The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Pokémon Gaming > Pokémon Gaming Central
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices

Pokémon Gaming Central For topics that aren't necessarily restricted to one game, Pokémon Gaming Central ranges from comparing and contrasting the differences in the gaming generations to discussing the gaming franchise as a whole.


Advertise here

Reply
Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.  
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old November 15th, 2012, 09:02 PM
Azureth's Avatar
Azureth
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Nature: Calm

Advertise here
We have triple battles, so what if they implemented six vs six? Sounds fun?
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC8hS...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old November 15th, 2012, 09:22 PM
CourageHound's Avatar
CourageHound
Trust & Courage. Nothing More
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Gender: Male
Nature: Lonely
That would depend entirely on the formatting the 6 on 6 battles. If it were super rpg style like in the game BlueDragon - Xbox360 then yea it would be ok as I guess it wouldnt be tooooo chaotic. However......some people disagree.
__________________
Zi-Zi's Journey - Lindsey Stirling
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old November 15th, 2012, 09:48 PM
Pinta77's Avatar
Pinta77
McDonald's Insider
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Jose
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Send a message via Skype™ to Pinta77
No. I'm really not a fan of 3v3. I love double battles, but 3v3 is a bit much and rotation battles are hopelessly confusing.

I want to see the mode when 4 player have a double battle (2 players vs. 2 players) but each has a full party of 6, like what was available on Colosseum multiplayer.
__________________

Wonder Trade!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old November 15th, 2012, 09:52 PM
Powalen's Avatar
Powalen
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: In the sky
Age: 20
Nope. I just like good 'ol fashioned 1 on 1.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old November 15th, 2012, 10:17 PM
Hikamaru's Avatar
Hikamaru
the hamster
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 21
Gender: Female
Nature: Quirky
I'm heavily against this, I'm happy with the system we have now cos it has always been successful.

Although Triple Battles and Rotation Battles were nice and added new strategy, I like the system the way it is now.
__________________


paired with awolfsquared and Starry Windy
battle server | tumblr | profile | credit | supporter

Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old November 15th, 2012, 10:44 PM
The Grubby Pup's Avatar
The Grubby Pup
Where's mah shiny squeaky ball
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lettin' da madness & da music get 2 me!
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Send a message via Skype™ to The Grubby Pup
Nah. 3 on 3 is good enough, to me. I don't think we need 6 on 6, that'll be too many Pokemon out at one time...Well, actually your whole party, if you already got six pokes at that point. Not to mention, that it'll prolly would look really cluttered on the screen.
__________________
Paired with xxkaylabby
Like the Furrets in this picture...everything's true..that's why it's my signature.
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old November 15th, 2012, 10:53 PM
curiousnathan's Avatar
curiousnathan
woop woop
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Nature: Careful
It sounds like fun, but it also sounds really long and tedious. Especially if we were to have to battle a conglomoeration of trainers with six party members. Perhaps if they were somewhat scarce they'd be more fun to battle, and even then they could have relatively hard teams to match their scarcity. While it's a good concept, and I'd definitely welcome more six on six battles, it'd be incredibly tedious to have to battle 4-5 trainers with six pokemon just to pass through a simple route.
__________________
wooper is love,
wooper is life.
moderator | lovely pair | PC live
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old November 15th, 2012, 11:22 PM
bobandbill's Avatar
bobandbill
Where's that sheep...
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Coast - Australia
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
Send a message via AIM to bobandbill Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to bobandbill
It'd be too messy imo, and an awful lot to fit on the screen without inventing a new battle screen presentation for it.... which would be a bit of trouble given they've tried to stick to more or less the same thing already. I feel 3 vs 3 is as much as it's going to get.
__________________


