The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Pokémon Gaming > Pokémon Gaming Central
Reload this Page Would you like to see six vs. six battles?
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Daily Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read


Pokémon Gaming Central For topics that aren't necessarily restricted to one game, Pokémon Gaming Central ranges from comparing and contrasting the differences in the gaming generations to discussing the gaming franchise as a whole.
Sort Threads: Spinoff Central

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old November 15th, 2012 (9:02 PM).
Azureth's Avatar
Azureth Azureth is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Nature: Calm
Posts: 210
We have triple battles, so what if they implemented six vs six? Sounds fun?
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC8hSuHV8Ao&feature=related
Reply With Quote

Relevant Advertising!

  #2    
Old November 15th, 2012 (9:22 PM).
CourageHound's Avatar
CourageHound CourageHound is offline
Trust & Courage. Nothing More
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Gender: Male
Nature: Lonely
Posts: 823
That would depend entirely on the formatting the 6 on 6 battles. If it were super rpg style like in the game BlueDragon - Xbox360 then yea it would be ok as I guess it wouldnt be tooooo chaotic. However......some people disagree.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3    
Old November 15th, 2012 (9:48 PM).
Pinta77's Avatar
Pinta77 Pinta77 is offline
Swadloon Trainer
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Jose
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Posts: 690
Send a message via Skype™ to Pinta77
No. I'm really not a fan of 3v3. I love double battles, but 3v3 is a bit much and rotation battles are hopelessly confusing.

I want to see the mode when 4 player have a double battle (2 players vs. 2 players) but each has a full party of 6, like what was available on Colosseum multiplayer.
__________________

Wonder Trade!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4    
Old November 15th, 2012 (9:52 PM).
Castform's Avatar
Castform Castform is online now
ModeratorBSCS
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Weather Institute in Hoenn
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Modest
Posts: 16,124
Send a message via Skype™ to Castform
Nope. I just like good 'ol fashioned 1 on 1.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5    
Old November 15th, 2012 (10:17 PM).
Hikamaru's Avatar
Hikamaru Hikamaru is offline
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 23
Gender: Female
Nature: Quirky
Posts: 38,028
I'm heavily against this, I'm happy with the system we have now cos it has always been successful.

Although Triple Battles and Rotation Battles were nice and added new strategy, I like the system the way it is now.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6    
Old November 15th, 2012 (10:44 PM).
The Grubby Pup's Avatar
The Grubby Pup The Grubby Pup is offline
Where's mah shiny squeaky ball
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lettin' da madness & da music get 2 me!
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Posts: 375
Send a message via Skype™ to The Grubby Pup
Nah. 3 on 3 is good enough, to me. I don't think we need 6 on 6, that'll be too many Pokemon out at one time...Well, actually your whole party, if you already got six pokes at that point. Not to mention, that it'll prolly would look really cluttered on the screen.
__________________
Paired with xxkaylabby
Like the Furrets in this picture...everything's true..that's why it's my signature.
Reply With Quote
  #7    
Old November 15th, 2012 (10:53 PM).
curiousnathan's Avatar
curiousnathan curiousnathan is offline
ModeratorCSPokéCommunity Daily Staff
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Posts: 7,808
It sounds like fun, but it also sounds really long and tedious. Especially if we were to have to battle a conglomoeration of trainers with six party members. Perhaps if they were somewhat scarce they'd be more fun to battle, and even then they could have relatively hard teams to match their scarcity. While it's a good concept, and I'd definitely welcome more six on six battles, it'd be incredibly tedious to have to battle 4-5 trainers with six pokemon just to pass through a simple route.
__________________
mod| pair
Reply With Quote
  #8    
Old November 15th, 2012 (11:22 PM).
bobandbill's Avatar
bobandbill bobandbill is offline
#139
Super ModeratorGTPokéCommunity Daily Staff
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Coast - Australia
Gender: Male
Nature: Jolly
Posts: 11,655
It'd be too messy imo, and an awful lot to fit on the screen without inventing a new battle screen presentation for it.... which would be a bit of trouble given they've tried to stick to more or less the same thing already. I feel 3 vs 3 is as much as it's going to get.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9    
Old November 15th, 2012 (11:33 PM).
Correspondence Correspondence is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 895
I think that would be taking it a bit too far, it would be too chaotic.Though i would like to see a Triple Tag Battle.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10    
Old November 16th, 2012 (6:32 AM).
sunshinesan's Avatar
sunshinesan sunshinesan is offline
Pokesho fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Nature: Bold
Posts: 83
Pokemon lose their HP too fast for this to take off. If they did a whole new revamp with their battle system(not going to happen), then 3v3+ formats might be possible.
__________________

