Conversation Between Åzurε and Richard Lynch
Showing Visitor Messages 16 to 19 of 19
-
July 24th, 2010 9:01 AMRichard LynchWell, it's been my opinion for many, many years now that morals are totally relative. It depends on who's looking, it depends on the culture, the environment. Moral truth is dependent on the person; some cultures may glorify things that other cultures damn, its kind of that simple. Who has the right to say which is correct, if any one is? And don't say religion, because I've yet to see a religion which has followed its own morals to a tee throughout its history (you'll hate me for this, but Catholicism is the prime example here). Actually, in Catholicism, I don't think there is a single Commandment that has remained unbroken, even down to "Thy shalt not worship false Gods before me" (Catholicism makes mini-Gods out of Saints and, and, for example, statistically, more people pray to the Virgin Mary than to Jesus).
I actually just woke up, and my brain is still booting up, so I hope that was at least somewhat coherent. haha -
July 23rd, 2010 4:36 PMÅzurεIt's been a good while since I've done VMs like this... It's good to be back! xp
So, I've already elaborated a tad. Tell me a bit about how you see things. -
June 4th, 2010 6:53 AMÅzurεThank you for the complement. It's not often I find somebody who I can actually have such a discussion with.
-
June 3rd, 2010 11:00 PMRichard LynchWell, I do believe we've reached the dénouement of our religion debate. I'd just like to virtually shake your hand and say I'm impressed with your integrity, and how you handled counterpoints. From my point of view, you were the worthiest of opponents, and the discussion/debate was a true pleasure.
Kudos, man.

