View Full Version : The Video Game Character Debate: Round 6 - Dragons and MUTANTS!

Miss Doronjo
July 15th, 2013, 7:40 AM
The Character Debates

So, here's the deal; each week, two (or possibly more) characters will be introduced. Your job is to simply pick one between them! Or in other words, which one of the character do you like the best, and why? I also encourage you to be a little creative in your answers, like, could X character beat Y character in a fight? Hm.

Now then, without further ado, Round 1 will introduce two of the most familiar characters in the video game franchise:


Yes, it's Mario vs Sonic the HedgeHog.

Mario from Mario Bros. is probably the most (if not one of the most) well known video game characters there is, as he stars in his Super Mario Bros. Games, collecting Power ups and storming castles in order to save Princess Peach from Bowser, and save the Mushroom Kingdom. He also stars in a variety of Mario sports games, like Mario Tennis, Mario Golf, Mario Hoops 3 on 3, etc. The most notable thing about Mario is his amazing jumping ability! He can double jump, triple jump, side jump, long jump, wall jump, spin jump, and the jumping list goes on!

Sonic the Hedgehog is made form Sega, in which he can run as fast as the Speed of Sound. He stars in his Sonic the Hedgehog games where he races through levels, in order to defeat Dr. Robotnik (aka Eggman) and his robot minions, to save the animals in his world. Soon, the Chaos Emeralds were introduced, and Sonic and his friends, Knuckles, Tails, etc. must collect them all before they fall in the wrong hands, essentially.

So! From all that, and from all on what you know about these two characters, do you prefer Mario, or Sonic?

July 15th, 2013, 8:04 AM
I've never really enjoyed Mario games except the sports titles and Mario Kart. Plus he doesn't look as cool as Sonic and is probably one of my least favourite characters of his own series.

Sonic on the other hand is probably my second favourite character from the Sonic series and even though the Sonic games are a bit hit and miss these days, I've still enjoyed them heaps more than the Mario series.

Plus Speed > Jumping. So yeah Sonic is an easy choice for me in this round.

July 15th, 2013, 8:47 AM
I'm gonna have to go with Sonic. See, Sonic is known for being fast, whereas Mario doesn't really have any "superpower", so to speak. With Mario, he is average in terms of his ability, and doesn't really excel in many categories. Sonic actually has specific attributes and some things that he isn't that good at, making him a more interesting character already.

Sonic runs at the speed of sound, making him faster than anything else (Shadow being debatable) to live. Mario, on the other hand, can jump slightly higher than the average human, which isn't something you can brag about. Mario has to use power-ups to alter himself and give him some sort of power, however this doesn't come down to the actual character, he can't do any of this himself. Sonic's speed is natural to him, and he can use his speed as an advantage. For example, if his is running at his full speed, this will make him stronger as he is able to generate power behind whatever he uses to "hit" something with. So Sonic can actually utilize his speed and do other things with it.

Furthermore, Sonic looks a lot better generally. Yes, Mario has his trademark clothes and hat, but it isn't anything that special. The actual design of Sonic is more aesthetically pleasing than that of Mario. Mario is simply a human, there is nothing special about that. Sonic is a blue, talking hedgehog with a nice look to him. Mario is a plumber in a red outfit. Do I need say more? Okay, maybe, but you get my point, I will just keep talking about how Sonic looks better than Mario.

July 15th, 2013, 9:06 AM
Easy. I'm not gonna go debating who'd win in a fight because that would put me in the fanfic territory.

Games-wise; Not even close, Mario. Mario games have always been masterpieces of game design, and they are still kings of the platformer genre, 3D or 2D. Whether it comes to clever level design, satisfactory controls or great production value, Mario always has it. In contrast to Sonic, where as he has great games, they are only a few and far between. Most of his games, mainly after the genesis era until the end of this gen, Sonic games suffered from sheer mediocrity. After Sonic 3 and Knuckles it hasn't been until Sonic Colors that we have got another good Sonic game, and even the best Sonic games can't compare with the best of Mario.

