I can't believe some of the comments I'm reading. This guy stopped a group of attackers from possibly killing two people and you're saying he shouldn't have done it? Comments like that make me sick. There's nothing I agree with more than the use of non-lethal force to stop potentially lethal actions.
"Six or seven guys were beating up two other guys," Krulos said, adding he heard "loud, aggressive noises." One victim was thrown to the ground and kicked in the ribs. "Two other guys were wrestling with each other but not in a playful way -- and people were screaming."
Let me pose this question, then: what would have happened there if he hadn't intervened? Can you guarantee those two would still have been alive today?