The PokéCommunity Forums

The PokéCommunity Forums (https://www.pokecommunity.com/index.php)
-   Pokémon General (https://www.pokecommunity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   The Generation 5 / Future Generations Speculation Thread + Wishlist (https://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=158187)

Stronkadonk December 14th, 2008 4:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Fable (Post 4193815)
I think there definitely should be a Light type! But I think they made the Dark and Steel types to tone down Psychic's uberness in 1st gen... Is there an ubertype nowadays? Dark isn't unbeatable.

I can't imagine what new pokémon they would come up with after the recent additions... *coughRotomformscough*

And yes, there's only one Water/Electric :/

We will probably still never see something like Fire/Electric or Water/Fire. These types are simply too strong each, and putting them together would be... I mean, look what happened with Fighting/Fire or Dark/Fire. They're GOOD pokémon.

If you wanna see something like the one type cannot harm the other type of a Pokemon, there is Lanturn, and Gliscor. So I think we can expect to see some more of this in the future somewhere.

HollowNightmare December 14th, 2008 5:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MartianOddity (Post 4193983)
Anyhow, it's in full 3D! On the Nintendo DS handheld!

That would be awesome. But I doubt it will happen. :(

The Confuzzler December 14th, 2008 5:48 AM

Nah, i dont think the DS could handle that. Maybe some day but not right now. Maybe the WII could handle it but handheld you could play it anywhere soo..

EDIT: oh you were talking about DQMJ riiiight yeah ive got it, maybe for Pokemon yeah but still...

Ikwaylx December 14th, 2008 7:37 AM

I would like to see a fighting type based purely on special sweeping. I'm getting sick of hard hitting, physical fighters. I wanna see a fighting type that strays away from that system :p
It'd also be cool to see a pokemon that focuses on using beams.

The Confuzzler December 14th, 2008 9:39 AM

banto would be a good name.

BANTO The ROBOT POKEMON IT USES ITS SPECIAL LAZERS TO FIRE A VARIETY OF BEAM ATTACKS.

Vernikova December 14th, 2008 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ikwaylx (Post 4194226)
I would like to see a fighting type based purely on special sweeping. I'm getting sick of hard hitting, physical fighters. I wanna see a fighting type that strays away from that system :p
It'd also be cool to see a pokemon that focuses on using beams.

But how can they be a fighting-type without being overly physical?

I really want Notched Ear Pichu to be included in the game. Maybe it can be transferred to it or maybe only one in the game and you only have on chance to catch it. It would be kind of fun and you can use it for contests.

Mitchman December 14th, 2008 10:30 AM

Give me sub species. Hell thosae should be included i mean the notched ear pichu hints that.

Haza December 14th, 2008 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mitchman Is (Post 4194579)
Give me sub species. Hell thosae should be included i mean the notched ear pichu hints that.

thats a gender diff I think but remember the pink butterfree and the ones on that island that had red markings and a lot of the other pokemon had differences. I think regional differences should come.

Ikwaylx December 14th, 2008 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S. Magumarashi (Post 4194570)
But how can they be a fighting-type without being overly physical?

Well, there are a couple of special attacks which share the fighting type and they both appear to be of an 'energy wave' sort of attack.
Why not make a Pokemon based on that? It'd be a fresh and cool idea.

Vernikova December 14th, 2008 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ikwaylx (Post 4194590)
Well, there are a couple of special attacks which share the fighting type and they both appear to be of an 'energy wave' sort of attack.
Why not make a Pokemon based on that? It'd be a fresh and cool idea.

Yeah it would be but if they make one pokémon to be like that, they should make about a few more just to balance it out.

Mitchman December 14th, 2008 10:38 AM

It hasnt truly be confirmed that its due to gender. I mean each region could have a sub species. Like jhoto could have regular pichus while kanto could have long tailed or some sort of thing like that.
Get me??

citizen. December 14th, 2008 11:01 AM

I would love to see an evolution to the original three starters from Blue/Red/Green! How cool would that be to have Charizard, Blastoise, and Venasaur evolve?!


Mitchman December 14th, 2008 11:31 AM

Not as that would mean 4 levels of pokemon for each line making it too complicated. Actually pretty stupid when thought about and that would bring people to the words:
OMG pokemon is becoming digimon. The day that happens though i will laugh.

citizen. December 14th, 2008 1:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mitchman Is (Post 4194746)
Not as that would mean 4 levels of pokemon for each line making it too complicated. Actually pretty stupid when thought about and that would bring people to the words:
OMG pokemon is becoming digimon. The day that happens though i will laugh.