Design-wise; Easy as well, Mario. Yes, yes, it's all preferences, but let's look at it this way. Regardless of how dated his design is, Mario has kept going for more than 20 years with the same simplistic design he always had with minor changes (mainly the transition to 3D CG). Why is that? Because his design is simple, and doesn't focus on one demographic. Basically, his design appeals to everyone the same way Micky Mouse does. It's not tacky, it's not cool, it's not hip, it's just simple, and depends on the person, cute (in a weird way) and most importantly effective. His design is very iconic, not only to video games, but it's actually culturally iconic.
Sonic, on the other hand, always focused on one demographic - pre-teens (and teens since Sonic Adventure). While it works for that particular demographic, it's not very effective everywhere else. Sonic has always been portrayed as cool and it's been left at that, and because of that Sonic's popularity fell immensely after the thought that weirdly colored mascot animal are cool died off. Hence, while Mario's design is dated, Sonic's is EXTREMELY dated, and it really shows.

Character-wise; I'll keep it short. Mario's personality, or lack thereof, is much more preferable than "EXTREME BRO IM COOL" blue hedgehog.

Ability-wise; Keeping it short again. Mario's abilities were MADE for the game design. Sonic's abilities have always been a gimmick until Colors.

Overall; Mario in every way

Now to clear things off, I love Sonic. :P

Atomic Pirate
July 16th, 2013, 10:30 AM
Easily Mario. Based on the games, Mario is far better than Sonic, due to the fact that most of the Sonic games aren't worth playing. Plus, the Mario fanbase is mostly normal. The Sonic fanbase, well, deserves it's infamy.

Based on design, I'd also say Mario. Sonic's design tries too hard to be "cool" and "extreme" whereas Mario's design is very simple and harkens back to the cartoon characters of old. Whereas Sonic looks like he's trying to be an "XTREME KOOL ANIMUU KARAKTER", Mario's design looks classy and natural.

July 16th, 2013, 11:45 AM
Plus, the Mario fanbase is mostly normal. The Sonic fanbase, well, deserves it's infamy.

Please don't remind me of those people. I was one of them when I was younger and I got scarred for life.

I'd say Mario is preferred. Sonic is okay, but he's had such a rough lifetime through horrible games and characters.

Mario is just more simple. Sure, his games have been lacking innovation, but they still are fun to play occasionally. (Although 3D world sucked imo.)

Wings Don't Cry
July 16th, 2013, 1:46 PM
I'm with Spinosaurus on this one, not gonna decide who's going to win in a fight, although Sonic does help a lot more than Mario in Subspace.

I'm going to side with Mario on this one just because he has a mustache that looks like a pair of wings and a princess who bakes cakes for him, also his games tend to be a lot more fun.

July 17th, 2013, 4:59 AM
I'm going to have to go with Sonic the Hedgehog. It's not that I don't love Mario games; I do, it's just that Mario's not as an interesting character as Sonic. I mean yeah sure Mario's great, but Nintendo doesn't really give me a reason to like him as a character. He really doesn't have any personality and that's fine but he just kind of seems really boring and monotonous. Sure, I like Mario, but I like him in the same way that every person on the planet likes him... because he's iconic.
Even though he's not the perfect character, Sonic is actually given a bit of personality. I also just really like Sonic's more modern design, much more than I like the look of Mario.
So while I like both characters I think I like Sonic just a little bit more.

July 17th, 2013, 7:27 AM
For me, it's going to be Mario, for a few reasons. First off, like a bunch have stated previously, Mario is more of a simple, kind, humble character that is much more lovable from a personality standpoint, while Sonic is over confident and has the idea that he's better than everyone else. From that perspective, Mario wins.

Another reason is that Mario's abilities in his games, even if a bit lackluster, were far more resourceful than Sonic's super-speed power. Although Mario doesn't have any superhuman ability or skill such as the one Sonic possesses, he still is just as good a hero and more modest at that. Two for Mario, zero for the hedgehog.

