The PokéCommunity Forums
Hands's Profile

Hands's Profile Picture

Hands Hands is offline

Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 15 of 117
  1. Maple Leaf
    3 Days Ago 5:16 AM
    Maple Leaf
    Yes, and far-right extremist Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people in 1995. Since then, few white people have done anything notable (by those standards). Muslims, however? Being locked down for days after the Boston Marathon bombing, I've experienced it myself.
  2. Maple Leaf
    3 Days Ago 1:43 PM
    Maple Leaf
    OK, so at least you mean modern times. That's good.

    Two or three? I looked on Wikipedia (each listed attack is cited to some extent), and dating back 50 years, there have been far more than three attacks. By the way, is the IRA a threat now?
  3. Maple Leaf
    4 Days Ago 10:34 AM
    Maple Leaf
    Define "historically." So like, when whites were 95% of those countries? 90%? When Islamic terrorism wasn't the foremost threat to the West? Elaborate.

    And that's sad. Keep agreeing with Fox News without realizing it.
  4. Maple Leaf
    4 Days Ago 10:10 AM
    Maple Leaf
    There is no baseless bullmuk. We have a terrorism problem, and abortion unintentionally controls population. Simple!
  5. Maple Leaf
    4 Days Ago 9:55 AM
    Maple Leaf
    I know what an echo chamber is. People surround themselves with zero dissenting views, and just hear the same thing over and over, like echoes. Please delete that post; it is off-topic.
  6. Maple Leaf
    4 Days Ago 8:58 PM
    Maple Leaf
    >white genocide not real
  7. Thepowaofhax
    2 Weeks Ago 8:18 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    Again, no. I'm not crying everything is Communism/Witches/Other examples of historical McCarthyism.

    By the way, you seem to understand very little about Communism. The end goal of it is anarchy because it seeks a stateless society, but it calls for a dictatorship of the proletariat as one of the transitioning phases. This is where you get your authoritarian forms of Communism that never manage to get to anarchy. Even in the manifesto it calls for a stateless society after all of these transitional phases, in which anarchy does not help the worker.

    Also, when Marx did write this, there were political avenues to better the conditions. The problem is that they were extremely slow, but it had eventually won out. From exposes on the meat industry, to the eventual creation of the secret ballot, to mainstream political parties adopting some aspects of the Progressive and Populist party ideals, there were some avenues.

    And yes, while it is clear who is labeled bourgeoisie, lest us not forget that Communism will call anyone who is against it a class enemy even if they are in the working class.

    Also, you're a bloody idiot if you don't believe MLK didn't help with the Civil Rights of African Americans within the US. Rioting in the streets only gives the oppressors the tools to justify their repression. Civil insurgency should only be used if it is the only thing left.

    Also, Capitalism is again an economic theory. Racism and the above had existed before the advent of Capitalism, those were carryovers for the most part. Capitalism does not promote slavery, nor does it promote any of those listed. The only thing it promotes is classicism by economic standards. The rest are affected by culture.

    Again, not wrong. If an Islamic country attacks an ally like Israel, they had provoked it and will be put down with the maximum force of the military.

    Citation please, because otherwise, this is all jargon. We're all a democracy and every vote is for the most part equal (except for the Electoral College, that muk needs to be removed).

    By the way, if we're going to go by the extremists of our sides, maybe you should look at the Khmer Rouge and how they turned Cambodia into a backwards agrarian society for the sake of Khmer nationalism. "But-but they're ultranationalist, obviously they're Fascists" you say, but it's not like they were communist. /Reagan is cancer, so is Stalin and so is Pol Pot.

    By the way, you're using the hyper-capitalists to jab at me again. Last time I checked, killing all of those intelligent people back with the Khmer Rouge didn't plummet the quality of health care, it totally didn't at all! Social Democrats aren't this uber-capitalist cancer you are talking about; they want stuff such as the NHS but still want a capitalist economic model.

