![]() |
What do you think of: torchic
okay i got a whole crap load of replies on the treeko one so i thought id ask about torchic. what do you think of it?
|
Torchic is weak and so are it's evolutions.
My Sceptile can probably killed off a Blaziken with one little Aerial Ace. |
I like all the starters, because I can have all of them when walking through the game :P
They've got their strengths and weaknesses. |
Torchic is cute, and personally, I chose it to be my starter particularly because of that. I find its evolutions average compared to others. Though, through my experiences in the game, Blaziken is one of my powerhouses, so its hard to say something bad about it.
|
Before I had any knowledge whatsoever of 3rd gen pokés, I chose Torchic hands down as my starter on my ruby version and grew to like it so much, I simply wouldn't allow it to evolve! (especially after dicovering what it evolves into! (I'm sorry, but Combusken and Blaziken look like a chicken and an overly-humanoid digimon, to be honest, and I'm not a fan of the fighting type either)) It is now an irreversible decision; as I recently finished raising my Torchic to level 100!
I love Torchic... Or at least really, really like it... as a Pokémon. |
Fire-types, in general, are very over-rated, and Torchic is no exception. Being weak to FOUR of the most common moves in the game (Surf, Earthquake, Aerial Ace, and Psychic) doesn't help either. It's real only saving grace that makes it barely better than Charizard, is that it can be a decent mixed sweeper.
Still, easily the weakest Advanced Gen starter and plagued by a very weak typing. |
Torchics are cute =P.
I would give it an everstone to prevent it from evolving coz I reckon fighting and fire types don't mix. I also tested this and a lvl 50 Torchics Sp Atk is higher than a lvl 50 Blazikens Atk, however I do believe that it could be EVs and nature influencing this so don't judge me too harshly... @Shanecdavis: Water Types are also overrated just to let you know, the only type that ISN'T overrated is the grass types (which I enjoy using ^^) |
Exactly how are Water-types overrated????
|
Quote:
Fire is likewise except all of them are overrated. |
Overrated means people thinking they are good when they really aren't. That describes Fire-types perfectly, but definitely not Water-types. Blastoise, Feraligatr, and Swampert are all vastly different, with Swampert easily not only the best of the three, but the best starter of all the games. Water/Ground is an amazing type as it gives Swampert one single weakness, and it can learn Ice Beam to cover that weakness. A Sceptile takes serious damage when it switches in to a Swampert that uses Ice Beam. Swampert also has solid base Def, allowing it to take physical hits rather well. It also has the most diverse movepool. Lastly, it can learn its best moveset halfway through the game (if you use the Earthquake TM on it instead of waiting it to level up to get it). Both Sceptile and Blaziken cannot learn their best moveset until way after the "elite" 4 and only in Emerald with the MT moves at Battle Frontier.
If you ever battle competitively, you will almost always see a Water-type on a good team (Suicune, Swampert, Vaporeon, Milotic, etc., etc.) while you will rarely see a Fire or Grass type. Water-types even have their own classification - Bulky Water. That is far from overrated, that is one of the best types in the game. |
i always choose torchic as my starter, fire types pokemons are few in games... water and grass pokemon are common.
I think torchic is very cute btw :P |
First off, Blaziken is a powerhouse in RSE. Not overrated.
Second, it learns a good variety of moves to cover weaknesses (well, at least in D/P/Pt) ie Shadow claw, Grass know etc. Thirdly, not evolving a Torchic is a stupid idea. Enjoy your base 60/70 atk sp.atk. Fourthly, Water types are not overrated, SWAMPERT FTW LAWL and Finally,never, I say NEVER say anything without backing it up. |
@ Shanecdavis:
Exactly, I've been hearing pokemon like Charizard, Blastoise, Typhlosion, Blaziken, Swampert, Torterra and Empoleon like being the best. I mean Venusaur, Meganium, Feraligatr and Sceptile are also good too (never used the 4th generation starters before), I don't get why some people say something like "OMG! Charizard OWNS" or "Swampert PWNS!" when the others are pretty much equally as good. I've used all the starters (except for the 4th gen starters) and I found they're all good depending on how you use it. Indeed Swampert is a effective pokemon to have but so is Blaziken and Sceptile, most people tend to overrate other pokemon leading others to believe in their words. Personally I believe Swampert is one of the easiest starters to use hence people overrate it. @ SkyPioneer: The majority of the starters are pretty much overrated, Blaziken is not what I call a powerhouse, it's pretty much the same as others depending on how you use it. And I wholeheartly agree with you on Blaziken learning other type moves to cover its weakness, don't forget that Swampert and Sceptile too can also do that. Not evolving Torchic