Finally, I'd like to say that from the character design standpoint, Sonic would win without question. I mean, at first glance, it's a sharp looking blue hedgehog with bright red shoes and the ability to go extremely fast, while Mario is a chubby plummer with the ability to jump on things and flaunt his mustache. Somehow, however, Nintendo has taken that chubby plummer and turn it into a symbol of video gaming itself, which should automatically win it the category.

So, to sum it up, Mario is a superior video game character. I do like Sonic more, and quite a bit of occasions I'd take a game of his rather than Mario, but Mario wins in this debate.

July 17th, 2013, 9:14 AM
although Sonic does help a lot more than Mario in Subspace.

Well, if you wanna put it that way, Sonic is technically the better character in Brawl. But, that's not saying much, as Mario is one of the worst characters and Sonic is still very mediocre. :P

I'm still sad about Mario in Brawl. Kinda funny how he kept getting worse and worse each game. If only we had Dr. Mario back in his full glory.

July 18th, 2013, 9:33 PM
Honestly, I've always preffered Mario, if only because he can do everything! Whereas Sonic has a niche as a speed boosting choice scarved revenge killer, Mario has always been the Sashed Nasty Plot (mushroom) Sweeper I've always wanted. He's a jack of all trades, and, while he would lose in an all-out fight against sonic, this is because sonic is great at one thing, while Mario is mildly good at everything, except dodging slow bullets.

If I may make a recommendation for next week's post, can we see Samus (Metroid Prime's Samus, not that abomination Other M's edition) vs. FemShep or another strong female heroine? Maybe BloodRaine or something along those lines?

July 19th, 2013, 11:37 AM
For me im sorta in the between. Super mario bros 3 was one of the first video games I played. (And everyone can agree that game is god-tier)

I was introduced to sonic only much later. I cant realy remember what was the first sonic game I played. (Could have been Heroes...oh god...) Although I remember reading a realy old sonic comic countles times. (issue #1 of the archie comics I guess) For some odd reason I then got sonic Mega Collection Plus on ps2 and Sonic adventure DX on PC at sometime in 200x. And I was immediatly hooked.

Funny thing is I have newer liked mario games as everyone else seemed (well other than SMB3 and new super mario bros ds and mario 64 ds). I guess they newer felt like my thing?
I dunno even though I started with nintendo it newer became my dominating game company in my game taste. The one nintendo series I could say is my favourite is metroid...and I guess that speaks alot about me.

Also I have always enjoyed Sonic-games soundtrack more. I dont say mario games dont have a great soundtrack....I just like sonics more. And for me a good soundtrack can save a mediocre game.

And now we get to the quality of the francises... I know sonic has suffered from many terrible and mediocre games... usualy in 3d. And Mario games have usualy worked out fine.
I have always thought the reason for this. my opinion is that mario has always stayed to its roots. It has newer tried anything completely different...for the most part. (im talking about the majority of mario games being same... atleast they feel identical for me)
Whereas sonic has had its fare share of completely different titles. Some that worked...and others that flopped.

I know this sounds realy biased. And the more I look into my memory I realise that mario games realy do have some realy great variety. (mario rpg, mario kart etc) But the bottom line is I newer grew onto mario the same way as other titles (Rayman, castlevania, Megaman even sonic) and I dont have much of that nostalgia many others have. So I cant call myself a fan of mario games.

And then theres the point of fandom...oh god the fans. I personaly dont judge a game by its fandom. But the fandom does say something about itself and the game. (mainly what kind of people it atracts) I realy dont care about the fan side of things... Its great to know that there are people who like same things as me, but I newer trie to intergrate myself into one specific fandom. (I hope this makes sense)

And my final verdict... I guess I like sonic more than mario but I can kinda see why someone likes him so much...

Wings Don't Cry
July 20th, 2013, 11:30 PM
Well, if you wanna put it that way, Sonic is technically the better character in Brawl. But, that's not saying much, as Mario is one of the worst characters and Sonic is still very mediocre. :P

I'm still sad about Mario in Brawl. Kinda funny how he kept getting worse and worse each game. If only we had Dr. Mario back in his full glory.

