The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Feedback & Support (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Signature rules and review thread (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=122171)

Translator April 24th, 2009 12:11 AM

Is my signature within the limits.?

Sanctuary April 24th, 2009 8:07 AM

Would I be able to check if my signature is alrite?
It looks like it's breaching the rules. >:

*~Fireheart~* April 24th, 2009 6:04 PM

Is my signature too big? I have no idea how big or tall pixels are :confused look:

Nitrous Oxide April 24th, 2009 7:48 PM

I'm going to assume mine is still fine... these last changes have been weird.

Also, how much height do I have left?

Nick April 24th, 2009 8:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErickaVolt (Post 4575997)
I know my signature is within limits but is it enough appropriate for this forum?

I would think so. You haven't gotten it disabled yet and from what I know of, there aren't any reports regarding it being inappropriate. It isn't as if... it's actually showing it exposed or anything. But I suppose that decision is better left to be made by higher staff.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheekoo (Post 4576209)
Is my signature within the limits.?

Yes. 200 x 230. You've got 300 x 70 pixels still available for use.
300 being the width, 70 being the height.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sanctuary (Post 4576881)
Would I be able to check if my signature is alrite?
It looks like it's breaching the rules. >:

The width of your signature is 87 pixels too wide. It's due to those eggs I'm afraid. :<

Quote:

Originally Posted by *~Fireheart~* (Post 4578535)
Is my signature too big? I have no idea how big or tall pixels are :confused look:

Oh dear, oh dear. The maximum size for images is 500 x 300. Your signature is 596 x 234. Your 96 pixels too wide, which means you should probably remove one of those trainer cards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitrous Oxide (Post 4578790)
I'm going to assume mine is still fine... these last changes have been weird.

Also, how much height do I have left?

Yours is fine at the moment. Combined it's 486 x 226, so you have 14 pxs left for the width and 74 pixels left for the height.

AJ™ April 25th, 2009 8:17 AM

Is mah signature Hokai?

D:

Zebra Thunderhead April 25th, 2009 9:03 AM

Perfectly fine. It's at the width max but you have plenty of room height wise.

Hagumi April 25th, 2009 10:53 AM

Signature check please, and thank you.

Ivysaur April 26th, 2009 11:29 PM

300 px x 100 px is perfectly fine~

Ninja Caterpie April 29th, 2009 1:38 AM

If I add
http://img.gpxplus.net/0/40/ZGNlAQD/image.pnghttp://img.gpxplus.net/1/217/ZGR2BGR5/image.pnghttp://img.gpxplus.net/1/218/ZGR3ZQH3/image.pnghttp://img.gpxplus.net/1/236/ZGVkAGLk/image.pnghttp://img.gpxplus.net/2/41/ZGZ1ZmD2/image.pnghttp://img.gpxplus.net/2/93/ZGD4Zwx4/image.png
to the bottom of my sig, will it be too long? And could I add "Click my friends, too!" in size one font?

Ivysaur April 29th, 2009 6:20 AM

If you put them in another line, then it would be fine by 21 px of height, so yeah.

Sweet Candace April 29th, 2009 3:37 PM

I'm wondering if my signature is fine since I have a handful of quotes in. Should I remove them? Or is it fine as is?

Ooka April 29th, 2009 3:52 PM

Erm, is this alright? It looks a bit big. :/

.inLOVE April 29th, 2009 4:15 PM

Is my signature too high?

Edit: All fixed.

Nick April 29th, 2009 4:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Candace (Post 4594106)
I'm wondering if my signature is fine since I have a handful of quotes in. Should I remove them? Or is it fine as is?

400 x 175 image makes you go to the last limit section.
7 lines of size 1 text.
1 line of size 2 text.
It's fine. :>

Quote:

Originally Posted by ɐʞoo (Post 4594122)
Erm, is this alright? It looks a bit big. :/

400 x 335: no, it's too big. Too big by 35 pixels.

THIRTY-SIX April 30th, 2009 10:24 PM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v510/munna170488/Picture1-10.pngthirty-six | pair imagination creates beauty | do as i say not as i do | cogito ergo sum | ERAM QUOD ES, ERIS QUOD SUM

The width changes dependant of your screen resolution. I don't believe there wa a css bg colour limit.

Patatas Fritas May 1st, 2009 8:36 AM

Is my new signature too large?

Master Terrador May 1st, 2009 9:20 AM

Check the Sig. Please...Thanx

dragpyre May 2nd, 2009 2:07 AM

Can you have a look and see if my sig is ok?

Thank you.

destinedjagold May 4th, 2009 6:34 AM

I almost forgot...
I changed my signature lately...

