Should they stop creating?

Do you thinnk there are too many Pokemon?

Do you think the creators should stop creating Pokemon after 4th generation?

Discuss. (and vote as well :D)

Look at how many species of animals there are in our world-Pokemon doesn't even have a fraction of that. They should keep going.

IDIC (anyone know what that means?)

I say leave it to destiny because I might gain some more favorite Pokemon overtime.

I also say leave it to destiny, but I would like to see them keep going. With the more pokemon that are released the more believable pokemon as a whole becomes.

...Maybe its only me that doesn't have a good short-term memory...

I think they should keep going on. Pokemon Fans would get terribly upset if Nintendo quit now and stopped making Pokemon.

They should keep on going, cause peeps need more of this stuff.

As long as their unique and creative I don't care if there's 1 million Generations.

There will always be a generation of kids ready to enjoy the world Pokemon, but I say leave to destiny, and see what the future holds

They should keep on going, but I've seen that nintendo has lost their originality in making new pokemon. Now they all seem to be plant or animal based, but back in the days of the original 151 pokemon, there was some originality. It's not everyday you just come up with pok?mon like likitung or tangela, not animal or bug, just original ideas. They should keep going though, to suit the needs of the new generation, but I just hope they will be more original. If this doesn't make since that's probably because i'm really tired. :tired:

I have to admit, sometimes when introduced to new pokemon, it may be radically different from the pokemon your used to (Ruby and Saphhire).

But right now, more should be created but with more orginal names, and originalty like the first 151, or even 251.

They should stop creating Pokemon. Infact, they should subtract Pokemon so we only have 50. Because 50 is easy to remember.

They should stop now. I'm worried about the appearence of future Pokemon

Pokemon can actually live on *without* new ones? ;p

They can start by making the new Pokemon generation games a good balance to puff the poor grass types and give grass some small speck of decency. Right now absolutely all grass types but the SP/SD/SB Venusaur are doomed by one single Pokemon who shall be turned to fried eggs before it can continue its rule of supremacy in the Pokemon metagame (its name is too evil to be mentioned by grass types...)

Make the obsolete Pokemon at least semi-useful, and just not make a Pokemon the complete overshadow of another (best example: Beautifly and Butterfree... as long as Butterfree exist, no one will ever even take a look at Beautifly... and as long as Breloom exist, no one will use Butterfree either. Sad part is that not like either of these 3 are really good either. Breloom is just decent...)

id say dont stop it completely, just slow down a bit. a few hundred new pokemon every game is a bit much. maybe add 10 or 20 every game.

Iveechan said:

They should stop creating Pokemon. Infact, they should subtract Pokemon so we only have 50. Because 50 is easy to remember.

Click to expand...

50 is little bit little, no offense.

I don't think we should dump any already-exist Pokemon.

Oh....BUT STOP IT NOW! MY BRAIN'S FULL =o=||||

I wouldn't mind a few more. Just as long as they're all original and stuff... more 1st gen-esque Pokemon, and less 3rd-gen-esqye Pokemon if you please. XD

The first pokemon created were well developed.. great work on artist creativity. Now.. it seems they are getting sloppy.. just putting something together to create more. There are awesome ones out there as well as really lame ones..

I'd have to say both sides. The more the pokemon there is the more you play to catch ALL of them. Its more challenging on the plus side.. but it does get you wondering if you caught it or not and stuff. Both sides I suppose for me.