Currently playing as of 10/26/2012: POKEMON WHITE 2
FC: 3826 6533 5813
Crazy Shenanigans - Click Me
Reply With Quote
  #11    
Old November 16th, 2012 (6:37 AM).
Cadence's Avatar
Cadence Cadence is offline
Spitfire
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Age: 20
Gender: Female
Posts: 7
No, not really.

2v2 is enough.

It would be too hectic for my brain to comprehend, plus, I would think it would take up the whole screen if there were large Pokemon.
__________________
http://ponycraft.net/wp-content/forum-image-uploads/little-pip/2012/06/Ponycraft-Signature-1.png
Reply With Quote
  #12    
Old November 16th, 2012 (6:44 AM).
JayD's Avatar
JayD JayD is offline
Legit Boss
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 4,761
No way, 3v3 is goos enough. It'll just clutter the whole screen.
But a tag team 3v3 would awesome tho.
__________________
♥Plusle bro of Autumn Reverie♥ | ♥Pink Mommy, Autumn Reverie, Kanzler, Macarous & Apollo♥
|3DS FC|
Reply With Quote
  #13    
Old November 16th, 2012 (6:44 AM).
Abnegation's Avatar
Abnegation Abnegation is offline
breaker of chains
Platinum Tier
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,788
I think I'd probably cry. So many move choices to run through, the battle would last way too long. And all you'd need is two level 100 Pokémon with Blizzard and Earthquake to win, basically. Or something to that effect. I guess 6v6 rotation battles wouldn't be a bad idea, but certainly not all on the same playing field in sextuple battles.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14    
Old November 16th, 2012 (7:03 AM).
Ash's Avatar
Ash Ash is offline
→ ring a bell
Crystal Tier
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Nature: Gentle
Posts: 10,405
Oh gosh no. please no. 3v3 is enough. Although the idea of 6v6 rotation battles would be interesting and would definitely need some careful planning sounds interesting. It's far better than 6v6 with all twelve Pokemon on the screen at once haha.
__________________
i walk a thousand nights to change the world
Reply With Quote
  #15    
Old November 16th, 2012 (9:08 AM).
Olli's Avatar
Olli Olli is offline
I am still bathing in a summer's afterglow
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Skyloft
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 2,610
I'd have to say no. It'd be waaay too messy and complicated, and there'd be too much to keep track of it. Even if it was in a typical RPG style format like in other games, it just wouldn't feel like actual Pokemon battles. I prefer single battles over pretty much everything, I can live with double battles since they're similar, and triple battles are just barely there, but if 6v6 battles were implemented, I'd really hate it. There's a chance that like the majority of your team could be wipe out with a single attack, and it'd just be too tedious imo. I don't think we should venture anywhere above 3v3, otherwise I will cry :(
__________________
Join some clubs!

