Dog Mr Cat Dog is offline
<insert witty eloquence here>
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Posts: 10,913
I assume many people jump on 'clones' as evidence that the designers have lost their originality and can't think of anything new. As much as I'd like to play devil's advocate and argue against this, it's very hard to do so. Most of them do feel derivative, don't have particularly striking new aesthetic features, have similar movesets barring new 'signature moves' designed in order. As Timbjerr noted above, continuity in keeping certain 'types' of Pokemon despite not having the originals seems to be the main factor in doing this, especially with the newest generation. Seems a shame that the designers aren't willing to experiment slightly more with not only the look, but some of the moveset elements of the new Pokemon in a given generation.
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old March 25th, 2011 (5:47 PM). Edited March 25th, 2011 by Notworking15.
Notworking15's Avatar
Notworking15 Notworking15 is offline
Wait...WHAT?!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 66
i was always convinced that certain pokemon are "cousins" of past generations. like plusle/minun, Pachirisu, and emolga were bizzaringly related to pikachu. or woobat and zubat sounding obviously similar. and for some reason, always thought skitty/delcatty was kind of like another meowth/persian.
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old March 25th, 2011 (6:15 PM).
Gunn's Avatar
Gunn Gunn is offline
horror resident
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nevada, United States
Posts: 1,406
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Gunn
Adding on to Pikachu, Emolga and Pachirisu (maybe Marril too) are other ones. The developers like having this series of cute rodent Pokemon going on, not that I mind. There's doubt that we will won't see one implemented in Generation VI.
Mr. Scratch, who is played by Ilkka Villi.... Ilkka what? Who the hell?
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old March 25th, 2011 (8:15 PM).
King Gumball's Avatar
King Gumball King Gumball is offline
Haven't been here for ages...
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Gender: Male
Nature: Modest
Posts: 2,184
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to King Gumball
I still dont see why everyone thinks Munna is a copy of Drowzee. That is seriously crazy @_@ They look NOTHING alike other than the fact they are based on the same animal.
Please Click:




Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old March 25th, 2011 (8:23 PM).
Miss Doronjo's Avatar
Miss Doronjo Miss Doronjo is offline
Gaiden
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
Posts: 4,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Gumball View Post
I still dont see why everyone thinks Munna is a copy of Drowzee. That is seriously crazy @_@ They look NOTHING alike other than the fact they are based on the same animal.
Yeah...I wonder that too; I guess its also the fact that they are also "dream eater" pokemon?
Other than that, there's not much similar between the two.

Hawthorne Guardian
Moderator of Video Games
Paired to: Perdition Haze

Pokémon:PhoenixRising
Sylvie
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old March 25th, 2011 (8:32 PM).
Zeffy's Avatar
Zeffy Zeffy is offline
angry mushroom
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: T.A.R.D.I.S.
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,172
I think Munna and Drowzee are alike in the dream eater part only. But they look completely different. Emolga looks like Pachirisu, if you ask me. And Timburr is Gen V's Machop, which is always cool. xD
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old March 26th, 2011 (9:09 AM). Edited March 26th, 2011 by mew_nani.
mew_nani's Avatar
mew_nani mew_nani is offline
Pokécommunity's Licensed Tree Exorcist
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Far Lands
Gender: Female
Nature: Brave
Posts: 1,321
Well, you COULD say that some Pokemon are just clones of others....

Only.... Watchog, a supposed a clone of Raticate, looks and acts nothing like it.

Emolga, Pachirisu.... They are similar to Pikachu, in that all three are rodents, all three have the electrical pouches on their cheeks, all are Electric-type... But one's a squirrel, one's a flying squirrel, and one's a mouse. And only Pikachu has red cheek pouches. Emolga and Pachirisu have yellow cheek pouches. So you couldn't really say they're exact clones of Pikachu. Real similar, though.

Of course, Sawsbuck and Stantler are really similar too. :\

I guess some of them are clones of each other... while some of them aren't. It's freaking confusing sometimes, isn't it? :\

I support:
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old March 26th, 2011 (1:23 PM).
jackblaze's Avatar
jackblaze jackblaze is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Anywhere you want me to be
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Posts: 773
none are clones but all are similar, many of us wouldnt be able to make up 3 pokemon who arent similar to the once that already exist much less 600. Even the many fakemon around look like clones to the real ones
Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old March 27th, 2011 (1:02 AM).
PlatinumDude's Avatar
PlatinumDude PlatinumDude is offline
Nyeh?
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Hasty
Posts: 12,473
Send a message via Yahoo to PlatinumDude Send a message via Skype™ to PlatinumDude
The Pidove line is essentially a clone of the Pidgey line. I also see the Drilbur line also being a clone to the Diglett line.

I also think the Scraggy line is a clone to the Croagunk line because of similar appearances.

Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old March 27th, 2011 (2:55 PM).
XtinaIsMeLuvinWWE's Avatar
XtinaIsMeLuvinWWE XtinaIsMeLuvinWWE is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Ireland
Age: 23
Gender: Female
Nature: Quirky
Posts: 1,544
Throh and Sawk seem like parallels of Hitmonlee and Hitmonchan. Not looks-wise, but in concept. I'm not complaining though, just observing

Some of the "clones" I like, sometimes I prefer the originals
http://www.pokecommunity.com/signaturepics/sigpic155452_1.gif
Reply With Quote
Reply Post Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 5:55 PM.


Contact Us Archive Privacy Statement Terms of Service Top