Conversation Between .little monster and ♣Gawain♣
16 to 29 of 29
  1. .little monster
    November 5th, 2009 12:39 PM
    .little monster
    Haha that's awesome.

    So..you live in Russia but dont speak Russian? XD; Strange
  2. ♣Gawain♣
    October 22nd, 2009 3:57 AM
    ♣Gawain♣
    I'm confused on where I will post this, lolz

    I'm fine. I've just bought "Speaking Russian for Dummies". And really, speaking it is not really that essential 'cause people here also speak a little "eengleesh".

    haha
  3. .little monster
    October 21st, 2009 2:25 PM
    .little monster
    Hey, I am Nich'ya. Nich'ya is my reserve account for my next account. o:

    So I will re-post what I said to save you time from scrolling down. X3;

    Privet! o: That's cool! I am just starting to learn Russian. XD;

    Kak dela?
  4. .little monster
    June 9th, 2009 7:13 PM
    .little monster
    Haha okay! Have fun!

    And we can pump sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere which has the opposite affect of CO2 but..it would be so much easy just to make mechanical trees that take in CO2 and bring out O2 (or O3 [ozone] in case we need to replenish the ozone layer)..
  5. ♣Gawain♣
    June 9th, 2009 7:08 PM
    ♣Gawain♣
    Hey, thanks for the conversation. I still have classes so, till next time!

    Hope we still have a way to refreeze the ice caps!
  6. .little monster
    June 9th, 2009 7:06 PM
    .little monster
    No I am not and they are everywhere. :P
  7. ♣Gawain♣
    June 9th, 2009 7:06 PM
    ♣Gawain♣
    Right you are. All we need is the resources and materials, and a bit more dedication and time, then...

    Although Hitler's scientist did make a "UFO", although controversial and a lot of nonsense and crap.

    You're from Canada right? Are the glaciers melting there?:'(
  8. .little monster
    June 9th, 2009 7:01 PM
    .little monster
    That would be most logical. I was just saying, we have the technology we don't need anything on the scale of UFO technology to create gravity. :P
  9. ♣Gawain♣
    June 9th, 2009 6:59 PM
    ♣Gawain♣
    In order to make that kind of rocket go, it needs a lot of fuel. Which in turn, needs a lot of resources, not to mention money. How about solar-power? Or better, solar-wind power to fuel it up?
  10. .little monster
    June 9th, 2009 6:52 PM
    .little monster
    No it wouldn't just a rocket. Not huge-huge but around the size of the space shuttle. Obviously done already.
  11. ♣Gawain♣
    June 9th, 2009 6:45 PM
    ♣Gawain♣
    It'll probably need a lot of energy to create the centrifugal force for that, like UFOs.

    And maybe in the future, we don't need rockets.
  12. .little monster
    June 9th, 2009 6:27 PM
    .little monster
    They can simply make the ship spin by one series of rocket shots to create a g-force though. They don't need any fancy machines to create it for a ship.
  13. ♣Gawain♣
    June 9th, 2009 5:57 PM
    ♣Gawain♣
    Probably both. A ship that can manipulate g-force like Earth's is more comfy than a ship with null-gravity like today's space station.
  14. .little monster
    June 9th, 2009 5:52 PM
    .little monster
    You would think they would come up with a mean of interstellar travel before gravitational manipulation.