has it's advantages and disadvantages, I'm not 100% sure about this but Torchics SP atk is higher than Blazikens Atk although it could be under the influence of the nature and EVs. The main disadvantage with this is that Torchics HP and defensewise is weak. And lastly, all the fire and water types are pretty much overrated in many ways with the exception of Totodile. I still find it odd how when pokemon first came out, all my friends were like "OMG! CHARMANDER AND SQUIRTLES ARE THE BEST, THEY OWN!" And when I owned my game, I started with bulbusaur and they bagged the hell out of me. But in the end, I proved to them that Venusaur was equally as good as Charizard and Blastoise by fighting them via link cable. I don't overrate Charmanders nor do I think they're horrible starters to use. The only reason I like them is coz they're so cute and spunky =P. |
Heh. I LOVE discussions about Fire-types.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
HP: 294 Atk: 240 Def: 196 SAtk: 262 SDef: 218 Spd: 207 TOTAL: 1417 Now here are Blaziken's: HP: 364 Atk: 372 Def: 262 SAtk: 350 SDef: 262 Spd: 284 TOTAL: 1894 There is not a single thing that Torchic can do, that Blaziken cannot do better. Not to mention the fact that Blaziken has STAB Fighting attacks and can learn both Ice Beam and Thunderpunch. Torchic cannot. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
With those stats above, are those from your pokemon? If so, tell me their nature (Brave, Docile, Adamant etc.)... |
Those stats are Lv100, max IV/EVs, and positive nature. I am not sure what the relevance of comparing a Torchic SAtk with a Blaziken Atk is. That only tells me (1) your Torchic is a higher level, or (2) that is one crappy Blaziken with a negative nature, and horrible IVs. I would definitely breed for a better one.
|
Quote:
BLaziken ain't that good a sweeper but I'm confident it can beat Infernape. endure/salac/reversal>Infernape All I wanted to imply is that the Torchic line is a decent and awesome starter-line. Um... shanecdavis... Blastoise and Feraligatr are BL... One more thing... Blaziken with an Ice beam??? http://archives.bulbagarden.net/w/upload/b/b9/Spr_3e_257.gif"Z0MG! BlAZ1K3N PAWN5 A11!" lol. |
Quote:
After checking bulbapedia, it says that: Mild = +Sp Atk, - Def Calm = +Sp Def, -Atk well that explains it, nature screwed up the Blazikens stats bigtime =_=. |
Quote:
Yeah, Ice Beam on Blaziken is silly. I blame lack of sleep. Yeah, that will work. Quote:
|
Yeah... I agree I am confusing myself with DPP. I play too much 4th gen, I forget about the AGG.
|
As I said before, that is why I don't bother with DPP. Waste of a game. All it did is water down the metagame and cause confusion in Adv Gen. I admit I miss the WiFi feature, but that is all. I will also admit I like battling against someone who plays DDP a lot and thinks a move is physical when it is really special, or vice versa.
|
Torchic and it's evolutions are a real STABber in the game, great Attack and Special Attack. They are the real assault-battle type pokemon I've ever used. The main problem is Speed and Defense, It can be easily wiped out with one powerful super-effective move. I also liked it's fluffyness and cuteness, and it's evolutions are way awesome.
|
I love Torchic because Blaziken is my attack beast (I love its EV).
|
Torchic, or should I say Blaziken, doesn't bennifit at all from it's typing. Fire is not a good type, weakness to water and ground = epic failure in metagame. Fighting gives it more weaknesses, with really giving it any descent resistances. It's defenses aren't good enough to allow to last more than a turn or two in a metabattle, and it's not fast enough to get the first attack often enough to use it's mixed attacker abilities. Types it gets STAB attacks against aren't very common anyway. Grass, Bug, Rock are all fairly uncommon, Dark, Steel and, ummmm... Ice, I guess are useful. Blaziken is not better than charizard. Flying is way better than fighting, mainly because Charizard gets immunity to ground, one of fire's biggest Achilles heels.
Whoever said Swampert is overrated is a complete fool for reasons already stated. oh, and it is cakewalk |
I LOOOOOOOOOOOVE TORCHIC COMBUSKEN AND BLAZIKEN....and for those people who hate em all...then I say watch out when MY blaziken beats you!!!!!!!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:49 AM. |
![]()
© 2002 - 2018 The PokéCommunity™, pokecommunity.com.
Pokémon characters and images belong to The Pokémon Company International and Nintendo. This website is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, The Pokémon Company or The Pokémon Company International. We just love Pokémon.
All forum styles, their images (unless noted otherwise) and site designs are © 2002 - 2016 The PokéCommunity / PokéCommunity.com.
PokéCommunity™ is a trademark of The PokéCommunity. All rights reserved. Sponsor advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service. User generated content remains the property of its creator.
Acknowledgements
Use of PokéCommunity Assets
vB Optimise by DragonByte Technologies Ltd © 2023.