The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Pokémon Discussions > Pokémon General
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read

Notices

Pokémon General Theories, experiences and other discussions regarding the Pokémon franchise that can't be covered in any of the other boards.
Feel like talking about Pokémon manga? Check this out! Want to discuss and share Pokémon music and videos? Click here!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1    
Old January 30th, 2013, 05:12 PM
aenima1
Unhatched Egg
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Well anyway I was playing some black version and what not casually walked into a pokemon center and as my team were being healed, I noticed why do they have to be hurt in the first place. I know 1 of the pokemon traditions for many years were to battle and fight against one another but is it right? At the expense of the pokemon, people in the pokemon world are gaining satisfaction in putting them in an "no holds barred" against one another.

Think about the powers pokemon have? They are incredible at that! and could possibly kill a human so easily (team rocket must be damn lucky) . What effects does this have on the pokemon though? Yes you could say that it is awesome for them, and that they should level and evolve as Darwin has proved it to be, but in a time where survival is not a problem, fighting is the least needed thing for these types of "animals".

So anyway my real question is wouldn't their be Pokemon rights groups who are fighting for the freedom of Pokemon all around the Pokemon world?
Reply With Quote
  #2    
Old February 2nd, 2013, 10:33 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick
Winter Love
Community Supporter Tier 5
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Nature: Sassy
Do Pokemon even need a Pokemon rights group? They're smart enough to form their own if they felt the need to, but they apparently are fine with things the way they are (Mewtwo aside, he seems to be the only one angsty enough to want to form said group). Pokemon don't have 1:1 needs or values that humans have, much like animals. Plus, they get to live more or less the way they want, so I don't feel like they'd really need our intervention.

The difference between Pokemon and animals in this situation is that an animal tends to only act instinctively. A Pokemon will actually think things out, unless it has a brash personality. If they really felt like some kind of danger was escalating, they'd put two and two together and just leave the area. They don't have to worry about looking for a new household or not having the means to move right away, they live off the land.

In a way, you'd think it would be sort of dangerous to have the beasts around that have the instincts of animals, but the intellgence of at least barely functioning humans (Slowpoke, for example, and probably at best geniuses, but this is probably reserved for Pokemon like Alakazam and Dragonite). But by and large, they seem to be either benevolent, or removed from humans enough to not really care to mess with us as long as we give them the same kind of respect. They have better things to do with their time, just like most of us iRL don't spend all day thinking about animals, unless that's your profession.

At the end of the day, humans, monsters, and animals all need to be treated with respect and just leave each other alone most of the time. Even animals aren't nearly as defenseless as the picture those animal shelter commercials paint. Most of that came from human intervention and mistreatment to begin with. The difference is that there are some animals that can't function too well without humans anymore, such a dogs. Pokemon seem like they could really live off in their own little world/paradise forever and be okay. However, I'm sure some of them would miss humans, like I'm sure some of us would miss them if we just completely separated like that.

So in short, no, a Pokemon rights group isn't necessary, because they're absolutely capable of handling everything, barring surprise attacks, themselves. Frankly, we can't handle surprise attacks either. I think some of us just want to feel like they need us in the same way we want to feel like animals need us. It's sort of a selfish but human way of thinking.

As far why Pokemon willingly battle for humans, that's merely an obedience thing. Pokemon don't do evil things, they just obey their commands, as Ekans put it in a very early episode of Pokemon. Though even that's debatable as Meowth didn't seem to agree. But, like humans, that probably depends on upbringing. Meowth felt like he was dealt a bad hand in life, so it probably warped his judgment, but maybe that's his fault for wanting to be more human. I could go on and on.

Interesting that I'm the only one to reply to this topic. :P I guess it's hard to imagine considering the games never bring the idea up at all. That, and the trainer games are such a decidedly human perspective on the entirety of the Pokemon world, and it's hard for us to relate to anything that isn't also human.
__________________

Other Stuff That's Totally Uncool and Not Worth Your Time!

Reply With Quote
Reply
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25



All times are UTC -8. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.