    Also, I was assuming the illiteracy you were talking about was the ability not to read, not grammatical issues/spelling issues. But I digress.

    Actually, that is incorrect again. After all, who would take positions like, oh I don't know, anything in Health Care besides CNA/other aides or any vocational education?

    Nice try there bud, but Juche is a Communist ideology and is debated to be a revisionist form. If you go to any scholarly source, it is listed as Communist. The only reason why you deny that is because it's uber-Nationalist.

    And no, I did not "deliberately" try to put down the Irish famine. Why would I put down a famine that affected my ancestors? Or are you really that McCarthyist and want to accuse me of everything?

    Also, Ukraine was a part of the USSR at that time, not a sovereign country, but as either a state or a puppet. Try again.

    By the way, Oligarchy isn't just a "Capitalist" thing. By definition:
    "a small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution."

    Guess who tends to control the country during any authoritarian transitional phase of Communism? That's right, the political organization that installed Communism in that country.

    The book is about all Authoritarian ideologies. Not just Fascism, not just Feudalism, not just Monarchism, just pure Totalitarianism. You're better off refuting my point by pointing at the CIA (which needs to be dismantled; I'd argue it's heavily Fascist in its current form myself).

    I'm not going to bother with the Holodomor tbh anyways, we're never going to agree to that at any point anyways (since we're just going to be pointing at stupid muk and trying to kafkatrap each other). By the way, those famines were caused when India had a colonial government (which tends to be Mercantalist). Capitalism in its moderate forms does not cause this kind of famine on purpose anyways, but back then I highly doubt the UK had any form of moderate capitalism (probably Laissez-Faire or something like that).
  8. Nihilego
    2 Weeks Ago 1:40 PM
    Nihilego
    hey there beautiful
  9. Thepowaofhax
    4 Weeks Ago 2:52 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    In fact, 1984 is mainly talking about the totalitarian regimes of tomorrow. Just because there is a hint of ultranationalism does not mean Communism can evolve into this, especially with the aforesaid ultranationalistic variants of Communism (Khmer Rouge, Juche.)
  10. Thepowaofhax
    4 Weeks Ago 2:29 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    "Everyone I don't like is a McCarthyist!"

    Anyways, this isn't a "lack of understanding for basic history", we can all agree that Laissez-Faire Capitalism and enslavement is terrible. However, that does not excuse the fact that Marx created an ideology inherently against the proletariat you want to defend (as last time I checked, anarchy never goes well) and to even create this utopian anarchy requires a dictatorship that will never fall because it will be given to the hands of those same corrupt individuals that you would call bourgeoisie. Instead of actually trying to negotiate with reasonable debate, your ideology calls for the violent overthrow of anyone who you label bourgeoisie. Funny thing is the most successful attempts to fix these problems all happened to be peaceful (MLK, Gandhi, etc).

    Secondly, this is not true under Capitalism because Capitalism is merely an economic theory. Communism encircle economic theory and political theory, and most of the time, we're at war because those "dissidents" either provoked us into war or because we're petty imperialists wanting to oil because we can't use our own oil for some reason.

    And yes, I know what Batista is, but last time I checked, you must be deluded to think Cuba is anywhere close to anything outside of a pure dictatorship. We backed Batista because the Truman Doctrine said to back anyone who is not Communist (which isn't capitalism at work but idiocy) and sadly the states felt a non-Communist dictatorship was the best thing.

    In regards to HIV, Capitalism is again not the problem here. They simply eradicated it, we have to many people with it screwing around. Not a problem. Also, that same health care system can happen under a capitalist system (see Social Democracy) and illiteracy is not 100% eradicated because we still have people alive from the time where African Americans were discriminated against and could not receive a decent education (which is not capitalism, it had to do with the bullmuk racialist ideals of the time).