I was kind of referring to the cut scenes and not actual game play. Mario kind of gets his ass handed to him by just about every single character he encounters assuming you chose Kirby at the start of the game. Sonic on the other hand only has one cut scene which is just him successfully attacking that one guy who managed to take out everyone in an instant.

Miss Doronjo
July 22nd, 2013, 6:14 AM
Thanks for participating in Round 1! Are you guys ready for Round 2? Because here are the contestants:


King Bowser vs King K.Rool. Two Kings; two evil kings.

King Bowser is the main antagonist from the Super Mario Games - he captures princess peach in order to try and rule the mushroom kingdom. He did many other things too like capture Mario and Luigi one time, and even tried to make his own galaxy. Of course, he's been unsuccessful so far, but, let's root for him! He can breathe fire, teleport, create shockwaves, and grow x2 his size, which sort of differs from each Mario game.

King K. Rool is the main antagonist from the Donkey Kong country games. K. Rool and his gang of minions, the Kremling Krew, came to Donkey Kong Island one stormy night with the intention to steal Donkey Kong's fabled Banana Hoard. King K. Rool sent his Kremling minions to steal the precious bananas. He failed, but tried other things like K. Rool manages to kidnap Donkey Kong and speed him away to the home of the Kremlings, Crocodile Isle, and demands the Banana Hoard in return for Donkey Kong. Like Bowser, he's been unsuccessful, but, let's root for him too! He can throw his crown around like a boomerang, fire canonballs, and can even put on a mean boxing match. Yikes.

So! From all that, and from all on what you know about these two characters, do you prefer King Bowser, or King K.Rool?

July 24th, 2013, 8:37 PM
Well, they both have pretty crappy motives, but i'm going to go with Bowser. If only because I enjoy his boss fights way more than i enjoyed the fights against King K.Rool.

Unless of course the game in question is New Super Mario Bros for the DS.

Also, what the hell is King K.Rool going to do with Donkey Kong's banana horde anyway? Is it the secret to world domination or something?

Prediction for the next two characters: Megaman Vs Samus, Maybe?

July 24th, 2013, 11:50 PM
Ehh... I have to say Bowser since Ive newer met this King K.Rool. I havent played any Donkey Kong country games...so yeah... Thats my only reason. :D

Wings Don't Cry
July 25th, 2013, 3:23 AM
Neither one of them is very interesting to me but I'll choose Bowser just because I've played more games that feature him.

July 25th, 2013, 4:11 AM
Bowser because I've played games involving him, but also because his design is actually good whereas King K Rool looks like he was knocked up in five seconds.

Also don't we get scores for the previous round? I assumed you were going to total up the votes. :P

July 25th, 2013, 4:36 AM
Without a shadow of a doubt, Bowser for me. I've always been a huge fan of Bowser and he stands as one of my favorite game characters of all time. I like his attitude and approach on certain situations, the way he goes about being evil with complete commitment in doing so.

Generally, I like the character design. The colors used and the details clearly alert you that he is "up to no good", but also that you can recognize him as soon as you see him. I like the whole, big, muscular turtle idea behind him and the way they have managed to develop his features. His hair, spikes, spiky bands; you are warned straight away that Bowser is after Peach you.

July 25th, 2013, 6:42 PM
Bowser because he's the classic villain, especially in the final battle in Super Mario 3D land, it's better than just getting across some bridge, and pressing a button, in 3D Land you get chased and his castles are awesome and jerkish(I swear I wanted to chuck my DS when I played through new super mario bros ). And his final battle themes are awesome too. I never played any DK country games so yeah.

Infinite Latios
July 25th, 2013, 7:17 PM
I'm not that familiar with K. Rool, so I have to support Bowser. His goals? Take over a kingdom. K. Rool's goals? Depriving a bunch of monkeys of their bananas, apparently. There are other fruits out there, people. Next, Bowser has a regular victim. Princess Peach. He never hurts Peach, he's a very courteous Koopa when it comes to Peach. He has great taste. Peach is attractive. Donkey Kong is not, which makes me question K. Rool's taste in victims. Everyone knows the villain likes his victim, that's why he kidnaps her in the first place. Finally, Bowser has cooler underlings. I might not know K. Rool's subordinates, but I'm pretty sure that they don't beat snarky old turtles on brooms or turtle teenagers with hair in every color of the rainbow. There's just no beating Bowser.

