The PokéCommunity Forums  

Go Back   The PokéCommunity Forums > Pokémon Discussions > Pokémon General
Sign Up Rules/FAQ Live Battle Blogs Mark Forums Read


Pokémon General Theories, experiences and other discussions regarding the Pokémon franchise that can't be covered in any of the other boards.
Feel like talking about Pokémon manga? Check this out! Want to discuss and share Pokémon music and videos? Click here!

Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.  
Thread Tools
Old December 13th, 2013, 02:45 PM
WatermelonTango's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2013
Gender: Male
A lot of possible new typings I can think of seem a little bit forced. Sound could be cool but it would be hard to decide what is good or bad against it. I'm sure that at some point way down the line they'll come up with a new typing and shock people like what they did with the fairy typing, but I'm pretty comfortable with the way things are now.
Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2013, 12:57 AM
PlatinumDude's Avatar
Community Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Nature: Hasty
Send a message via Yahoo to PlatinumDude Send a message via Skype™ to PlatinumDude
The only time I'd like to see a new type introduced is if the type can balance out Ghost because Ghost got buffed big-time this gen.

Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2013, 06:29 PM
Alex's Avatar
TheRose, Pt
Community Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Colorado
Age: 16
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via Skype™ to Alex
I'd love to see a Gas-type introduced and the Bird-type brought back. That would make my day! :D

I did my time and I want out
So effusive – fade – it doesn’t cut
The soul is not so vibrant
The reckoning, the sickening
Packaging subversion
Pseudo–sacrosanct perversion
Reply With Quote
Old December 23rd, 2013, 08:56 PM
Boilurn's Avatar
Scald Pokémon
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Route 49
Nature: Mild
Some people do want to see more types, however with so many types already (Including the new Fairy-type) adding more types would probably make Pokemon a little too complicated. 18 types is good enough already.
Boilurn, the Scald Pokemon and the evolved form of Hottle. It can burn the holder by the lightest of touches when it boils. It can boil 3 gallons of water in one minute.
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2014, 11:17 AM
dydd90's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Italy
Gender: Male
Mmmm....I think there are a lot of types. They are enough
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2014, 04:20 PM
Bestintheworld's Avatar
Capo de tutti capo
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New York
Gender: Male
Nature: Naughty
I don't think there any good types left, they pretty much got everything covered. Anything else you come up with would prolly overlap an existing group making it pointless
3ds FC: 4742-6969-1716
White 2 FC: 0133-4568-1465
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2014, 06:33 PM
Otter Mii-kun's Avatar
Otter Mii-kun
Molly, you're cute ;)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 810, Michigan
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Considering it took so long to introduce a new type since the last expansion (Generation II), I don't think there will be any more new types, at least not for a very long time.
However, if there ever comes yet another new type in the future, I'd like to see it not have an immunity (all of the post Gen I 'expansion' types (Steel, Dark, and Fairy) have one immunity each.) I honesty wasn't expecting Fairy to even have an immunity.
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2014, 09:45 PM
Lost Lore's Avatar
Lost Lore
From the Shadows
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mt. Coronet
Age: 21
Gender: Female
Nature: Sassy
I'd only want to see more new types if it's in the interest of balance. For example, if Ice resisted it, since Ice is the only type left in need of a serious defensive buff. (I mean, seriously, what's up with it only resisting Ice? Can't it resist like... Water, or something, at least?)

Granted, I don't think it'll be anytime soon, if they do decide to add any more. And they'd better not nerf my precious Dark-type any more than they already have... I'll never forgive those darn Fairies, I was just fine with them until that.
Current mono-type: Psychic
Game: Emerald (4/8)

Regions cleared in the almighty Dark mono-type: Johto | Hoenn | Sinnoh | Unova

Icon credits.
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2014, 10:27 PM
Join Date: Jun 2010
Nature: Hasty
Send a message via Skype™ to Khrysta
I don't buy into the "They only introduce a new type to balance out the game play" schtick because that's hardly true. If it were true Fairy would have appeared sooner than it did, or they would have made less powerful dragons, not that the introduction of Fairy Type did anything for balance other than throw it a little further from being balanced.

Steel got a change, completely unrelated to fairy type addition and that was a balance update to give it a not so tanky tank feel. Fighting and Dark didn't need new weaknesses, Bug didn't need to be resisted by another type. There wasn't much balance brought in.

With the rant out of the way, I'd like for Sound to become an actual type. Unlike Powder, Punching, Aura, and Biting, Sound is more than just a descriptive grouping for a set of attacks and deserves its own recognition as a type. It already has an ability that nullifies it similar to other types.

Sound is really all I'd like to see added in right now as the other types: Cosmic, Astral, Holy, Light, ect. ...They just don't really fit in. They'd be good for RPGs in general and any Pet collection/Monster Taming games that aren't Pokemon.
Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2014, 04:13 AM
Ashleyx's Avatar
I see food, I eat it.
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Singapore
Gender: Female
Nature: Jolly
If new type comes out, there's surely have some pokemon with three types.
IGN: Ashley | FC: 5343-9117-2186
Safari type: Poison

Native Vivillon:
Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2014, 04:36 AM
adventure's Avatar
satellite physician
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 瑞典
Gender: Female
Nature: Naive
Originally Posted by LoudSilence View Post
I think we've got enough new types, it'd just be cooler to see some more interesting dual-typings. Imagine opposite types being stuck together (Fire/Water, Grass/Fire, Dark/Fairy, etc.)? That would be really cool!

I think the only dual-type I never want to see again is Fire/ they got away with THREE starters like that I'll never know!
I agree with this post. New dual types can be an interesting way of making cool new pokémon. If some typings, Fire/water or something, would be "too strong", they could make the pokémon not an overly strong species.

Personally I was fine before we added Dark and Steel even, haha, because Steel could have fallen into the Rock type somehow, like with Rhyhorn. And Dark could have fallen into Psychic or ghost depending on what the pokémon was like.

So I'm not going to fight for yet another type to be added ;) Even though I think it was a fun thing that we got fairies. I think of that type as "fairytale" pokémon, I guess. I've heard better explanations for it though.

As some have said, more types would only be to balance the competitive gameplay.
Hoenn Grand Festival
moderator of : Pokémon General
and of the : Roleplay Corner
paired with : abnegation
roleplay: CLOUD v2.0
Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2014, 02:17 PM
Bruce Banner's Avatar
Bruce Banner
don't fly away
Community Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kentucky
Gender: Male
Nature: Adamant
Send a message via Skype™ to Bruce Banner
No, I think adding more types will make the metagame even more complicated. that's not necessarily a bad thing for veterans, but for newbies it would suuuck. I think that there should be a more diverse pool of dual types rather than new types.
Sisters | Brother | Pairs
Reply With Quote
Quick Reply

Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Minimum Characters Per Post: 25

All times are UTC -8. The time now is 07:42 AM.

Style by Nymphadora, artwork by Sa-Dui.
Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity™,
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2014 The PokéCommunity / Poké
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.