Conversation Between Åzurε and Luck
Showing Visitor Messages 31 to 35 of 35
-
September 11th, 2009 5:22 PMÅzurεNone taken, and I can see why it would seem ridiculous. Some things don't make sense until you really study, and I don't see why He would have created women the way He did, myself, except perhaps as a metaphorical second meaning for the man's familial position.
-
September 11th, 2009 5:12 PMLuckThat purely depends on your interpretation of the holy script of your choice. I never treated it seriously because the idea of a woman coming from ribs is absurd when taken seriously; no offense if you believe this.
-
September 11th, 2009 5:09 PMÅzurεI don't mean a sudden species shift either, One logical conclusion that can be made from the passage is that according to the Bible, organisms will not deviate and mutate enough to reproduce with decidedly different organisms. To say that a chimp would suddenly reproduce and create a human being would be ignorant on many levels.
-
September 11th, 2009 5:01 PMLuckSorry, but you don't have the right idea of macro evolution. It is roughly the same as micro evolution, but that over longer periods time, the differences between species become apparent enough until they split and are unable to have children that can reproduce. A monkey giving birth to a human would actually disprove evolution, but that is beside the point.
-
September 11th, 2009 4:58 PMÅzurεEh, I'll probably not keep this up much longer, but I'm good for about 2-3 back-and-forths. In the evolution debate, which wasn't meant to be an evolution debate:
My main points are in your previous posting, you essentially come across as considering yourself a source of truth, and your responses neither respect beliefs nor other people as worth your time. If this is the case, don't bother posting. If not, I'd suggest reading your post once or twice before publishing it. As for the issue about Christians and macroevolution, in at least 3 places in Genesis, Chapter one, it says God created beings to produce according to their own kind, which means a dog will not give way to a cat, or a monkey giving birth to a human, or a reptile producing a bird. I don't see how this could be misinterpreted. And I have indeed found enough evidence to conclude that macroevolution is incredibly flawed and inaccurate.