July 26th, 2013, 5:33 AM
I'll go with K. Rool

First of all he is getting no love, and even though I havn't gotten that far in donkey kong country to fight him ( since the only time I can play it is at my grandmas house) I had a lot of fun playing DKC.

Also, and really the deciding factor here, he has better minions, well just one actually. The most diabolical thing in the world. It pissed of 10 year old me so many times, and sometimes still pisses me off just cause they are so annoying.


that dang BEE!!!!!

I think only this video can express my hatred for them. (There is some swearing)


Miss Doronjo
August 5th, 2013, 6:36 PM
Ready for Round 3? (at last.. teehee) The contestants this time:


Peach vs. Zelda. Two princesses from two different games.

Peach appears in the Super Mario games, where she is the Princess of Mushroom Kingdom; she's constantly kidnapped, except for that one time where she had to save Mario and Luigi. She can play sports, has a magical umbrella (that is super effective!) and can float for a period of time (which can be a small stable in the Smash bros. games!)

Zelda is from the Legend of Zelda games, and is a princess of Hyrule. She is the leader of the Sages, and wilds the Triforce of Wisdom. Along with her surprising swords skills, and her technique with arrows, she can also perform a wide variety of magic such as Din's Fire, Nayru's Love, and so on. She can also transform into Sheik, her alter ego.

So! Knowing this and other things you know from these two, do you prefer Peach.. or Zelda? Why?

Infinite Latios
August 5th, 2013, 6:47 PM
Hmm. Tough call. Peach is cuter, but Zelda is more able in the combat area. But Peach is more talented in everyday things... Hmm... I say... Draw.

August 5th, 2013, 10:23 PM
Zelda gets a lot more character development than Peach, and her games are better.

Still, Peach was brilliant in Paper Mario but then Zelda was Shiek.

Peach makes cake, but the cake is a lie.

I'll back Zelda, just because she seems more worth saving.

August 6th, 2013, 12:30 AM
Peach is...well, weak on her own :( While Zelda can kind of cover for herself with her abilities.

Also, Peach is almost always kidnapped, so she can't be left alone.

I'm going with Zelda.

August 6th, 2013, 1:25 AM
Easy decision. Zelda. She actualy does something and actualy governs her country. (a bit poorly but stilll) Also she can actualy fight back. Allaround zelda is more worth keeping around and thus saving. Peach is just...ehh...Captured way too many times...

August 6th, 2013, 7:06 PM
Zelda. Unquestionably. Peach gets kidnapped every other week, while Zelda is more than a damn damsel-in-distress.

While Peach is much prettier, and is absolutely adorable in paper form, where she has an actual assertive personality and is useful every now and then, it isn't enough. Sorry Peach, but it seems the Hylian Princess beats our beautiful fungus monarch.

Wings Don't Cry
August 7th, 2013, 2:33 PM
This is kind of a hard situation since in-game Peach has always been a useful character ever since Super Mario Bros 2, but is absolutely useless when the plot is involved. Zelda on the other hand can turn into a ninja. But I think I will have to go with Peach on this one since she's cuter and bakes cakes.

August 9th, 2013, 8:50 PM
Zelda simply because what everybody else is saying. PEACH GETS KIDNAPPED WAY TOO MANY DAMN TIMES. And Zelda has cool character development.

Miss Doronjo
August 14th, 2013, 9:51 AM
Now for round four! Here are our combatants:


Yesss, it's Fox vs. Samus.

Fox McCloud appears in the Star Fox games, where he is the leader of the Star Fox Team. He battles vigilant foes like the enemies from Venom, with their boss, Andross, to Starfox Adventures where he battles General Scales and the reincarnation of Andross, to Star Fox Assault where he faces the Aparoids, back to Star Fox Command, where he and his team battles the Angler. He rides the Arwing, where it can do barrel rolls, Speed Up, Brake, and throw bombs, and the Landmaster, where it can do really ridiculous damage with charge shots, and it can even float up, and charge through enemies.

