Varius

I understand fully why you brought up Eastern Europe, you panicked when you couldn't bizarrely blame the economy for the riots in France and Britain so you used a half backed and incorrect stance that became semi popular among right wing social media spaces after a false meme was shared. You didn't even realise that Poland (the only country you managed to name) had a more robust social state than the US. Your whole point fell to pieces with that. Countries with less welfare would have to actually have less welfare to begin with, I mean that'd be a good place to start.

You have zero, zero evidence to back your claim that austerity does not lead to individuals becoming violent and virtually every historical event linked to it says otherwise. Hodgkinson's social media accounts were full of criticisms particularly of austerity, cuts and republican corruption. He was found with a list of six congressmen he planned to target, all with specific voting records around Austerity. Scalise wasn't shot simply because of political opinion, he was shot because of his political record in office. You can't even grasp that basic fact.

No one is suggesting we just go out and shoot Trump supporters and if Hodgkinson had done that I'd of condemned him. He didn't. He didn't attack randoms in the street simply for not sharing his beliefs.

I don't even want to deal with your idiotic rhetoric around Castro but I guess, for the sixth time, I'm going to have to.

Castro was not the "head of the army" Cienfuegos was. Castro's role in the Cuban Military post revolution was the same as the US president being "Commander in Chief". I know you've made zero effort to be even remotely bothered by fact during this but I'd be interested in seeing you try and disprove the constitution.

I haven't lost dick buttercup, I simply didn't want the infractions for continuing. I'll happily dismantling every idiotic, hypocritical bit of backpedaling you throw out here if you wish.

What violence rhetoric did Bernie Sanders put forward then? I don't recall him offering to pay the legal bills of anyone who beat up peaceful protestors at this rallies.

You said that austerity does not push certain people to violence, I used Greece, among others, as an example of how that was not the case, to which you went off on a Tanganyika about eastern European countries you don't know much about. I said political assassinations were sent to convince terrorism so you went on one about how Castro wasn't a civilian despite being a non combatant and a political head of state for nearly a decade before the USA started commiting terrorism against him. Every time I have veered off topic it has been in response to someone other tangent you've come up with

To which you went off on numerous tangents as opposed to answering them in context of the topic.

I'm not replying to you derailing the thread any further but I thought I should probably tell you castro is dead and has been for a while so I'm really not sure why you're talking about him in present tense