Now, is my new signature still within the limits?

Thanks in advance~

BeachBoy May 4th, 2009 7:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rafey (Post 4598659)
Is my new signature too large?

Nope, your signature is a-okay. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragonfirenightmare9 (Post 4598732)
Check the Sig. Please...Thanx

Within the limits. /o/

Quote:

Originally Posted by DragpyRe94 (Post 4601262)
Can you have a look and see if my sig is ok?

Thank you.

Too wide by 427 pixels, the side-by-side userbars are the issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by destinedjagold
I almost forgot...
I changed my signature lately...

Now, is my new signature still within the limits?

Thanks in advance~

You're fine, destinedjagold.

Her May 4th, 2009 7:56 PM

Just checking image size, AS ALWAYS.

BeachBoy May 4th, 2009 7:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paris Hilton (Post 4612965)
Just checking image size, AS ALWAYS.

396px × 333px

Too tall by 33 pixels. :x

Hagumi May 5th, 2009 9:58 AM

Just dropping in, and wondering if my signature is okay. I believe it is, but it's always better to play safe.

BeachBoy May 5th, 2009 8:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hagumi (Post 4614384)
Just dropping in, and wondering if my signature is okay. I believe it is, but it's always better to play safe.

No worries, Hagumi, your signature is perfect-o~

Jake♫ May 6th, 2009 3:04 PM

Just checking in to see if mine is all right.

*~Fireheart~* May 6th, 2009 3:36 PM

Im wondering if my signature's too tall.

Nick May 6th, 2009 4:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake™ (Post 4618207)
Just checking in to see if mine is all right.

Your signature is within the limits.

Quote:

Originally Posted by *~Fireheart~* (Post 4618372)
Im wondering if my signature's too tall.

No, your signature is fine. It's 298x284.

A Pixy May 8th, 2009 8:08 AM

Allowed?
_____________________________________________________________________________

http://i532.photobucket.com/albums/ee328/Thundapolt/Gigantopistol.gif

fenyx4 May 9th, 2009 10:16 AM

Hi. In my current disabled sig, I was wondering: is it the sentence or the images causing the excessive 106-pixel width? I was thinking it's the sentence since that is the thing that protrudes most when you view it within the orange "disabled sig notice" box.

I was thinking of pressing enter right before the "And I can finally..." part to separate the line into 2 smaller sentences, but I don't know if that would cause any sig height issues I'd have to adjust. Would that be OK to rectify the problem? Thanks in advance.

Ivysaur May 9th, 2009 10:55 AM

Cadet Falcon: 5756.97 KB (5 MB) is insanely huge. Try getting something smaller.

fenyx4: The width, as well as the height problems, are always caused by images, not by the text you use. In your case, if you put the Gold & Silver logos one under the other instead of in the same line, your signature would be exactly in the height limits.

fenyx4 May 9th, 2009 7:36 PM

I thought the problem might be the images. OK, I pressed "Enter" right after the HeartGold logo, but nothing seemed to change in the "edit signature" box.
However, the logos are now stacked. I think nothing seemed to change because of the way the page edits one's signature. In any case, my current revised signature is acceptable, right?

(Sorry, I removed the "disabled sig" tags in advance so I could properly view the sig. The sig enclosed by those tags made it seem as if I didn't change anything, and I wanted to verify the edit I made.)

Nick May 9th, 2009 8:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenyx4 (Post 4627949)
I thought the problem might be the images. OK, I pressed "Enter" right after the HeartGold logo, but nothing seemed to change in the "edit signature" box.
However, the logos are now stacked. I think nothing seemed to change because of the way the page edits one's signature. In any case, my current revised signature is acceptable, right?

(Sorry, I removed the "disabled sig" tags in advance so I could properly view the sig. The sig enclosed by those tags made it seem as if I didn't change anything, and I wanted to verify the edit I made.)

Now your signature's 1 pixel too tall.
Userbar: 19
Jirachi:48
Gold: 117
Silver:117

19 + 48 + 117 + 117 = 301

You may be able to slide with it only being too tall by 1 px depending on who comes to view the thread next, but.. to be on the safe side, I'd remove something from that. Either the userbar or the Jirachi...

Gusxx1 May 9th, 2009 9:25 PM

I'm just curious as to see if there is anything the matter with my signature. Is this type of signature allowed around here or no? (Avatar too)

True Reign May 9th, 2009 9:56 PM

I would like to know why my signature is disabled. Just PM me, so we don't make useless posts in this thread.

AJ™ May 10th, 2009 6:14 PM

Is my signature within reason?

Master Terrador May 10th, 2009 6:21 PM

Check the Sig. Please...Thanx in Advance...