Samus Aran is a bounty hunter who hunts the antagonistic Space Pirates and their leader, Ridley, along with the parasitic energy-draining organisms called Metroids. Her suit can carry a cannon, which can be charged to shoot an extra-powerful blast, a limited number of missiles, and various beams. Samus's suit can also collapse into a sphere, a mode called the Morph Ball, allowing her to roll through tight areas such as tunnels. The suit can scan objects to learn more about them, and has a grapple beam used to cross large distances, such as chasms.

So, knowing all this and more.. which one of these two do you prefer, and why?

By the way! Don't be afraid to send me character vs character requests via PM or VM! I'd be happy to take up on those as well. <3

August 14th, 2013, 10:14 AM
Well, I've never played any Star Fox or Metroid games...
But I'll go with Samus Aran because she gave me troubles in Smash Bros.
Fox McCloud never put up much of a fight :P

I've Come to Bargain
August 14th, 2013, 11:57 AM
Definitely Fox McCloud. He has amazing fighting skills, and he's a master when it comes to piloting vehicles like Arwing and Landmaster. This guy is an adventurer, and he is also the leader of the Star Fox crew. Star Fox were able to defeat many of their enemies under his leadership.

There's nothing wrong with Samus. She's been around much longer than Fox has, and she's a very popular character. However, in my opinion... she's just not as awesome as McCloud. xD

Apple Juice
August 14th, 2013, 1:33 PM
I really want to say Fox just because of my love for animals, but my vote goes to Samus Aran. Fox is definitely no easy foe, however. He's obviously an extremely skilled fighter and an expert at many other important skills that aid him in battle. His leadership and courage make him a formidable character that won the hearts of many in his game's audience. Due to Fox's abilities, his crew Star Fox were successful in obliterating countless enemies.

On the other hand, we have Samus, who impresses everyone in video gaming by being of the female gender. A huge twist that adds so much more to this fighting hunk of metal. The fact that under that gigantic, iron-clad brawling suit is a graceful girl makes Samus much more of an amazing heroine, and she already was before her gender was ever confirmed. Her signature attacks come from her suit, which allows her to manipulate and take down foes easily, as well as her Morph Ball form helping her get through narrow passage ways and the like.

As epic as both of these characters are, there can only be one that succeeds the other! :]

August 15th, 2013, 9:26 AM
Definetly Samus. After all she is a strong female protagonist. Also she wore the power armor before it was cool. And yeah. Ive played so many Metroud games that she is my favourite nintendo character...or atleast in the top 3.

Then again... Other M kinda shot samus in the leg charactervise atleast... Lets...lets not get into that again.

Also didnt fox have a mediocreish adventure a few years ago? (Starfox Adventures)

Miss Doronjo
August 21st, 2013, 8:16 AM
Time for Round Five! Here are our combatants:


Sam Fisher vs Solid Snake!

Sam Fisher is the protagonist of the Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell series of video games. He is a master in the art of stealth, trained in various espionage techniques and infiltration tactics, and an expert in urban warfare tactics as well as extensive knowledge about various other skills such as combat tactics, surveillance, computer hacking, explosives and the use of nearly any conventional weapon ambidextrously and is extremely proficient in fieldcraft. He is a highly-trained expert in the Israeli martial art of Krav Maga and specializes in Night Ops.

Snake is the protagonist of the Solid Snake series of video games. Snake is a combination of spy, special operations soldier, and FOXHOUND who is tasked with disarming and destroying the bipedal nuclear weapon-armed mecha Metal Gear. He acts alone, supported via radio by commanding officers and specialists.

So, knowing all this and more.. which one of these two do you prefer, and why?