Just because there are four levels of evolution doesn't mean that Pokemon will turn into Digimon. Pokemon won't be talking in human voices, and they won't need like weird "Pokevices" to evolve.

Kirby Louise December 14th, 2008 2:28 PM

hmm
 
im really worried about 5th generation, because all the other pokemon games i have extremely enjoyed playing, but one thing ive really liked about the pokemon games i how each pokemon has significant cry, But i've heard rumours, that there not going to have crys anymore, and have them say there actual pokemon name like they do in the anime. tbf i think this will really spoil the whole thing...... its not the same
please tell me its just a made up rumour, or dont you know?


(:

BakingBluePotatoe December 14th, 2008 2:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirby Louise (Post 4195199)
im really worried about 5th generation, because all the other pokemon games i have extremely enjoyed playing, but one thing ive really liked about the pokemon games i how each pokemon has significant cry, But i've heard rumours, that there not going to have crys anymore, and have them say there actual pokemon name like they do in the anime. tbf i think this will really spoil the whole thing...... its not the same
please tell me its just a made up rumour, or dont you know?


(:

I had enough of that in Yellow with Pikachuu, thank you very much.


Yeah, I do think sub-species would bring a hint of realism to the table.

(Fishing in LoZ:PH different fist you caught where different sizes.... why not have every Pokemon be it's own size {have an average size, but every Pokemon can be a bit smaller or bigger}?)

Candace December 14th, 2008 2:42 PM

All this 3D talk makes me uneasy. The thing I love so much about Pokémon is that it's stayed true to its 2D design. And pixel art is ALWAYS more pleasurable and flattering to a Pokémon. It's always given the games a retro feel and sense of style. Also, it wouldn't work on the DS... but that's not the issue, the issue would be that it wouldn't work at all. I think they should stick to the 2.5D they used in DP

Quote:

But i've heard rumours, that there not going to have crys anymore, and have them say there actual pokemon name like they do in the anime. tbf i think this will really spoil the whole thing
I wouldn't be bothered by that. It'd be kinda cute (assuming they kept their original VA's). But, I think mainly it wouldn't bother me because I usually play without sound (I can get very irritated by music, so I almost never listen to anything as it is)

Ikwaylx December 14th, 2008 2:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kirby Louise (Post 4195199)
im really worried about 5th generation, because all the other pokemon games i have extremely enjoyed playing, but one thing ive really liked about the pokemon games i how each pokemon has significant cry, But i've heard rumours, that there not going to have crys anymore, and have them say there actual pokemon name like they do in the anime. tbf i think this will really spoil the whole thing...... its not the same
please tell me its just a made up rumour, or dont you know?


(:

There's no proof and the anime is totally different to the game. I doubt they'd do that.

Haza December 14th, 2008 5:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by citizen. (Post 4194654)
I would love to see an evolution to the original three starters from Blue/Red/Green! How cool would that be to have Charizard, Blastoise, and Venasaur evolve?!


actually there was art "leaked" that was said to be from sugimori for the 5th gen. They looked old but it was starter split evolutions.

Ezzo! December 14th, 2008 5:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by - H A Z A - D I V O - (Post 4195539)
actually there was art "leaked" that was said to be from sugimori for the 5th gen. They looked old but it was starter split evolutions.

Where would the leaked info be? :cer_disbelief:
I wanna see. :D

Haza December 14th, 2008 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sky Forme (Post 4195542)
Where would the leaked info be? :cer_disbelief:
I wanna see. :D

Serebii suspected(but not confirmed) them to be fake but I posted them in the 5th Gen Confirmed thread. Dont think much of them though. They are great but people never said much of them.

Also in this future generation I want an only male evolution of Roselia that is more masculine.

Xebelleon December 14th, 2008 10:38 PM

Wonder if we will ever see "Number Pokemon"...

Like Alphabet Unown, only number shaped.

I want more Braille puzzles or Braille puzzles in general to return in the next Generation. Those things were awesome. Great slow change of pace.

HeidiMoose December 15th, 2008 1:40 AM

Hmmm.. I guess I'll put a "little" wishlist.. or somesuch like that.
Actually.. it's quite long..
-----
I'd stated in another thread on the forum that the remaining untouched Kanto Pokemon should be left alone, but I might break my own opinion here, as I'm trying to keep an open mind.
-----
Pre-Evolutions for -

Kangaskhan: I merely say this, only because it makes sense. It carries that little guy in it's pouch.. but when does that little guy grow to become an actual Kangaskhan, that's what I'd like to know? I wish they'd just make it an actual pre-evolution and we could actually use it in battle and whatnot. I mean, it looks like Kangaskhan, but the coloring and even it's eyes seem to be completely different.