Sheep in the Big City: General Specific
The BBS Forums!
Gain achievements for activity on forums & the games!
Home of Wynaut? Webzine; looking for contributors!
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old November 15th, 2012, 11:33 PM
Correspondence
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
I think that would be taking it a bit too far, it would be too chaotic.Though i would like to see a Triple Tag Battle.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old November 16th, 2012, 06:32 AM
sunshinesan's Avatar
sunshinesan
Pokesho fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Nature: Bold
Pokemon lose their HP too fast for this to take off. If they did a whole new revamp with their battle system(not going to happen), then 3v3+ formats might be possible.
__________________

Currently playing as of 10/26/2012: POKEMON WHITE 2
FC: 3826 6533 5813
Crazy Shenanigans - Click Me
Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old November 16th, 2012, 06:37 AM
Cadence's Avatar
Cadence
Spitfire
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Age: 18
Gender: Female
No, not really.

2v2 is enough.

It would be too hectic for my brain to comprehend, plus, I would think it would take up the whole screen if there were large Pokemon.
__________________
http://ponycraft.net/wp-content/forum-image-uploads/little-pip/2012/06/Ponycraft-Signature-1.png
Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old November 16th, 2012, 06:44 AM
LilJz's Avatar
LilJz
Zoeeyyyyy! ♥
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
No way, 3v3 is goos enough. It'll just clutter the whole screen.
But a tag team 3v3 would awesome tho.
__________________
♥Plusle bro of Autumn Reverie♥ | ♥Pink Mommy, Autumn Reverie, Kanzler, Macarous & Apollo♥
|3DS FC|
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old November 16th, 2012, 06:44 AM
abnegation's Avatar
abnegation
proudly paired with adventure
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Age: 21
I think I'd probably cry. So many move choices to run through, the battle would last way too long. And all you'd need is two level 100 Pokémon with Blizzard and Earthquake to win, basically. Or something to that effect. I guess 6v6 rotation battles wouldn't be a bad idea, but certainly not all on the same playing field in sextuple battles.
__________________
Taking time off from being a Super Moderator on this forum.
I may be back in due course, until then I will be inactive.
Now you're aware.

the internet is full of people who refuse to be nice to others
because they feel that this makes them superior
that's lame
Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old November 16th, 2012, 07:03 AM
Sora's Avatar
Sora
The Keyblade Pokémon
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Under Red's Bed
Nature: Gentle
Oh gosh no. please no. 3v3 is enough. Although the idea of 6v6 rotation battles would be interesting and would definitely need some careful planning sounds interesting. It's far better than 6v6 with all twelve Pokemon on the screen at once haha.
__________________
BETTER THAN YESTERDAY
MY DREAM WILL BE FULFILLED
Reply With Quote
  #15    
Old November 16th, 2012, 09:08 AM
Olli's Avatar
Olli
I wanna see you be brave
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Skyloft
Gender: Male
I'd have to say no. It'd be waaay too messy and complicated, and there'd be too much to keep track of it. Even if it was in a typical RPG style format like in other games, it just wouldn't feel like actual Pokemon battles. I prefer single battles over pretty much everything, I can live with double battles since they're similar, and triple battles are just barely there, but if 6v6 battles were implemented, I'd really hate it. There's a chance that like the majority of your team could be wipe out with a single attack, and it'd just be too tedious imo. I don't think we should venture anywhere above 3v3, otherwise I will cry :(
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16    
Old November 16th, 2012, 10:31 AM
PlatinumDude's Avatar
PlatinumDude
Nyeh?
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Hasty
Send a message via Yahoo to PlatinumDude Send a message via Skype™ to PlatinumDude
As mentioned above, it'd be too cluttered for a 6-on-6 battle to take place, so I'm saying no to 6-on-6 battles. Plus, it kills the strategy of switching Pokemon to gain advantage.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #17    
Old November 16th, 2012, 04:05 PM
imevil's Avatar
imevil
Biggest Scyther Fan
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 'MURICA
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
6 on 6 would probably be the lolz with friends and maybe a few post game battles in game, but nothing serious. I mean, Earthquake and Surf both mean GG