By the way! Don't be afraid to send me character vs character requests via PM or VM! I'd be happy to take up on those as well. <3[/QUOTE]

August 21st, 2013, 8:31 AM
Easy choice. Solid Snake! Ive played the splinter cell games but I like snake still more. Other than his combat and sneaking abilities snake has a better supporting team. (imo)

August 21st, 2013, 8:38 AM
Somehow when I opened this thread I was like... Stealth? Probably Sam Fisher.

Anyway I preferred Sam over Snake. He just seemed much more... good at his job.

I've Come to Bargain
August 21st, 2013, 9:28 AM
Sam Fisher has done a lot of impressive things throughout his career, but I like Solid Snake more. He's saved the world on numerous occasions, took out Metal Gears with no trouble, and in many ways, he's a lot better than his clone brothers. He's an amazing hero, and he's one of the best characters to ever appear in a video game. He likes to hide in boxes too, by the way, which makes him even more awesome. n~n

August 21st, 2013, 1:28 PM
I've never played any Metal Gear games but from what I can gather, Snake has survived a lot. Plus he can hide in boxes so I'm tempted to give it to him.

Then again Sam Fisher has some beautiful night vision goggles and he can put people's heads through toilets.

Might have to call this one a tie. :P

August 21st, 2013, 1:33 PM
Easy choice, Solid snake, because I've never played splinter cell so I don't know what Sam fisher is like.

Apple Juice
August 21st, 2013, 2:36 PM
My pick this time around is Solid Snake. Besides having never played Splinter Cell, Snake had been a critically acclaimed character in video gaming, to the point where he was mentioned in discussions regarding the best character in the history of video games. If that's not enough, he's a top-level spy, special operations soldier, and he goes through with every act and mission alone; only contact with his allies through radio. Quite the courageous character!

Sam Fisher is an expert in espionage techniques and various infiltration tactics, as well as being well informed in topics like face-to-face combat, surveillance, and can use any two weapons ambidextrously. A well fit soldier and definitely a solid video game character, but I edge Snake over him for being the more established in his role.

Atomic Pirate
August 25th, 2013, 12:39 PM
Sam Fisher. Mainly because Metal Gear never really held my attention. Too many cutscenes and incoherent, convoluted plotlines.

September 10th, 2013, 5:33 PM
Time for Round Six! And yes, I'm going to do this on this account from now on~ Here are our combatants:


Crash Bandicoot vs Spyro the Dragon!

Crash Bandicoot is a heroic, agile and mutated marsupial (whatever that is). He can jump, double jump, swim, and spin vigiously to defeat his enemies. He stars in his own brand of Crash bandicoot games, from the first game where he had to save his girlfriend, to Crash Bandicoot: Warped where he had to defeat this evil Tiki from ruling the world. He also stars in his very own Crash Bandicoot Racing game!

Spyro is a young, energetic, purple Dragon. Spyro is portrayed as energetic and curious, with little regard for his own safety. He is also described as a courageous hero, despite his small size. Spyro is also known for his somewhat cocky attitude and stubbornness. Spyro's main attacks consist of ramming his opponents with his long horns or breathing fire at them. In later games, power-ups appear that let Spyro do much more powerful things like flying, spitting fire balls, and breathing ice.

So, knowing all this and more.. which one of these two do you prefer, and why?

By the way! Don't be afraid to send me character vs character requests via PM or VM! I'd be happy to take up on those as well. <3

September 10th, 2013, 6:08 PM
I've been waiting to see these two pop up on here :P

Both of these characters are great. I've played just about every game that they're in and have enjoyed all of them. They both have great abilities and are fun to play as.

Elemental Breath
Appears In Current Games

Bad Jump Height
No Jump Damage

Double Jump
Body Slam
Aku Aku
Racing Spinoffs

Dies Easier
Aku Aku Is Harder to Spawn Than Sparx

Even though they are both evenly matched, I have to say Spyro is better. The Spyro games are always fun to replay. The stories are better than Crash's games and the level designs are much more varied than the Crash series'. Another plus is that Spyro games take much longer to complete than Crash games. There are, however, two things that Crash has over Spyro: a better soundtrack and the racing spinoffs. CTR and CNK are both in my top five racing games of all time and the music from the games are very good to the ears.