The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Off-Topic Discussions > Discussions & Debates
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices

Discussions & Debates The place to go for slightly more in-depth topics. Discussions and debates about the world, current events, ideas, news, and more.


Reply
Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.  
Thread Tools
  #151    
Old February 5th, 2013, 10:00 AM
Esper's Avatar
Esper
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renpuu View Post
One thousand gun deaths is surprisingly low to the vast amount of other killer diseases and other factors such as suicide. Suicide is higher than murder in the US.
Most of the gun violence is due to gang violence.
These special "shootings" are only a small blip in society compared to the vast amount of other problems facing the world.
It's gone past 1500 since I posted last. Just pointing this out.

And compared to many other causes of death, yes, guns aren't "as deadly" but they are still deadly (meaning still a problem that we can try to solve while still acknowledging other serious problem and simultaneously dealing with those) and deadly in different ways. There's no such thing as drive-by heart disease, for instance. There aren't typically "warning signs" like there are with diseases and suicide. (Well, you could say that an overabundance of guns is a warning sign, I suppose.) That makes gun deaths something extra dangerous because they are so sudden.
__________________

deviantart blog pair
Reply With Quote
  #152    
Old February 6th, 2013, 09:54 AM
shenanigans's Avatar
shenanigans
hear me roar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester
Gender: Male
Whooooops forgot to merge this one into the main gun thread. I'll get on that now.
__________________
#TMAFD
Reply With Quote
  #153    
Old February 6th, 2013, 02:20 PM
Esper's Avatar
Esper
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Adding to our lengthy thread is this sad story of a 3 year old boy who died after playing with a pink gun he thought was a toy. The pink gun (presumably it's color is why it was mistaken for a toy) accidentally discharged while the boy and his sister were playing with it. The parents were not home and apparently grandparents were in the next room. People said they would prefer people kept their guns in lock boxes, or "at least have them out of the reach of children."

Inevitably responses from the internet about this have been heated. Some say it proves that assault weapons bans would not do anything to stop things like this. Others rightly point out that assault weapons bans are intended to stop mass shootings and that the US is a crazy, crazy place for not having laws about how you store your guns.
__________________

deviantart blog pair
Reply With Quote
  #154    
Old February 6th, 2013, 03:47 PM
Shiny Celebi
Donator Tier 3
Community Supporter Tier 3
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Internet
Its a parent's responsibility to keep guns out of reach of children and teach them that they aren't toys, yes the gun shouldve been locked away. When you have children, you have the responsibility of making sure they are safe in the home and have no access to dangerous objects. Gun laws are not going to keep this from happening if people don't have the responiblity to keep them away from the children.
__________________
BMGf Ever Grande City
Reply With Quote
  #155    
Old February 6th, 2013, 08:11 PM
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X
Oops
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarf View Post
Adding to our lengthy thread is this sad story of a 3 year old boy who died after playing with a pink gun he thought was a toy. The pink gun (presumably it's color is why it was mistaken for a toy) accidentally discharged while the boy and his sister were playing with it. The parents were not home and apparently grandparents were in the next room. People said they would prefer people kept their guns in lock boxes, or "at least have them out of the reach of children."

Inevitably responses from the internet about this have been heated. Some say it proves that assault weapons bans would not do anything to stop things like this. Others rightly point out that assault weapons bans are intended to stop mass shootings and that the US is a crazy, crazy place for not having laws about how you store your guns.
Or, even better - Stop making the guns look like toys. By this I mean stop painting them in bright, attractive, colors.

Anyway, personalized guns would solve a lot of issues. Basically, a personalized gun is a gun that will only fire for it's owner. Biometrics are cheap and reliable enough for them to be fitted to most guns, and locking the use of the gun to its owner would prevent a lot of cases like this.

Really, this solves more then this - It puts in place a way to prevent those guns from falling into criminals hands. Given that people will resale guns, gun manufactures would have to have systems in place to reset the security features on the guns. They would use this system to track ownership of that gun. With this, if a gun is used in a crime and recovered then the police would easily know the person who used it, and if applicable, the person who sold it to the criminal. And really, given that it's a crime for a person to, knowingly or unknowingly, purchase stolen items it really should be a crime for a person to, knowingly or unknowingly, sell a gun to a person who intends to use it for crime.