    The Amish are not communist because they haven't either installed anarchy (if they even manage to get that far) or installed a one-party totalitarian system. Just because they raise a barn together doesn't make them communist. Also, no Communist state has ever gotten to the anarchist Utopia because every single one became a bloodthirsty dictatorship (and some of them even look like Fascism on paper; look at Juche).

    Also, considering you're openly defending anarcho-Communists, all of those oppressors are essentially dissidents, especially since you even suggested once that the definition of alt-Right to you is centre-Right,

    Also, that isn't revisionism at all. I'm calling it a potato blight because the famine was caused by a water mold that infected potatoes. Therefore, it is technically a blight that cause the famine, in which the terminology is still correct.

    What I'm saying here is that you're giving your trust in the same governments that denied the Holocaust until after the war was over (they wouldn't believe Pilecki's reports of what was happening in Auschwitz). The same happened here.

    Just because Stalin is an idiot does not absolve him from his crimes. He still forcibly starved a rebelling part of his country. While yes, the Kulaks did burn the crops, he still increased the quotas even during the drought and the loss of crops.

    Also, the foreign aid was in response to the general famine at that time period. The Holodomor is a specific part of this famine; just because they don't find it "man-made" doesn't stop them from giving the USSR foreign aid to alleviate the situation. The actual thing does not mention any specific country, however this website takes it from the UN Convention on the Prevention of Genocide of 1948.

    Actually, 1984 wasn't specifically talking about ultra-nationalism but the threat of oligarchy and dictatorships of the future (secret police, police state, punishment of dissidents, cult of personality around the leader, etc). Besides, it's not like there have been forms of ultra-nationalist Communism either (again, see Juche and whatever the hell the Khmer Rouge were trying to create). Hell, even the USSR had some forms of nationalism (not on the levels of ultranationalism) in regards to the country.
  11. Hands
    4 Weeks Ago 12:16 AM
    Hands
    Quote:
    >Communism not evil.
    Don't greentext, we're not on some low tier image board.

    Quote:
    >The actual ****ing document that created the ideology calls for the violent overthrow of anyone labeled "bourgeoisie".
    Standard low level understanding of basic history from a McCarthyist. The Communist Manifesto was written in 1848, a time where the British still enslaved orphans and forced them into horrific workhouses owned by the Bourgeois for free labour and where the American Bourgeois class still enslaved and massively abused black Americans and Africans. Marx spent most of his adult life in London where he got to observe the horrific treatment of the poor, the disabled, the elderly and children first hand. There were very few organisations that cared for anyone but the rich and there was absolutely no one in Parliament willing to work to a non violent solution (it would be over 60 years before Kier Hardie would be elected, giving Britain her first Socialist MP)

    Of course, you're not interested in factual or contextual analysis of the works of Marx, that'd involve thinking outside of what you've been told.

    Quote:
    >Every single manifestation of Communism that has ever existed and will exist in the future has lead to a despotic dictatorship in which thousands of dissidents are killed because they're sympathetic to the bourgeoisie.
    This is equally true of Capitalism, of course, the dissidents we're killing are brown people overseas but we're still killing them for not "sharing our values". Cuba, unlike the West, has direct democracy when it comes to policy. Every citizen gets a vote. Of course, Cuba's story is another that you'd be very happy to remove context from. See Cuba already had a brutal, US backed, capitalist dictator in Batista. The people overthrew him, Castro sought to mend US-Cuba relations and have a peaceful existence between the two but Eisenhower refused to meet with him and instead America put a crippling embargo on Cuba. They also tried to assassinate a head of state to a country they had no right to be in over 600 times. Given the constant threat to his life, the lack of international trade opportunity, the CIA backed Batista loyalists and the need to appear strong to the Russians as to not be swallowed up by them it is really no surprise that Castro had to rule through strength.

    Despite all this, the monthly utility bill for a family in Cuba is less than $5, their annual income tripled, every citizen has access to health care, free at the point of use, they're the first country on record to completely eradicate mother to infant transmission of HIV, Homelessness does not exist in Cuba anymore and not a single person is illiterate. Capitalism hasn't achieved a single one of these and has, more often than not, caused the problem in the first place.