Reply With Quote
  #16    
Old November 16th, 2012 (10:31 AM).
PlatinumDude's Avatar
PlatinumDude PlatinumDude is offline
Nyeh?
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Nature: Hasty
Posts: 12,540
Send a message via Yahoo to PlatinumDude Send a message via Skype™ to PlatinumDude
As mentioned above, it'd be too cluttered for a 6-on-6 battle to take place, so I'm saying no to 6-on-6 battles. Plus, it kills the strategy of switching Pokemon to gain advantage.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #17    
Old November 16th, 2012 (4:05 PM).
imevil's Avatar
imevil imevil is offline
Biggest Scyther Fan
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Nature: Sassy
Posts: 701
6 on 6 would probably be the lolz with friends and maybe a few post game battles in game, but nothing serious. I mean, Earthquake and Surf both mean GG

AND BTW 500th POST
__________________
Chalenges:
Ruby Solo Run (Blaziken)-Complete!
Soul Silver Monotype Flying- COMPLETE
Emerald Second City Challenge- COMPLETE
Reply With Quote
  #18    
Old November 16th, 2012 (4:13 PM).
Katamari's Avatar
Katamari Katamari is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,580
I don't even like 3v3 and rotation battles, I can't even begin to imagine 6v6. I mean that's your whole entire team out there, right there, front and center. Absolutely no element of surprise.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19    
Old November 17th, 2012 (10:30 PM).
Brendino's Avatar
Brendino Brendino is offline
ModeratorCS
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seven Bridges Road
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 6,476
I really hope they don't add 6 vs. 6 battles in the future, as I felt that Triple Battles already cross the line a bit (I'm a little more lenient towards Rotation Battles, but feel that something like this would we better suited for a Battle Frontier like situation). Personally, I'm not even a fan of 2 vs. 2 battles, so I think that 6 vs. 6 battles would just get needlessly complicated and have very little appeal.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20    
Old November 18th, 2012 (4:45 AM).
von Weltschmerz von Weltschmerz is offline
the first born unicorn
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 135
Double Battle are fine enough, thank. Triple battles were like that movie sequel of a good movie that is just plain awful because they copied the first one exactly, expecting that, if it was so successful, that a similar sequel would be. And well... that's just not that case. Six on Six would be like making a threequel o.o It serves no real purpose, it adds no real value to the game... It makes you think about strategy... A LITTLE... but in the story line yuo don't need a whole lotta that.
__________________
Being wrong isn't "bad", failing to admit that you are, is.
Reply With Quote
  #21    
Old November 18th, 2012 (7:21 AM).
Sverige's Avatar
Sverige Sverige is offline
#justiceforbionic 11.11.13
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 516
As long as they aren't rotational.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22    
Old November 18th, 2012 (10:26 AM).
Kahisys's Avatar
Kahisys Kahisys is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: France
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Lonely
Posts: 12
6 vs 6's way too much. It's already quite a mess with 3 vs 3, and I really don't imagine more Pokemon into a single battle.
__________________
My beloved team !
Reply With Quote
  #23    
Old November 18th, 2012 (11:18 AM).
Treecko's Avatar
Treecko Treecko is offline
#teamcap
Gold Tier
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: St.Louis,Missouri
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Nature: Modest
Posts: 5,761
Send a message via Skype™ to Treecko
I don't think a 6v6 battle could fit on the screen that well. It would end up looking too messy. 3 v 3 is already pretty complicated and so 6 vs 6 would be even more hectic.
__________________
United we stand, divided we fall.
Reply With Quote
  #24    
Old November 18th, 2012 (11:32 AM).
Uh-Oh, Ho-Oh!'s Avatar
Uh-Oh, Ho-Oh! Uh-Oh, Ho-Oh! is offline
Silver Tier
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York City
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,576
No way. It would be way too crowded and complicated. I think that 3 on 3 is the most that should be done.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #25    
Old November 18th, 2012 (11:56 AM).
IcyIce's Avatar
IcyIce IcyIce is offline
Fictional Writer.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tennessee
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Posts: 3,607
I don't like the idea about 6 on 6. 3 on 3 are annoying enough. Don't think I'd lke 6 on 6 at all. But I do love 2 on 2.
__________________
Pokemon Trainer Academy RP: Characters and Pokemon.
Dalex Yukashi: Treecko, Red Fletchling, Froakie, Rufflet,
Ariane Dracon: Noibat and Togepi

DTIS 2:
Alex Hunt: Dratini
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:31 PM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2016.