Nick May 10th, 2009 6:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gusxx1 (Post 4628211)
I'm just curious as to see if there is anything the matter with my signature. Is this type of signature allowed around here or no? (Avatar too)

Nah, nothing to really worry about. From what I've come to know from my time here at PC, signatures with that type of content is allowed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -[JD]- (Post 4628278)
I would like to know why my signature is disabled. Just PM me, so we don't make useless posts in this thread.

Useless posts talking about a reviewed signature in the review thread? Makes no sense to me... so I'm gonna reply here instead of directing my reply elsewhere.

Anyway, I can see where the person who disabled the signature is coming from. That's really disturbing and is so much better left off of a children's forum. I don't think children should be seeing someone rip someone's organs out of their body and then twist their head, causing blood to go all over the place.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ò_ó (Post 4630919)
Is my signature within reason?

It is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .:+~Şңдɗσш Ɍдʯǫʊдɀд~+:. (Post 4630940)
Check the Sig. Please...Thanx in Advance...

Whatever your name reads... yes, your signature is fine.

Her May 12th, 2009 10:45 PM

I know the procedure.

How many pixels is it out?

Ivysaur May 13th, 2009 4:34 AM

It's -155 x -21 px out. Make it bigger if you want us to disable it :(

(345px × 279px is fine)

Awesome. May 13th, 2009 4:56 AM

is my signature any good in term of the rules

Ivysaur May 13th, 2009 6:26 AM

324 x 163 is perfectly fine~

Translator May 14th, 2009 1:30 AM

Um, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this but it's about my sig so I'm going to ask it here. In my sig, I just found a notice that said "Sig edited by admin - exploit found". What does that mean.? Do I have to remove something in my sig.?

Thanks. :)

Nick May 14th, 2009 3:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheekoo (Post 4640661)
Um, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this but it's about my sig so I'm going to ask it here. In my sig, I just found a notice that said "Sig edited by admin - exploit found". What does that mean.? Do I have to remove something in my sig.?

Thanks. :)

I'm going to assume that those eggs are going to be hatching sooner rather than later, and I'm also going to assume that they'll be the same width as the Glaceon of 56 pixels. That being said, the Dragonite card thing is 200 x 200. The Glaceon, being the largest image in your Pokémon list is 56 x 53. It doesn't effect the width of the signature, but it does the height. The dimensions from that are 200 x 253. The eggs currently don't effect anything in the signature because they fall within the width of the Dragonite card.

The image size when they all hatch would eventually be somewhere around 216 x 253, which is within the 500 x 300 limit. So you have nothing to worry about if you aren't planning on adding anything into your signature.

Sorry for the long response, but I felt I should clearly explain myself.

Micro May 14th, 2009 8:30 PM

Hello, I would like to know if my signature is within the limits. It doesn't look like it is.

Ivysaur May 15th, 2009 1:42 AM

400 x 292 is actually fine, but be careful when the eggs start hatching D;

Tyrantrum May 15th, 2009 4:12 PM

Hi hi~ I came to check if my signature is within the limits.

Ivysaur May 15th, 2009 11:34 PM

268 x 96 is perfectly within limits, yeah.

dragpyre May 16th, 2009 1:45 AM

hey i just changed my sig , and i was wondering if it was ok now?

I removed the sig reason, and the banners aren't side by side now....

Ivysaur May 16th, 2009 4:17 AM

350 x 104 is fine, and the text is within the limits, so it's okay.

cerulean15 May 16th, 2009 7:00 PM

I think I did this right, someone tell me if the signature I have now is ok?

Nick May 16th, 2009 7:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cerulean15 (Post 4647914)
I think I did this right, someone tell me if the signature I have now is ok?

The width is fine; however, the height is 444 px (234 + 169 + 41). 144 pixels too high.

jigglyppuff8 May 16th, 2009 7:18 PM

Just wondering if something like this is OK before I use it:

Spoiler:

_________________________________________
Image is 296 x 300 px and the icons are all 16 px is width and length (except for the one that's obviously wider than the other ones; it's 22 px in width)

*~Fireheart~* May 16th, 2009 10:51 PM

Is my signature within the limits?

Ivysaur May 17th, 2009 3:35 AM

jpp8: right now, the code seems fine and within the rules, so sure.
*~Fireheart~*: 378 x 274 is fine, yeah.

Translator May 18th, 2009 11:26 PM

I added something new in my signature. So, I came back here to check if it is still within the limits. :)

Thanks. :)

Sublime May 19th, 2009 3:57 PM

Coming in for a routine checkup.
Pun completely intended.