The technologies for personalized guns are in existance - fingerprint scanners and voice recognition are the basics although more sophisticated systems could be used.
__________________
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape

Last edited by Mr. X; February 6th, 2013 at 11:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #156    
Old February 6th, 2013, 08:22 PM
CarcharOdin's Avatar
CarcharOdin
Master of The Universe
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Monterey, California, USA
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. X View Post
Anyway, personalized guns would solve a lot of issues. Basically, a personalized gun is a gun that will only fire for it's owner. Biometrics are cheap and reliable enough for them to be fitted to most guns, and locking the use of the gun to its owner would prevent a lot of cases like this.

Really, this solves more then this - It puts in place a way to prevent those guns from falling into criminals hands. Given that people will resale guns, gun manufactures would have to have systems in place to reset the security features on the guns. With this, if a gun is used in a crime and recovered then the police would easily know the person who used it, and if applicable, the person who sold it to the criminal. And really, given that it's a crime for a person to, knowingly or unknowingly, purchase stolen items it really should be a crime for a person to, knowingly or unknowingly, sell a gun to a person who intends to use it for crime.

The technologies for personalized guns are in existence - fingerprint scanners and voice recognition are the basics although more sophisticated systems could be used.
This is perhaps one of the most agreeable gun control measures I have ever seen. Reminds me of the guns used in License to Kill and Skyfall where the gun would only fire if it was in the Bond's hands. They need to get on this.
__________________
CarcharOdin gets high on life to forget about drugs.
Reply With Quote
  #157    
Old February 6th, 2013, 11:30 PM
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X
Oops
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarcharOdin View Post
This is perhaps one of the most agreeable gun control measures I have ever seen. Reminds me of the guns used in License to Kill and Skyfall where the gun would only fire if it was in the Bond's hands. They need to get on this.
It was attempted in the past. The technology was more expensive back then. This, coupled with the NRA saying that personalized guns were a attempt to reduce a persons second amendment rights, ment that nothing ever got beyond the "Hey, this sounds like a good idea!" phrase.
__________________
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape
Reply With Quote
  #158    
Old February 7th, 2013, 02:42 PM
Pinkie-Dawn's Avatar
Pinkie-Dawn
I Am Become Death
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
How exactly can personalized guns abridge second amendment rights? They would still have their guns in their arms.
__________________
Credit goes to grundo80 from imgur for the gif
Reply With Quote
  #159    
Old February 7th, 2013, 05:18 PM
Shiny Celebi
Donator Tier 3
Community Supporter Tier 3
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Internet
I think because it prevents other people except the owner from using it. Like say the owner was away, and someone who lived with them wouldnt be able to use it for self defense if someone was attemping to hurt them, at least I think that's what they mean.
__________________
BMGf Ever Grande City
Reply With Quote
  #160    
Old February 8th, 2013, 04:52 AM
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X
Oops
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiny Celebi View Post
I think because it prevents other people except the owner from using it. Like say the owner was away, and someone who lived with them wouldnt be able to use it for self defense if someone was attemping to hurt them, at least I think that's what they mean.
The security measures could easily be designed to allow for multiple users though.

The owner of the gun would be the person who determines just who can use the gun.

Still - ensuring that only the owner of the gun is the only person able to use that gun does nothing to infringe upon their rights.
__________________
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape

Last edited by Mr. X; February 8th, 2013 at 05:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #161    
Old February 9th, 2013, 11:11 PM
Crux's Avatar
Crux
Evermore
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 青い世界
Age: 18
Gender: Male
Nature: Relaxed
Send a message via Skype™ to Crux
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
__________________





W o r d p l o y
{Never and Forever}

Tees | Coming Soon | Coming Soon
Reply With Quote
  #162    
Old February 10th, 2013, 07:49 AM
Mr. X's Avatar
Mr. X
Oops
Community Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Age: 21
Gender: Male
Nature: Quiet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo View Post
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Personalized guns don't take away a persons rights.

If they want a gun, they have to buy their own - Really, personalized guns would enforce their rights.

Besides - We've already given up rights for safety. Especially when it comes to the second amendment. The law against felons owning weapons is against the second amendment.
__________________
Follower of Carlinism since 2008.

Come play Runescape
Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.