Scyther: Scyther is a strong Pokemon as it is, and I'm a firm believer in starting off a little less strong than that.. O.o

Pinser: Same argument as Scyther.

Tauros/Miltank: I think creating a pre-evo that evolves into current counterpart Pokemon (such as Tauros and Miltank) makes enough sense to actually create one. Varying on it's gender it evolves into the appropriate Pokemon, and as a pre-evo has characteristics of both.

Aerodactyle: I italicize this because it wouldn't make sense as far as the game's storyline goes, as we've already known it to be revived from Old Amber. Therefore, it couldn't possibly have one. But.. imagine seeing an Aerodactyle hatch from an egg.. yeah.. O.o

Skarmory: Same argument as Scyther & Pinsir.

Mawile: It just seems like it would evovle from something. Having no pre-evo just seems unfinished to me..

Plusle/Minun: Whoever mention 'Neutrus'.. I completely agree. It would be very interesting. You can only obtain it through breeding, though it's not a pre-evo.. and it's just slightly stronger than Plusle/Minun because their power in combined. I'm completely all for this, I think it's a very cool idea. :D

Volbeat/Illumise: Same argument as Tauros/Miltank.

Torkoal: This also feels like it should evovle from something.

Zangoose: Feels like it should evolve from something.

Seviper: Feels like it should evolve from something. (And no, NOT ARBOK!)

Carnivine: Again, feels like it should evolve from something.

I'm going to state an argument in pre-evolution's defense. I'm not a fan of baby Pokemon.. but there's some base Pokemon that just seem too strong to be base Pokemon. I don't like baby Pokemon because usually you have to breed in order to obtain them, and then it's just completely pointless to have them. They just add to the Pokedex. They're like.. filler Pokemon. Now.. if you had to catch those Pokemon in the wild, and THEN evolve them.. then I'm all for it. Because that's the point. You catch a "weak" Pokemon, and you train it and help it grow so it can evolve and become a strong Pokemon. That's part of the whole fun in the game.
-----
Evolutions for -

Eevee: Yes.. I'm an Eevee fan. I can only think of two more types that would really suit the Eeveelution line.. so here goes: a Poison-Type, and a Steel-Type. Otherwise.. it would be cool to do combined types. A few years ago I played around with Eevee evolving due to weather or random events. One example I made up would be an electric/flying type when Eevee evolved during a thunderstorm. There were a couple others, none that I can think of from the top of my head, though.)

Dunsparce: It's simple really. Dunsparce isn't anything super special, and it seems like an unfinished Pokemon.. it should evolve and become more "finished."

Quilfish: Another seemingly useless Pokemon.. give it an evolution and it will be more useful. :P

Shuckle: Feels like it should evolve into something. (If it weren't for the type difference, wouldn't it seem like Shuckle and Torkoal were related??)

Sableye: Feels like it should evolve..

Spinda: Same argument as above..

Combee: Definetely much agreed there should be a male counterpart to Vespiqueen.
-----

Gameplay wishlist:

-Keep Day/Night system.
-Day-of-the-week System. It seems to exist in Diamond/Pearl.. but the only event I can think of which relates to this is Drifbloom being available on Fridays or whatever.. : /
-Upgraded Poketch-like thing. With Phone capabilites that performed similar to the Pokegear in G/S/C.. (random calls from registered numbers, for example.. those always made me smile, even though they were repetitive).
-Random Weather/Seasons of the year capabilities. Since you can put the date in the DS, it would be cool to apply that towards the game, and have the seasons of the year. And along with those seasons would be random weather, like rain, snow, fog, etc.. Also, it'd be cool to incorporate what happens to plants during the certain seasons. Seeing the trees change to orange/brown/red colors in the fall, be completely leafless in the winter, different colors and young leafs in the Spring, and what we're normally used to seeing during the summer time. Also, maybe something like certain Pokemon only come out during certain weather. And as stated above when I spoke of more Eeveelutions, maybe certain weather could effect certain Pokemon evolutions, just as day/night affects certain Pokemon. I think it would add an interesting twist. Might take the game a little longer than you'd want, but I think it'd be a good way to keep a person involved in the game..
-Cutscenes. Whoever mentioned this earlier, I think it's a brilliant idea, and would add more to character developement.
-Character Customization. I'm looking at this more-as you pick boy or girl, and it's all the same design, but you can pick the hair-color, clothing patterns and colors, and accessory colors and stuff.. nothing too complicated, but enough to make it feel like it's your character instead of.. "Hey look, I'm May." or "Lookit Me! I'm Dawn!" (I'm personally not a fan of Dawn, and it's irksome to have to see her everytime I play Diamond.)
-----