Nick May 19th, 2009 4:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheekoo (Post 4654407)
I added something new in my signature. So, I came back here to check if it is still within the limits. :)

Thanks. :)

Perfectly fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .Sublime (Post 4656151)
Coming in for a routine checkup.
Pun completely intended.

No, that's exceeding the width by 100 pixels. Each of them are 100 x 100 pixels leading it to be 600 x 243 pixels.

Nashua May 20th, 2009 2:08 PM

I wanted to see if it was okay. I checked the entire thing and it was 423 by 282 with the black background. Yes or no?

Nick May 20th, 2009 2:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nashua (Post 4658844)
I wanted to see if it was okay. I checked the entire thing and it was 423 by 282 with the black background. Yes or no?

420 x 280 is within the limits, Nashua.

Starlite May 20th, 2009 4:35 PM

I'd like mine checked, please~

Zebra Thunderhead May 20th, 2009 4:42 PM

Yours is more than okay, Starlite. You still have plenty of room.

Hagumi May 21st, 2009 7:56 AM

I think my signature is alright, but just to be sure, I'd like to have a signature check please. Thanks in advance.

Ivysaur May 21st, 2009 10:07 AM

100px × 100px is more than perfectly fine. You could have five of these in a row and still be fine.

Translator May 22nd, 2009 3:32 AM

I have a new signature and I would like to check if it's within the limits.

Thanks. :)

Sweet Candace May 22nd, 2009 3:49 PM

Is it okay if I put this image in? Would I have to tweak my sig to do so?

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b390/0GroudonKing0/GroudonKing/Candace.png

Zebra Thunderhead May 22nd, 2009 4:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheekoo (Post 4662892)
I have a new signature and I would like to check if it's within the limits.

Thanks. :)

It's perfectly within the limits.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Candace (Post 4664464)
Is it okay if I put this image in? Would I have to tweak my sig to do so?

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b390/0GroudonKing0/GroudonKing/Candace.png

You could add it either horizontally or vertically and it would still be within limits.

Konekodemon May 23rd, 2009 12:30 AM

Ok do not give me another infraction the sig I am using is 320x240 I know cause I reuploaded it onto imageshack

Ivysaur May 23rd, 2009 12:35 AM

I get 320px × 160px, which is fine either way.

Konekodemon May 23rd, 2009 12:50 AM

but now it's so small I can barely see it, can someone make it just a little bit bigger please to be right at the limit

alo123 May 24th, 2009 12:37 AM

Can someone tell me if this signature is the right size


Edit: Problem solved thanx went

Ivysaur May 24th, 2009 1:46 AM

400 x 289 is perfectly fine, don't worry.

BHwolfgang May 24th, 2009 10:40 AM

I was wondering if my signature is under the maximum size.

Bz May 24th, 2009 9:00 PM

hey, like everyone else (of course)
is my sig ok?
probably not

BeachBoy May 24th, 2009 9:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BHwolfgang (Post 4671136)
I was wondering if my signature is under the maximum size.

Definitely. 300 x 100 is a-okay.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bz (Post 4673590)
hey, like everyone else (of course)
is my sig ok?
probably not

Way too tall. The main image alone is 400 pixels in height. Overall it's 176 pixels over our 300 px height maximum.

Bz May 24th, 2009 9:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeachBoy (Post 4673631)
Definitely. 300 x 100 is a-okay.

Way too tall. The main image alone is 400 pixels in height. Overall it's 176 pixels over our 300 px height maximum.

lol, thought so. I'll change it


EDIT:
(like it bigger but...)
is it good now?

Swift! May 25th, 2009 10:07 PM

I know that my sig is perfectly fine, I mean... it's tiny. *pokes tiny sig*

But, this guy has a huge sig and I'm sure it's way over the limit.

Micro May 26th, 2009 3:33 AM

My sig needs a doctor.
Is it overweight~?

Signomi May 26th, 2009 3:43 AM

It certainly isn't. Your signature is within the limits.

Bz -- The images in your signature altogether total 318 pixels in height. That's 18 pixels over the height limit.

Micro May 26th, 2009 5:37 AM

Thanks Siggy. :3
Anyway, I have one more question.
If my sig contains pictures of the JoBros as the cherubs, will it be counted as pornography or something? :|
Well, because you know, cherubs and.. never mind, I'm pretty sure you guys now. XD

.Ozymandias May 26th, 2009 6:04 AM

Just a quick check; I think it's okay, but I wanted to check it really was! Thanks ^_^

Signomi May 26th, 2009 6:08 AM

MB, we appreciate your wanting to help, but please leave signature queries to be answered by staff members. :3

♣Gawain♣ May 28th, 2009 12:15 AM

Is mine OK? I tried to compare with others though.

