Quote:
|
The 3DS is a gimmick for the most part. 3D will not be anything gameplay changing, that's what makes it a gimmick. The analog stick does actually change gameplay, but I'd hardly think a DS with a horrible battery and an analog stick would be worth $250.
|
Why thank you for stating an opinion that has no factual bearing to the argument whatsoever.
Quote:
|
Actually, Sony did the same thing Nintendo did. The PSP 2000 was a slimmer version of the 1000(just like the DSLite) and the 3000 added a new higher resolution screen and added a microphone. And the PSP2 is just as guilty of not changing with design since the 3DS, but at least it has much more gameplay altering features, rather than a small 'ooh' factor. And I don't even understand what you're saying by this point, the PSP not changing is not a gimmick. The 3DS is a gimmick because it flaunts 3D, a useless feature that doesn't change gamplay whatsoever, it's not because it didn't change much from the 3DS.
|
It would be much better if you could explain how the PSP changes these "gameplay-altering" features other than being completely vague about it.
Quote:
|
The 3DS is a gimmick because it flaunts 3D, a useless feature that doesn't change gamplay whatsoever, it's not because it didn't change much from the 3DS.
|
Is it me, or are your arguments getting more and more opinionated by the sentence? Seriously? I would love to see a list of everything groundbreaking the PSP has gameplay wise that completely outclasses the 3DS.
Quote:
|
And I don't even understand what you're saying by this point, the PSP not changing is not a gimmick. The 3DS is a gimmick because it flaunts 3D, a useless feature that doesn't change gamplay whatsoever, it's not because it didn't change much from the 3DS.
|
Is it that you don't understand what I'm saying, or do you refuse to refute my argument? Or are you hating because Nintendo actually made the very first handheld that slaps around every version of the PSP ever made? You can make every single remark about Mario. Link, Samus and Pokemon all that you can, but I bet you that you can't come up with one game ever made by Sony itself that has lasted more than 20 years and have millions of fans.
Yeah, I thought so.
And don't you dare say Final Fantasy, because you know as well as I do that was Square Enix. At least Nintendo, as a company by itself, could actually
make games. While I do admit that Sony spends other time making my microwave, television, CD player and laptop, thats still no excuse not to spend some other time not making crap handheld remakes with absolutely little to no change whatsoever.
One of the important points of the 3DS
is to flaunt around the 3D, which is a major point of the system, and a major money seller and what gets people hooked into it the most. Most people disagree with the fact that graphics is the single aspect that makes the game, but a lot of us can't deny that graphics play a damn well good part in how we'll play a game.
Sorry to say, but if the only thing you have against the 3DS is that it's a gimmick and that it has "terrible" buttons, that really shows how much of a pure blind sony fanboy you are, which in itself, is pretty sad. Just being blunt here.
And before you retort and say something about "My Nintendo fanboyism" keep in mind that I'm not even fond of
both companies. Yet I still know that Sony has area to improve in when it comes to certain areas(and believe me, Nintendo has the same issue, too), but at least Nintendo is doing an impressive job getting people's once technologically illiterate grandmothers into video gaming, and that's an achievement in itself.