[B]Current Blog List[/B]

Note: Each "Blog" has a direct link to the blog itself. By clicking the white colored Blog Entry's you will be brought directly to the post. Alternatively, you can scroll down to see some of the most recent entries.

[URL=""]Blog #1[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #2[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #3[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #4[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #5[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #6[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #7 (Cancelled)[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #8[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #9[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #10[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #11[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #12[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #13[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #14[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #15[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #16[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #17[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #18[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #19[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #20[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #21[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #22[/URL]

[URL=""]Blog #23[/URL]

Blog #24 (Coming Soon!)
Rate this Entry

Blog #13 - Avatar/Signature Rating Thread Rubric

Posted July 9th, 2013 at 12:15 PM by T!M

I get a lot of mad people posting messages to me based on my rating of their avatars and signatures in the respective threads.

I'm a very hard-to-please avatar/signature critic but I [i]am[/i] a nice guy and I don't want anyone to get the wrong impression and believe I rate them poorly because I have a personal grudge. So I have a list of things I go by when rating avatars and signatures in the hopes that people will be a little less upset if I rate them poorly.

Word. But you gotta be honest. Because if you're not honest, you're a liar. And no one likes a lying kiss-butt. Lol.

When it comes to rating avatars and signatures my rubric is as followed.

[B]ONE:[/B] I don't rate the same user's avatar/signature more than once unless he or she has changed their avatar/signature since last I rated.

[B]TWO:[/B] I do no rate in a biased manner. I rate on quality, cropping, color and style.

[B]THREE[/B] I don't rate based on the avatars/signatures subject in personal manner. (Meaning, Just because I don't like MLP, I will not rate a user's MLP avatar/signature poorly)

and [B]FOUR:[/B] The only avatars/signature I'll rate poorly regardless of style or quality is Pokémon Sprites and text-only signatures. Those have no way to be credited to the user (sprites) and are already used so much. And pretty-words a good signature does not make. (signatures)


So there you go. Sorry if I offended anyone recently and I'm so in advance if I offend anyone in the future.

~ Tim
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 3054 Comments 4
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 4


  1. Old Comment
    Ash's Avatar
    I don't completely agree with the fourth one (disagree more when it comes to signatures then avatars) but the first three are things I really wished more people would do.
    Posted July 9th, 2013 at 3:53 PM by Ash Ash is offline
  2. Old Comment
    Fairy's Avatar
    I'd be curious to know what you think of my signature then, considering mine is comprised of "pixel art" that I made.

    I agree with BinaryPeaches. I feel like you're taking the idea of sprites and text (which can be very emblematic of the user) and putting it in a very small box. :c
    Posted July 9th, 2013 at 9:43 PM by Fairy Fairy is offline
  3. Old Comment
    ShiningLust's Avatar
    Idc about it cuz I don't care what ppl say about my avatar/signature so its like what ever lol
    Posted July 9th, 2013 at 11:18 PM by ShiningLust ShiningLust is offline
  4. Old Comment
    Foxrally's Avatar
    Heya! A random link from the signature thread directed me here, but I found it quite interesting, but there's only one I disagree with, and it's the 4th one.

    I agree that text-only sigs are terrible, but Pokemon-sprite ones can be good. Take, for example, Dragonfly-Dust's signature. It's clean, not too crammed, and basically has mostly sprites.
    Posted August 26th, 2013 at 3:34 AM by Foxrally Foxrally is online now

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:18 AM.