Signomi May 28th, 2009 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bz (Post 4685568)
sorry, but once more
njl;hgfdghjkhgfdsfghm,

Your signature is within the limits.

Your post however, isn't. DO NOT BYPASS THE CHARACTER LIMIT. I don't care if you're trying to get a post pass by adding gibberish coloured white, it is NOT hard to type a word more just to make a complete sentence. You should be aware of this much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Rigel| (Post 4686338)
Is mine OK? I tried to compare with others though.

No. First of all, your image exceeds 300 pixels in height. Not only that, the file size for your image is too big. It's a hefty animation that takes around 800KB to load, which isn't what we're looking for on the forums. Decrease the amount or remove it. And when you do put an image in your signature, make sure it's one that's both reasonable in file size and dimension.

Frequency May 28th, 2009 8:43 AM

I edited my sig awhile ago. Is it under the limit now? Or....

Translator May 29th, 2009 5:04 AM

I'm here again to see if my signature is within the limits. xD

Thanks. :)

BrainWave May 29th, 2009 5:26 AM

I want to check whether it's alright for the contents in the spoil below to be in my sig:

Spoiler:


Otherwise, my current sig below should be alright, right?

BeachBoy May 31st, 2009 7:23 AM

That signature would fit within our limits, BrainWave. :D

Your signature is a-okay too, cheekoo.

Pokemon12345678901 June 1st, 2009 11:16 AM

Why was my signature disabled when I saw some even larger than mine?

Hagumi June 1st, 2009 11:22 AM

Signature check please and thanks in advance.

Zebra Thunderhead June 1st, 2009 11:25 AM

Pokemon12345678901, yours was disabled because one of the staff members saw it. The other person's wasn't disabled because well... the staff hasn't seen it yet. If you see a signature that is over the limits, please just report a post that they have made stating that the signature is over the limits and a staff member will take care of it.

Hagumi, yours is A-okay bb. <3

.Seth June 1st, 2009 11:26 AM

Signature check, please. Made a new one, want to see if it's the limits.

Captain Fabio June 2nd, 2009 5:23 AM

Double check mine now since it was disabled.

Is that alright?

300 pixels in height is a bit short :/

Signomi June 2nd, 2009 8:12 AM

Both your signatures are within the limits. :>

Palamon June 2nd, 2009 2:01 PM

Signature completely re-done is it okay still?

leecher June 2nd, 2009 10:20 PM

is this alright? :

Spoiler:
here is a list of my shinys:

uxie ( i did have a darkrai shiny but it was hacked so i traded it for this shiny)
rhyperior (shiny lvl 01)
entei
(shiny colleseum version)
electavire
(shiny lvl 04)
Event salamence
(shiny)
gengar
(shiny lvl 01)
dragonite
(shiny)
tyranitar
(shiny)
alakazam (shiny)
palkia
(shiny)
cacturne
(shiny lvl 4)
gyarados
(shiny lvl 8)
burmy
(shiny)
abra
(shiny)
castform
(shiny)
farfetchd
(shiny)
slaking
(shiny)
lopunny
(shiny)
fearow
(shiny)
delcatty
(shiny)
suicune
(shiny)
groudon
(shiny)
registeel
(shiny)
lucario
(shiny)
gliscor
(shiny)
militoc
(shiny hacked got it on wifi)
kirlia
(shiny)
deoxys
(shiny 29 ribbons every contest ribbn)
lugia
(shiny)
rayquaza (shiny might not be up for trade i will decide)
machamp
(shiny)
ho-oh
(shiny)
Darkrai (event: toys R us promotion/ ALAMOS. event moves: spacial rend, roar of time, dream eater, dark pulse. i deleted spacial rend for dark void and dark pulse for nightmare. stats=
263 hp
167 attk
200 defence
386 spatk
188 spd
348 sped.

regigigas (event movie 08)
manaphy (ranger version)
magmortar (p-b-r event)
electavire (p-b-r event)
mew
(shiny)
10 shaymins (5 tru)
jirachi (knows wish?)

Serene Grace June 2nd, 2009 10:39 PM

Not sure about my sig. I think the total is 450*150 but still. Meh.

leecher June 2nd, 2009 10:48 PM

is my sig good so far? i shortened it till it could fit

Master Terrador June 4th, 2009 12:20 PM

Time For A Sig Check...Thanx in advance...:)

U.Flame June 4th, 2009 7:19 PM

My sig's pretty long, but if I exceed the limits, it tells me so I'm pretty sure I'm in the clear but just for safety, is my signature okay?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.