    Quote:
    >Communism will never work if humans are involved due to rampant corruption.
    The Amish are, essentially, a communist society. Communism will work only after a transitional period (at least 50 years I should think) of progressive Socialism in the West. The only reason people are so selfish and corrupt is their reliance on the evils of capitalism.

    Quote:
    Golly gee batman, it's totally not violent, amirite?
    Are you somewhat forgetful or? I've openly supported violence against the oppressors. The bourgeois who profit off of the broken backs of the working class deserve to be stripped of their assets, and if they resist, they can be met with the same violence they have doled out time and again via Police, Military and Austerity measures.

    Quote:
    Also, you're comparing multiple famines in the second most population-dense place in the world. You can't compare the damage of the two.
    That's funny, because when BadSheep listed the overall deaths under Communist leaderships worldwide you didn't feel the need to highlight to him that the most populous country in the world was on that list. Either way, I'll play your pedantic game. The famine of 1783-1784 saw 11 Million dead. In South India alone. Incredible though how that was your only retort, that you felt no need to address the fact the British used incredibly similar methods to Stalin.

    Quote:
    If I compare Mao's great famine to the potato blight in Ireland
    There it is, that dirty, nasty revisionism. Reducing Ireland's famine that wiped out 25% of their population to a simple "blight". People like you are the real evil, who blame some boogeyman whilst defending a real monster.

    Quote:
    Also, you're trusting the same countries that did not believe the ****ing Holocaust's damage when Witold Pilecki told them what the hell the Nazis were doing in Auschwitz during the war.
    How can you say apples and oranges to the famines but then bring up this? Not believing someone is not the same as doing your own research, sending your own people to investigate, compiling several reports form different sources and reaching a conclusion. You're getting really desperate here.

    Quote:
    And again, if this famine was not man-made, why would the Soviet government give quotas that Ukraine would not be able to follow
    Because Stalin was an idiot. Also the quotas wouldn't of been so hard to meet if the Kulaks didn't burn the bleeding fields

    Quote:
    having the government take all the grain they produce
    again, if the Kulaks didn't burn the fields and hoard the grain then there would of been more grain than was taken.

    Quote:
    Why did he PURPOSELY ignore foreign aid that would potentially prevent such a tragedy?
    What foreign aid was this? The British and French concluded there was no man made famine. Germany certainly could not help in 33 and America was in the pits of the great depression (another marvel of capitalism) so what foreign aid are you talking about? Be specific.

    Quote:
    How about the fact that he wanted to punish Ukraine for being the most rebellious state in the USSR?
    He wanted to punish the Kulaks, which he did, by throwing them in the Gulags. The famine was not a punishment and Stalin himself commented about how awful the famine was when discussing the state of the Union with Churchill during the second world war.

    Quote:
    learly the gods of Marxism would never want to destroy individualism and actually give you what 1984 warns about, right?
    More pedantic nonsense from someone acting like a petulant child. 1984 was a book about ultra nationalism, not Communism. Animal Farm was about Communism. It might help if you had actually read either of Orwell's (himself a socialist) big works.
  12. Thepowaofhax
    4 Weeks Ago 3:28 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    >Communism not evil.
    >The actual psyducking document that created the ideology calls for the violent overthrow of anyone labeled "bourgeoisie".
    >Every single manifestation of Communism that has ever existed and will exist in the future has lead to a despotic dictatorship in which thousands of dissidents are killed because they're sympathetic to the bourgeoisie.
    >Communism will never work if humans are involved due to rampant corruption.

    Golly gee batman, it's totally not violent, amirite?
    ‘The violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie lays the foundation for the sway of the proletariat.’

    Or how about this statement?
    "You must, therefore, confess that by "individual" you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible."

    Even the founding father of Communism said most revolutions must be violent. Then he said we should have a dictatorship of the proletariat, and luck what we psyducking get.

