Conversation Between VCaliber and TwilightBlade
106 to 120 of 209
  1. VCaliber
    February 19th, 2010 2:54 PM
    VCaliber
    Synd needs less believing and more thinking.
    In any case Polkop got on...finally...
  2. VCaliber
    February 19th, 2010 2:14 PM
    VCaliber
    I'd appreciate it. We've both been out of town for the past two days. I'm ready tonight, but I need Polkop to get online....
  3. TwilightBlade
    February 19th, 2010 2:11 PM
    TwilightBlade
    :(
    It is Syndrome's tourney, but do get the battle done asap, lol. I may be able to coax him to extending the deadline, but you must be prompt or else I LOOK UNCOOL!
  4. VCaliber
    February 19th, 2010 2:01 PM
    VCaliber
    That is so uncool lol. I have one hour for Polkop to get online then I get DQ too?
  5. TwilightBlade
    February 15th, 2010 10:46 AM
    TwilightBlade
    But keep it in Personal Message or whatever. :P
  6. VCaliber
    February 15th, 2010 10:46 AM
    VCaliber
    Sorry, he did contact me personally to do it in the first place.
    So I don't think that really falls under that category xD
    I don't clone for others unless asked.
  7. TwilightBlade
    February 15th, 2010 10:43 AM
    TwilightBlade
    Referring to Valentine Eevee thread... Be careful when you say you'll clone for someone. I do not want ~cloning services~ on public threads because others will ask you to clone... I know you won't scam, but I do not want to have to deal with drama such as:

    Noob: TB TB TB Nova stole my Poke!
    Nova: -out to dinner-
    Noob: TB PUNISH NOVA
    TB: -eats pizza-

    y/n?
  8. TwilightBlade
    February 14th, 2010 7:20 PM
    TwilightBlade
    I updated with two monsters, hah. D8<
  9. VCaliber
    February 14th, 2010 2:00 PM
    VCaliber
    I understand ^^ I'm on now. EDIT- Thanks ^^
  10. TwilightBlade
    February 14th, 2010 1:59 PM
    TwilightBlade
    Ugh, doing like 10 things at once... Heading on wifi for you.
  11. VCaliber
    February 14th, 2010 1:50 PM
    VCaliber
    I know there are...you have some ^^ But, I'm going to breed some pokemon myself...
  12. TwilightBlade
    February 14th, 2010 1:48 PM
    TwilightBlade
    That is what I was referring to; legit.exe will simply say that it's hatched, and never say hacked/legit... It cannot tell the difference (based on my experience with it!). :(

    There are legit good IV Ttar and Scizor around here, noob. :(

    Yes, use Platinum... 0903 8758 7624.
  13. VCaliber
    February 14th, 2010 1:43 PM
    VCaliber
    Lol, you should write a book ^^ I was more refering to would it show on Legit.exe as hacked. I have a straight flawless T-Tar and Scizor that are saved, so I thought good IV parents migth get me better IVs in the baby. Oh, and do you have time to give the Cress back now? I need to trade it to someone...
  14. TwilightBlade
    February 14th, 2010 1:39 PM
    TwilightBlade
    hullo

    Eh, idk, my usual criteria for hacked Pokemon is:
    Is it unfair?
    Is it for malicious purposes?
    Is it outside the game limits?

    Perhaps unfair, as one is hacking a Meganium while another suffers through the bull that is Colosseum or completing Emerald's dex. Then again, hacking the dad would be a timesaver/shortcut. I will leave that to the individual to decide if shortcuts are ethical or not. It is like, skipping someone waiting in line for food, lawl....

    Most likely not malicious, as it is simply breeding, so not much profit anyways (as opposed to hacking events or shinies for profit). Then again, a Pokemon's value is in the eye of the beholder. As these first two reasons are so controversial, I would like to solve our dilemma by considering the third question...

    The baby is within game limits, so it is "legit" or maybe "semi legit" at best. What happens if you breed that baby with hacked parents? Its offspring is quarter legit? Then what? Tedious. How do you distinguish what parents or grandparents it had? No method can really determine if a baby is hacked or not (as babies can have any IV combination), so perhaps give it the benefit of the doubt. I prefer concrete evidence to label a hack (unless the breeder flat out states that he/she uses hacked parents, then we have a good reason to be suspicious).

    Now, producing a baby with an illegal combination of egg moves or in an illegal location (Johto, Mystery Zone, etc) is hacked; not within game limits. Hope that clears things up? ^^
  15. VCaliber
    February 14th, 2010 12:26 PM
    VCaliber
    Lol that thread was pretty funny. Anyways, if you breed a hacked pokemon and a ditto, is the baby hacked?