Showing Visitor Messages 316 to 330 of 381
-
January 18th, 2011 11:45 AMPokestick, good times.All right then xD;;
Thanks :33 -
January 18th, 2011 11:43 AMalisaieWell, Gavin says it's alright. So /shrugs.
It did! Much better than what I would be able to do. -
January 18th, 2011 11:40 AMPokestick, good times.You do that.
And My Natsu piece for Rossu turned out pretty good :3 -
January 18th, 2011 10:34 AMalisaieYeah. I guess I'll see about asking one of 'em next time they're around.
-
January 18th, 2011 10:22 AMPokestick, good times.Strange.
I think the best thing would be to ask Bill and Nica themselves. -
January 18th, 2011 10:19 AMalisaieThat's true. It would be nice if there could be only one angle. I think the mods thought there was when the rules were changes, but then... they multiplied?
-
January 18th, 2011 10:16 AMPokestick, good times.It does.
But it's still possible the rules can be looked at from different angles. -
January 18th, 2011 10:14 AMalisaieI think this would sum it up quite nicely. :VOriginally Posted by Hiiro [ Original Post ]If the image is within the image, then that's fine as far as I'm picturing it. But side by side, or on top of each other, they cannot bypass the image size limit.
-
January 18th, 2011 10:11 AMPokestick, good times.Perhaps I got it wrong the way they said it, or maybe they were insecure themselves?
...Or perhaps nobody who thought of the rules like that looked carefully at your signatures?
All the confusion! D: -
January 18th, 2011 10:06 AMalisaieExactly. Not to mention I've had this signature for... at least a month and a half and I haven't been told anything. I think if it was bypassing the limit, someone would have told me by now. :(
-
January 18th, 2011 10:04 AMPokestick, good times.Vikalp said something about Christina having several large images on top of each others once, and no one mentioned it.
-
January 18th, 2011 9:21 AMalisaieLooks like we have some disagreements within the staff. Orz. I can go and get what Hiiro said in the thread, but I doubt that would change anything. This means that my signature, as well as Dondon's, Rossu-pie's, and Niinii's are also breaking the limit. What now. :/
-
January 18th, 2011 9:07 AMPokestick, good times.Because I asked Nica and Bill on MSN, and they quoted "The total amount of images you have in your signature cannot exceed that limit. The use of CSS in signatures cannot be used to bypass the latter limit either." and said it wasn't allowed :/
-
January 18th, 2011 9:04 AMalisaieNo, because he's on the background image. If he was under the background image, then it would be rule breakage. This was questioned when the rules changed, and Hiiro said it was alright (Rossu-Pie was asking about the theme that both her and me was using, which had a 450x200 background, and then three 400x150 icons on top).
-
January 18th, 2011 9:02 AMPokestick, good times....Wait, considering how my profile picture is 500x300, wouldn't adding Red technically be rule breakage?