AND BTW 500th POST
__________________
Chalenges:
Ruby Solo Run (Blaziken)-Complete!
Soul Silver Monotype Flying- COMPLETE
Emerald Second City Challenge- COMPLETE
ULTIMATE MONOTYPE WATER!
Fire Red (COMPLETE) -> Crystal (COMPLETE) -> Emerald (COMPLETE) -> Platinum(COMPLETE -> Black 2

Hunger Games Challenge- District 8: Ruby 2/8




Reply With Quote
  #18    
Old November 16th, 2012, 04:13 PM
Mochi's Avatar
Mochi
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Age: 21
Gender: Female
Nature: Sassy
I don't even like 3v3 and rotation battles, I can't even begin to imagine 6v6. I mean that's your whole entire team out there, right there, front and center. Absolutely no element of surprise.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19    
Old November 17th, 2012, 10:30 PM
Brendino's Avatar
Brendino
#fpt2014
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Colombie-Britannique
Age: 22
Nature: Quiet
I really hope they don't add 6 vs. 6 battles in the future, as I felt that Triple Battles already cross the line a bit (I'm a little more lenient towards Rotation Battles, but feel that something like this would we better suited for a Battle Frontier like situation). Personally, I'm not even a fan of 2 vs. 2 battles, so I think that 6 vs. 6 battles would just get needlessly complicated and have very little appeal.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20    
Old November 18th, 2012, 04:45 AM
von Weltschmerz
the first born unicorn
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Double Battle are fine enough, thank. Triple battles were like that movie sequel of a good movie that is just plain awful because they copied the first one exactly, expecting that, if it was so successful, that a similar sequel would be. And well... that's just not that case. Six on Six would be like making a threequel o.o It serves no real purpose, it adds no real value to the game... It makes you think about strategy... A LITTLE... but in the story line yuo don't need a whole lotta that.
__________________
Being wrong isn't "bad", failing to admit that you are, is.
Reply With Quote
  #21    
Old November 18th, 2012, 07:21 AM
Sverige's Avatar
Sverige
#justiceforbionic 11.11.13
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Gender: Male
As long as they aren't rotational.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22    
Old November 18th, 2012, 10:26 AM
Kahisys's Avatar
Kahisys
Unhatched Egg
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: France
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Lonely
6 vs 6's way too much. It's already quite a mess with 3 vs 3, and I really don't imagine more Pokemon into a single battle.
__________________
My beloved team !
Reply With Quote
  #23    
Old November 18th, 2012, 11:18 AM
awolfsquared's Avatar
awolfsquared
I like to do 'Garfield Mondays'
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: St.Louis,Missouri
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Modest
Send a message via Skype™ to awolfsquared
I don't think a 6v6 battle could fit on the screen that well. It would end up looking too messy. 3 v 3 is already pretty complicated and so 6 vs 6 would be even more hectic.
__________________

"I have no idea what I'm doing. but I know I'm doing it really, really well."- Andy Dwyer
DeviantArt | Tumblr | Art Gallery | Ask Me Stuff | Paired to
Reply With Quote
  #24    
Old November 18th, 2012, 11:32 AM
Doppelgänger's Avatar
Doppelgänger
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Jersey
Age: 21
Gender: Male
No way. It would be way too crowded and complicated. I think that 3 on 3 is the most that should be done.
__________________

"A living, breathing, double of oneself usually tormenting the person they look like..."
Reply With Quote
  #25    
Old November 18th, 2012, 11:56 AM
Iceman3317's Avatar
Iceman3317
Kalos Explorer!
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mistralton City
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
I don't like the idea about 6 on 6. 3 on 3 are annoying enough. Don't think I'd lke 6 on 6 at all. But I do love 2 on 2.
__________________
Friend Code - 2251 4942 3229
Friend Safari Pokemon - Abra, Espurr, and Duosion
Pm me with your FC so I can add you if you add me.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links


Advertise here
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.