Gym Leader Types:
Assuming it will continue with the Grass/Fire/Water type starter Pokemon combination, I think starting with something they're all neutral against is an excellent idea. I'M TIRED OF THE FIRST GYM ALMOST ALWAYS BEING ROCK-TYPE! >.<
Anyway, I'd like this particular order:

1. Normal (Yes, normal. It's as neutral as a type is going to get).
2. Poison (Still pretty neutral, assuming the team hasn't improved vastly on type variety)
3. Ground (Now we can add a gym with a weakness to two of the starter pokemon types (Water and Grass).
4. Ice (Since a number of Ice-Types are combined with the Water-Type element or vice versa, it's safe to say that fire and grass could be strong in said gym, but with the twist that fire is weak against water, and grass is weak against ice. I'd say at this point it was time for a challenge.)
5. Steel (Depending on the type, Steel would be a good gym for a challenge. Pokemon such as Steelix are weak against both fire and water types, wheras Pokemon such as Magneton are weak against fire, strong against water, and is resisted by grass. Of course, there would be the given new Pokemon.. but still.)
6. Fire (Just for something generic.. a strength against the previous gym type).
7. Dark (It's time for a gym that specializes in the Dark type. I think at this point in the game it'd be cool to go against some strong dark-types, assuming you'd hae psychics that are weak to them, and fighting-types that are strong against them.)
8. Dragon (Just for some G/S/C Nostalgia XD)

Might seem like an odd type line up for gym leaders, but I'm getting tired of them overusing types like electric, psychic, fighting, ROCK, etc...

And as for the Elite Four (Seperate from my feelings towards the gym leaders, I'm just trying for types that I haven't mentioned, and haven't already been used in the elite four line up):
1. Flying
2. Electric
3. Ground Water
4. Grass

Though these may be somewhat generic types, I think that the line-up would make it more difficult to pick a single team that would get through that without some difficulty. For example: Electric is good against flying, but basically useless to the remaining three types, you could use rock, which is good against the first two types, but weak against the second two. Water is good against ground, and if taught an ice move, will work against grass. Flying is good against Grass and immune to Ground, neutral to Flying, but weak to electric, and so on..

And of course, the Champion would have mixed types.
-----
Type Combination wishlist:
Dragon/Fire (I'm surprised they haven't come up with this, since mythologically, dragons are usually seen as fire-breathing creatures.. )
Dragon/Ice (just because it would be pwnage XD)
Bug/Dark (just sounds interesting enough.. )
Psychic/Poison (Again sounds interesting.. I can't recall any Pokemon being of this type.. correct me if I'm wrong. X_x)
Ghost/Steel (Intersting.. )
Steel/Dark (Correct me if there's a Pokemon like this too, but I can't recall, and seeing as these are the two youngest types, it'd be cool to see them combined, just for nostalgia or something. XD)

And just for fun, but definetely not serious.

PSYCHIC/DARK - THE NEW UBER! XD
-----
Legendaries:

Just.. 7-8 Pokemon limit. We don't need.. 15 more! Just a good few with whatever background and story, and whatever ability.
-----
And just to finish the list. Obviously new moves, and hopefully new abilities. Maybe some new natures if they can think of any, or if there's any other plus this minus that combinations left. (I don't have all the natures down by heart, so I'm just throwing this out there).



Anywho.. I think that's enough.. Probably a little more detailed than desired.. I have more ideas I could throw out there and I could aknowledge ideas made in previous posts that I agree with.. but I think what I've typed is quite enough..O.o *shot*

Zelda December 15th, 2008 5:24 AM

Well making the Advance Generation Games to the Ds will be awesome...I would get rid of the GBA ones and stick to the Ds ones...lol they can also remake it to where u can trade sinnoh pokemon to it...quite a challenge to the pokedex I believe. What do u guys think?

UberChomp December 15th, 2008 1:39 PM

As with every generation of pokemon, new typing combonations are debuted. Some of them I'd like to see in the 5th gen are:

Dark/Electric
Dark/Bug
Fire/Bug
Ghost/Steel
Ghost/Rock


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 4:03 AM.


Like our Facebook Page Follow us on Twitter © 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.

Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.