| Apathetic_Yen |
May 5th, 2008 7:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by spike6958
(Post 3560008)
I guess you are one of those people who only buy games that the reviewers tell you to buy and then don't get to know the diffrence between a good game and a bad game like this, people like you are sad and are not allowed a say in weather a game is good or not, and if it is such a good game try and name some good things about Puzzle league, i can only think of one, which is that if you can't sleep the game is so boring that it will help you too fall asleep very quickly, the game is very BAD end of story.
|
Wow, becuz ive never played this game in my life, or anything similar to it. I was just using IGN's review as an example as to why this game is good. I'm also aware that Puzzle challeneg was reviewed better. I don't care about the story at all, I don't care about the way it is presented. I like the game becuz of its amazing gameplay. I play Tetris Attack (favorite SNES game) so I know that this is a good game. I liked 3D mode, it made things interesting, a smarter AI was a great improvement, Super Hard mode made things more challenging yet fun, and the game saved your progress. The only bad thing about this game I can point out is the total anime adaption but hey, I can get passed that kind of stuff. Saying that Puzzle challenge is 10x better when you can't even witness the AI's own movement and the AI relying on an 'HP' bar, a drift away from the original Panel de Pon style of play, is more of biased opinion.
I never said Puzzle League was the greatest game ever, I never said Puzzle Challenged sucked, I simply stated that your opininon was unacceptable towards mine. Maybe the 'lol' pissed you off, and ill say that im sorry for that. But don't ever say that I should not have a say in reviewing games because like I said, I was only using IGN's review as an example, seeing as there are other people out there who would argue that a game site's review proves that a game is good or bad.
|