    Also, you're comparing multiple famines in the second most population-dense place in the world. You can't compare the damage of the two. If I compare Mao's great famine to the potato blight in Ireland and say Mao's famine is worse, it's because more people lived there. It's comparing apples to oranges; the USSR never had any population density similar to China nor would Ukraine, at that time, ever had that density.

    Also, you're trusting the same countries that did not believe the psyducking Holocaust's damage when Witold Pilecki told them what the hell the Nazis were doing in Auschwitz during the war.

    And again, if this famine was not man-made, why would the Soviet government give quotas that Ukraine would not be able to follow, having the government take all the grain they produce, and letting them starve to death? Why did he PURPOSELY ignore foreign aid that would potentially prevent such a tragedy? Even at the very end of the day, he even denied the right to leave Ukraine during the Holodomor. How about the fact that he wanted to punish Ukraine for being the most rebellious state in the USSR? Obviously this is all a coincidence, clearly the gods of Marxism would never want to destroy individualism and actually give you what 1984 warns about, right?
  13. Thepowaofhax
    February 16th, 2017 1:52 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    The entire Soviet famine was man-made due to collectivization. Kulaks were branded as class enemies and brutal enforcement of grain was forced upon them, in which the Soviets drastically increased quotas in 1932-33, leading to most people being unable to meet quotas. Stalin had put in place many laws specifically targeting Ukraine.

    Stalin also ignored any political aid despite people being starved and even said that these people should taught a lesson through famine.
    https://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/center-study-genocide-conflict-resolution-and-human-rights/ukrainian-famine

    To not call it man-made is delusional; while drought had some play in this, Stalin was deliberately trying to punish Ukraine for trying to go against the government.
  14. Thepowaofhax
    February 15th, 2017 2:45 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    Actually, the Holodomor is classified as a genocide in twenty-five countries including Canada and Australia. This was a man-made famine that was created by Stalin's collectivization of farmland in which the collectivization is entirely intentional.

    Firstly, the Holodomor is recognized as a crime against humanity to the EU. Secondly, Ukraine put up the biggest fight against collectivization, and if he didn't try to root them out, collectivization could not go full stop. It was one of the only major states rebelling against Soviet leadership. So why would Stalin and the fact that he had the intention to quell the rebellion of rural Ukrainian could potentially lend it as a genocide.
  15. Thepowaofhax
    February 14th, 2017 3:20 PM
    Thepowaofhax
    Yeah, how about no. The Holodomor is no myth and anyone who believes that is in the same league as Holocaust deniers and the Armenian genocide deniers.

About Me

  • About Hands
    Gender
    Male ♂
    Go Team
    Do not display

Statistics

Total Posts
Activity by Forum
Visitor Messages
Blog
General Information
  • Last Activity: 1 Hour Ago 9:09 AM
  • Join Date: August 8th, 2016
  • Referrals: 1

Friends

Showing Friends 1 to 9 of 9
  • Cloyster
    • Cloyster is offline
  • Goku
    • Goku is online now
  • goranthegreat
    • goranthegreat is offline
  • hashtag
    • hashtag
    • [img]http://pldh.net/media/pokecons_action/403.gif[/img]
    • hashtag is offline
  • JDJacket
    • JDJacket is offline
  • Kleminator
    • Kleminator is offline
  • Rabinov
    • Rabinov
    • [div=font-size: 19px; font-family: 'Alegreya sans SC'; font-weight: 100; background: -webkit-linear-gradient(left, #A6A6A6, #6699FF); -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent;]f a k e y o u o u t.[/div]
    • Rabinov is offline
  • Rainbow
    • Rainbow is offline
  • Sylvie
    • Sylvie is offline

Emblems

Emblem Showcase - 1 Total
  Emblem
My Goodies
You manipulated me into giving you this, didn't you?
Awarded: December 5th, 2016 2:50 AM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.